• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Did Jesus commit suicide?

iam1me

Active Member
1 Death of Jesus Christ was not a suicide, because it has a Purpose and that was the Will of God.

There's nothing in the definition of suicide that would exclude it from applying to Jesus' intentional self-sacrifice just because it was the Will of God.


2 He did not take His Own Life ... Some one Killed Him

See the scripture supplied in the OP. Jesus says that no one takes his life, but he lays it down of his own accord.
 

sparcz1978

Member
His Death already known to Prophet Isaiah


Isaiah 53:5
But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.



Jesus Christ Knows the Way and Time of His Death


John 2:4

And Jesus *said to her, “Woman, what does that have to do with us? My hour has not yet come.”


Matthew 26:18

And He said, “Go into the city to a certain man, and say to him, ‘The Teacher says, “My time is near; I am to keep the Passover at your house with My disciples.”’”


John 7:8

Go up to the feast yourselves; I do not go up to this feast because My time has not yet fully come.”


Jesus Christ Mentioned His Death to the Apostles


Matthew 20:18
“Behold, we are going up to Jerusalem; and the Son of Man will be delivered to the chief priests and scribes, and they will condemn Him to death,



Matthew 17:22
And while they were gathering together in Galilee, Jesus said to them, “The Son of Man is going to be delivered into the hands of men;


Mark 9:31
For He was teaching His disciples and telling them, “The Son of Man is to be delivered into the hands of men, and they will kill Him; and when He has been killed, He will rise three days later.”


Luke 9:22
saying, “The Son of Man must suffer many things and be rejected by the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed and be raised up on the third day.”



Jesus Christ Pray about His own Death


Matthew 26:39

And He went a little beyond them, and fell on His face and prayed, saying, “My Father, if it is possible, let this cup pass from Me; yet not as I will, but as You will.”


The Way Jesus Christ was arrested until he was Killed was already known to him


John 18:25-35 New American Standard Bible (NASB)

Now Simon Peter was standing and warming himself. So they said to him, “You are not also one of His disciples, are you?” He denied it, and said, “I am not.” One of the slaves of the high priest, being a relative of the one whose ear Peter cut off, *said, “Did I not see you in the garden with Him?” Peter then denied it again, and immediately a rooster crowed.

Then they *led Jesus from Caiaphas into the Praetorium, and it was early; and they themselves did not enter into the Praetorium so that they would not be defiled, but might eat the Passover. Therefore Pilate went out to them and *said, “What accusation do you bring against this Man?” They answered and said to him, “If this Man were not an evildoer, we would not have delivered Him to you.” So Pilate said to them, “Take Him yourselves, and judge Him according to your law.” The Jews said to him, “We are not permitted to put anyone to death, ”to fulfill the word of Jesus which He spoke, signifying by what kind of death He was about to die.

Therefore Pilate entered again into the Praetorium, and summoned Jesus and said to Him, “Are You the King of the Jews?” Jesus answered, “Are you saying this on your own initiative, or did others tell you about Me?” Pilate answered, “I am not a Jew, am I? Your own nation and the chief priests delivered You to me; what have You done?”






Even the TIME AND WAY how Jesus Christ was arrested and Killed was in favor of God


John 7:30 New American Standard Bible (NASB)

So they were seeking to seize Him; and no man laid his hand on Him, because His hour had not yet come.


John 10:16-18

I have other sheep, which are not of this fold; I must bring them also, and they will hear My voice; and they will become one flock with one shepherd. For this reason the Father loves Me, because I lay down My life so that I may take it again. No one has taken it away from Me, but I lay it down on My own initiative. I have authority to lay it down, and I have authority to take it up again. This commandment I received from My Father.”




Reasons



John 10:15
even as the Father knows Me and I know the Father; and I lay down My life for the sheep.



Matthew 20:28
just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life a ransom for many.”


Mark 10:45
For even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life a ransom for many.”



Hebrews 2:17

Therefore, He had to be made like His brethren in all things, so that He might become a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make propitiation for the sins of the people.




Romans 8:3

For what the Law could not do, weak as it was through the flesh, God did: sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and as an offering for sin, He condemned sin in the flesh,



He did not commit suicide:

1 He Just Follow God’s Command about His Death…

2 He Died in the Will of God for our Sake
 

sparcz1978

Member
There's nothing in the definition of suicide that would exclude it from applying to Jesus' intentional self-sacrifice just because it was the Will of God.



See the scripture supplied in the OP. Jesus says that no one takes his life, but he lays it down of his own accord.


and that Command was from God ... not from his own ...


John 10:17-18 The reason my Father loves me is that I lay down my life—only to take it up again. 18 No one takes it from me, but I lay it down of my own accord. I have authority to lay it down and authority to take it up again.
This command I received from my Father.”


Don't disregard that God has the Will and Command it to Jesus Christ...

If you disregard, His Death will make nonsense and you just want to say he is a Sinner..that commit Suicide

Luke 22:42
“Father, if you are willing, take this cup from me; yet not my will, but yours be done.”
 
Last edited:

sparcz1978

Member
Every Action and Words From Jesus Christ was not from His Own...

Jesus Christ Just do what God Has Commanded to Do and Say...

John 8:28
So Jesus said, “When you have lifted up the Son of Man, then you will know that I am he and that I do nothing on my own but speak just what the Father has taught me.

John 9:33
If this man were not from God, he could do nothing.”


the Defenition of Suicide is not applicable to Jesus Christ Life and Death



John 14:24
Anyone who does not love me will not obey my teaching. These words you hear are not my own; they belong to the Father who sent me.


John 17:4
I have glorified thee on the earth: I have finished the work which thou gavest me to do.



John 19:30
When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished: and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost.
 

Cooky

Veteran Member
Legitimate question here, and an interesting one for Catholics in particular to address (since they deem it an unforgivable sin).

First I'll post a common definition of suicide for arguments sake:

noun
1 the intentional taking of one's own life.
2 destruction of one's own interests or prospects: Buying that house was financial suicide.
3 a person who intentionally takes his or her own life.
verb (used without object), su·i·cid·ed, su·i·cid·ing.
1 to commit suicide.
verb (used with object), su·i·cid·ed, su·i·cid·ing.
1 to kill (oneself).
Definition of suicide | Dictionary.com

Next I'll cite some scripture where Jesus claims that no one is taking his life from him - he lays it down himself.

John 10:17-18 The reason my Father loves me is that I lay down my life—only to take it up again. 18 No one takes it from me, but I lay it down of my own accord. I have authority to lay it down and authority to take it up again. This command I received from my Father.”

So then, Jesus intentionally ended his own life - laying it down of his own accord. This would seem to fit the standard definition of suicide to me, but perhaps I am missing something.

Thoughts? I'd especially love to hear the Catholic opinion on this.

No, Jesus was able to perform miracles and *also* was a prophet. He knew they were going to kill him.

...But Jesus is not guilty of suicide since he didn't take his own life. Similarly, I will not be guilty of suicide from smoking even though I know it causes cancer.

Suicide is.a very specific thing.
 

sparcz1978

Member
I remember that Topic

From BBC Bible Mysteries...

The Topic was WHO KILLED JESUS? but the whole Video ended to Suicide... why?
because they cut all of the Testimonies of Jesus Christ ...they also don't consider the Will of God...
89069124_1307005662820537_3376370840466620416_n.jpg
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
You are throwing out the definition when you decide to make up your own private qualifiers and definitions for terms
No, I’m building upon the definition. Does one throw out the foundation when one adds a roof?

Yes I am looking at the Spirit of the matter, thanks
Nope. See below: you say “you simply need to know the definition.” That’s the letter, not the spirit.

Church authorities" are irrelevant. What matters is the truth.
Church authorities are relevant because it is we who provide authoritative judgments with regard to interpretation.
Not at all - no. You simply need to know the definition of suicide and the relevant details of a death to determine if it was a suicide
Not according to the CDC.

You simply need to know the definition of suicide
See above. And below. You’re talking out both sides of your mouth. You can’t address the spirit of the definition if you’re only considering the letter of the definition.

You said: "not included in the definition, because definitions generally don’t deal in emotional judgments, as religious implications must do." If it's not part of the definition,as you admit, then this emotional judgement is coming from you
In the first place, you’re misapprehending what I meant by “emotional judgment.”
Second, going beyond just the definition necessarily includes the definition.

Only contextual information can objectively lead us to a conclusion
See what I said above. We have to contextualize the definition. But again, you’re talking out both sides of your mouth. See below.

Also, it's fine to research the issue - but the only relevant evidence for this discussion is scripture and the dictionary
Really? I could’ve sworn you just said above that you need context...
You don't have to explicitly something to communicate it.
But one needs proper interpretation. That’s where you fall down.
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
He was sent to die according to all of the Gospels and epistles.
This is exactly what makes all the usual meanings for words like suicide and sacrifice irrelevant in the context of The Legend of Christ.

If the Christian boilerplate is true, Jesus chose an ugly execution. But not death, because Resurrection and all. Judas, the High Priests, Pilate, and all were tools being used. God the Father wanted a deicidal Sacrifice, and got it from Jesus. Jesus had a very bad weekend, but didn't really die.

And He picked Judas for a task, which Judas accomplished. He's the only suicide in the story.

Seems a bit shallow of the other Apostles to treat him so badly afterwards. And it isn't like they didn't know, Jesus preached for 40 days afterwards. The utter lack of logic to that is part of the reasons I think the Legend of Christ was invented years after the fact.
Tom
 

Muffled

Jesus in me
I believe as not a Catholic that it is not an unpardonable sin and that it wasn't suicide. It was a sacrifice like a person trying to save someone drowning but drowning himself.
 
If you can show from the definition that it only counts as suicide if the desired end result is death then you'd have a case. However, there's no such qualification in the definition.
Suicide, by definition, is the intended and purposeful act of killing oneself. The desired end result is death as one is intending and purposefully ending one's life.
John's was a distinct testimony from the Synoptic Gospels. That doesn't mean he was making things up. You are jumping to unjustified conclusions.
So that doesn't address what I said. I'm not jumping to an unjustified conclusion just because you can't form a rebuttal. John never wrote the Gospel. The title, the Gospel according to John is a later addition. Second, we know it isn't a distinct testimony as it seemingly, and really logically, is using older sources in order to create a new story. We can be certain it's using older sources because of the composition of it, which makes this clear, but also because of the date in which it was written. It is too late to be first hand, so thus it logically has to be at least a second hand story.

John also contradicts the Synoptic Gospels at times, so we can logically assume that one or the other is wrong. They also hold differing theological views which are opposed. We have everything pointing to the fact that some of this stuff is made up. More so, from a historical perspective, and this is what the Jesus Seminar did, as have many others have done, since the quote is singly attested to, the likely hood it is authentic, simply based on how history is done, is rather low. It also contains high Christology, which we see developing later on, and is distinctly different from our earlier sources. Studying the development of theology, we know that something like this develops from a simplified version to more complex. So again, we can say that it most likely isn't from Jesus.

Finally, no one was writing down direct quotes from Jesus. That wasn't how historians did it at that time. They created the speeches later on, and that leads to some mighty problems. Since all writers are biased, that is going to show up in those speeches. But more so, the Gospels weren't written as history today. They were written as largely theology, they were written as literally, the Good News. So the purpose of what the author is doing from the beginning is to spread theology, which we see in the verses you took out of context.
You are appealing to a wider context but then fail to follow through and show how this wider context should lead us to a different interpretation. So you've said a lot of nothing.
One, you have to appeal to the wider context, as the entire passage matters here. It's written as one entire passage. Second, I address the interpretation, which has to reflect the Hebrew Scriptures which are being built on. The whole thing is talking about how Jesus is the ideal leader, the good shepherd. That a good shepherd will lay down their lives for their flocks, which is what Jesus says in the preceding verse.
The end goal wasn't death, but the death was very much intentional as a means to an end. You have failed to meaningfully address this and instead are trying to dance around this obvious truth.
If the end goal wasn't death, then it can't be suicide. You are trying to make up a new definition for suicide. I'm not dancing around anything. You're literally redefining what suicide means in almost every post.
I explained why you were wrong, but here let me repeat it for you: "Nothing in the context of that passage leads us to think that he was merely speaking of being in a risky position. He was adamant that no one takes his life, but that he lays his life down."
Have you read the full passage? Just read the verses preceding it. He specifically likens himself to a shepherd of a flock (such as a flock of sheep). If you know anything about a shepherd, that is a very risky position. We see that continually throughout the Bible. As a shepherd, you would be armed in order to protect your flock from many dangers. It is a very risky position. And Jesus is placing himself there. He is literally saying, I'm the shepherd, the ideal leader. And he's saying, I will lay down my life to save my flock. He's not saying he will kill himself, but he will allow himself to be killed if that means saving his flock. That isn't suicide as it is not an intentional and purposeful taking of one's life. The desire, as we both agree, isn't death.

Trying to make everything about you? lolz. It's a statistical argument - most Christians are Trinitarians.
How did I try to make this about me? I'm a Trinitarian. You don't need John to show argue for the Trinity. A better argument would be to look at Paul's framework that is then built off of until we get the polished Trinitarian view later on. And Paul was just borrowing from a binitarian view that was present within Judaism.
Knowing people are going to kill you and intentionally taking actions to allow that to happen so that you can die is suicide, by definition. He could have ran away. He could have fought. Peter even tried to dissuade him from it - and he rebuked him for attempting to tempt him away from fulfilling God's will for him: to die on the cross.
So Martin Luther King Jr. committed suicide? So did Malcolm X? Both of them knew there was a threat on their lives. Malcolm X talked of this a number of times, and even narrowly escaped a few attempts. He could have ran away. He had people who tried to dissuade him. But he continued on, knowing full well what was going to happen.

Jesus didn't take any additional actions to lead to his death. He simply didn't run away or shrink away in fear. If we look at people who have sacrificed them, they generally have a way out. They could run away and hide. But to do such destroys the mission they are on.
You are welcome to provide your own interpretation of the passage and show why I'm wrong. Why did he rebuke Peter for only looking at human concerns vs God's?
That's not really how a debate works. You presented an idea, one that is against the consensus among experts. You have the burden of proof then to show why your interpretation is right. Not the other way around. You whole argument rests on a fuzzy idea of suicide, and the one line that Jesus says he has the power to lay down his life, that no one can take it. He never says, I'm the only one who can kill me. He doesn't say he is looking to die, or he is intentionally and purposefully looking for a way to take his own life. He never says his desire is to die. He says that he has the power to lay down his life.

If we look up what laying down one's life means, according to the dictionary, it mean's to die for a good cause. An example given of this idiom is: "heroes who laid down their lives to preserve our nation" (coming from the Merriam-Webster Dictionary. When a soldier goes out to fight for my country, and they lay down their lives to protect our freedom, I don't say they committed suicide. They also could have ran away. But they made the choice to take their lives in their own hands, and lay it down for what they believe is a good cause. That's a sacrifice, not a suicide.
Indeed, but they aren't mutually exclusive. Both apply here.
Except they don't, as has been explained quite a bit.
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
I believe God can do whatever He wants and He is the one who decides when a person dies unless a person commits suicide or murder.
But, according to Christianity, nobody ever dies.
Their body does, but they continue forever.
Tom
 

Muffled

Jesus in me
Jesus allowed himself to be killed.
He did nothing to stop it.
That is passive suicide.

I believe suicide has to be voluntary. In the prayer made in the garden the body did not wish to die but I figure God has his own agenda and doesn't worry about death.
 

Muffled

Jesus in me
But, according to Christianity, nobody ever dies.
Their body does, but they continue forever.
Tom

i believe the body makes us somebody and that dies. Yes, the spirit lives on and can go on to another life but it won't be the same life.
 

Muffled

Jesus in me
Jesus said that it was commanded of him by his Father to lay down his life and to take it up again..John 10:17-18

Even though he died, he yet lives, because he died.

If he had not laid down his life he would have been in disobedience to God's command to do so.

I believe that is a false interpretation. Jesus does not say He was commanded in those verses.
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
i believe the body makes us somebody and that dies. Yes, the spirit lives on and can go on to another life but it won't be the same life.
So, you're redefining death to suit your religious beliefs.

Why would the Bible refer to Jesus's Death, if He went on to Divine Personhood? And as a Person of God(one of only three), He knew that He was in for a bad weekend followed by (another) Eternity of Glory.

The Christian story doesn't make any sense to me, except as a bizarre fiction invented by primitive folks around 2000 years ago for human purposes.
That makes complete sense.
Tom
 

iam1me

Active Member
No, Jesus was able to perform miracles and *also* was a prophet. He knew they were going to kill him.

...But Jesus is not guilty of suicide since he didn't take his own life. Similarly, I will not be guilty of suicide from smoking even though I know it causes cancer.

Suicide is.a very specific thing.

What about Jesus' own words on the subject? That no one takes his life, but that he lays it down of his own accord?

Jesus could have defended himself if he so chose. Note what he says to his disciples who raised swords to defend him:


Matthew 26:52-54 “Put your sword back in its place,” Jesus said to him, “for all who draw the sword will die by the sword. 53 Do you think I cannot call on my Father, and he will at once put at my disposal more than twelve legions of angels? 54 But how then would the Scriptures be fulfilled that say it must happen in this way?”

It is not that Jesus foresaw an inescapable future, but that he actively chose that path to fulfill the prophecies.
 

iam1me

Active Member
Not according to the CDC. End of story.

The CDC doesn't define suicide, nor are you in a position to arbitrarily extend it with your emotional judgements. We have reached an impasse I'm afraid; you can't discuss the matter objectively.
 

iam1me

Active Member
This is exactly what makes all the usual meanings for words like suicide and sacrifice irrelevant in the context of The Legend of Christ.

If the Christian boilerplate is true, Jesus chose an ugly execution. But not death, because Resurrection and all. Judas, the High Priests, Pilate, and all were tools being used. God the Father wanted a deicidal Sacrifice, and got it from Jesus. Jesus had a very bad weekend, but didn't really die.

And He picked Judas for a task, which Judas accomplished. He's the only suicide in the story.

Seems a bit shallow of the other Apostles to treat him so badly afterwards. And it isn't like they didn't know, Jesus preached for 40 days afterwards. The utter lack of logic to that is part of the reasons I think the Legend of Christ was invented years after the fact.
Tom

You can't resurrect someone who is alive. He had to really suffer and die first. You don't get to brush over that part.
 
Top