I hate to break it to you kiddo but you’re not the one.
Since you've got no proof for that, and we've got overwhelming evidence, that is an illogical statement; which we could
diagnose as mental illness, to assume something doesn't exist, that we can show.
The problem with Islam is Ali should have been the successor after Muhammad.
We see hereditary succession in the Bible, and apostolic succession going wrong, as neither is Kosher; Saul was removed as king, God appoints David by soul record, not by his family line.
To call them unbelievers is too strong.
Calling them unbelievers as the text states, is slight in comparison; the Bible, Zoroastrian, Quran & Hindu texts all say the Source of reality is going to remove them from reality by Holy Fire in a Day, as they are all Adharmic - there is only one religion according to the texts.
Quran 4:150-151 Indeed, those who disbelieve in Allah and His messengers and wish to discriminate between Allah and His messengers and say, "We believe in some and disbelieve in others," and wish to adopt a way in between - Those are the disbelievers, truly. And We have prepared for the disbelievers a humiliating punishment.
Revelation 10:11 They told me, “You must prophesy again over many peoples, nations, languages, and kings.”
Yasna 16:3. And we worship the former religions of the world devoted to Righteousness which were instituted at the creation, the holy religions of the Creator Ahura Mazda (Lord of Wisdom), the resplendent and glorious. And we worship Vohu Manah (the Good Mind), and Asha Vahishta (who is Righteousness the Best), and Khshathra-vairya, (the divine Kingdom to be desired), and the good and bountiful Armaiti (true piety in the believers), and Haurvatat and Ameretat (our Weal and Immortality).
Kalki Purana 3:26 By the influence of this horse and parrot, the people of the world will know You as a learned scholar of all scriptures who is a master of the art of releasing arrows, and thus the conqueror of all.
I would consider the rejection of Paul akin to the rejection of Christ. We’ll have to agree to disagree.
There is overwhelming evidence to make a case of where
Paul contradicts Christ, there are
award winning theologians throughout history who have recognized where and why Paul differs.
I don't mind if you have a logical assessment of Paul based on advanced Jewish thinking, that Paul does so on purpose for the sake of removing the Lawless; yet to blindly follow Paul as you like his poetic wording, isn't Godly of me to leave you sinning knowingly...
Thus I accept you disagree; yet will debate the errors until Judgement Day - As like the Bhagavad Gita made clear to Arjuna, that the destruction (Mahapralaya) comes anyway; so we should try to educate righteously before it.
Many have read the others texts but the majority haven’t. Reading and Studying each other’s sacred writings won’t necessarily lead to belief but its an essential starting point.
There is a character defined in multiple textual references who is blind in an eye, and withered in its right arm, who is the definition of the Anti-Christ.
In Zechariah 11:15-17 this character is defined as those who lead the flock, whilst the Diaspora among the Gentiles has taken place.
In the
Sefer of Zerubbabel - Armilus is defined as a False Messiah in Rome, who has taken over the true Messiah's position in the same place ('jesus' Vs "Yeshua").
In the Hadiths the
Al-Masih ad-Dajjal is blind in one eye, and it means the false Messiah.
If people studied the texts, as the texts instructed they are not called Gentiles; otherwise those who are unlettered are lazy and ignorant in ancient times, thus were called Gentiles.
I get in a modern crazy world people are entitled to believe what they want; this is why Christ comes back before Judgement Day, as people are Adharmic (Revelation 16:15-16 => Revelation 3:3).
Unfortunately supersessionism is part of mainstream Islam and Christianity. At least Christianity has some capacity for self reflection and change.
Educated Muslims can accept educated concepts; the problem is Muhammadanism has taken over - if this was at an academic level, where the Messiah corrected it, I believe it could be changed.
Christianity (
John,
Paul, and
Simon) is a deliberate contradiction to establish that some people can be hypocritical; it created the supersession about the fake idol 'jesus', when Yeshua is a fulfilment of many of the world's religious ideas, the wise men were Zoroastrian, and Yehoshua was King David reincarnated, therefore it wasn't replacing - it was more establishing prophecy was real.
This could happen again, like the Messianic age can be a fulfilment of all religion, and we come to an age of enlightenment through education online, the choice is yours...
It depends if people can be realistic for the fate of humanity to take Messianic prophecy seriously; ultimately it is already prophesied people won't listen (
Quran 43:60-77, etc), and the consequences is the end of humanity soon in the Great Tribulation.
The
Quran 43:65 literally says people will not understand the 2nd coming because of 'Factions/Divisions' i.e the supersession caused the formulation of Muhammadanism; instead of Islam being about Oneness of all religion as One (
Tawheed -
Quran 2:285).
In my opinion.