rrobs
Well-Known Member
All I can say is that I think you are reading way more into what I'm saying than what I'm actually saying. I think that whatever I say will be read through some kind of "hate Christians" filter. Life is not one dimensional. People even less so.This is all, a load of craps.
Science is about we have learned, what we have discovered, and what we can make use of TODAY.
There is no really no point in wildly speculating what science may or may not know in some 2000 years in the future?
Are you really so bloody absurd, that you are going to bring up scientific knowledge that we don’t have being better than today?
What possible use to drag up some imaginary science that won’t exist until 4020?
The only things we can learn is what are in the present, and what science there are in the past.
If there are something in the past that are outdated or incorrect, then have the current fields learned from these errors and presented something that’s better than previous and backed by verifiable evidence?
I am well aware that Abiogenesis isn’t science (because it is still a hypothesis), and there are still some questions unanswered, but science is about seeking answers to those questions, and that can only be done if they seek evidence.
Just about every fields in science, even those already accepted as scientific theories, aren’t complete, and there are more that we can learn, more that we explore or investigate, more that we could discover.
Science allow scientific theories to be incomplete, rrobs. There are still more that we learn about the Earth, this star (our sun), this Solar System, this galaxy, other stars from other galaxies.
Science isn’t scientific endeavors that end learning more.
It is creationists like yourself, that hinder enquiring knowledge, hinder progress, because of your personal religious beliefs and your religious agenda.
Sure we may know more 2000 years from now, but why are you continuously try to block what we can possibly know and learn with Abiogenesis?
You talk of scientists may knowing more 2000 years in the future, and yet, you want scientists to stop investigating the origin of life through Abiogenesis models.
That’s just you being bloody biased, being closed minded and being a hypocrite.
Last edited: