• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What if humans never existed?

Dan From Smithville

What we've got here is failure to communicate.
Staff member
Premium Member
Most of you suppositions have very little to do with how nature works. There is no reason to suppose that only one animal has to be top of the food chain, unless you presume that disease can't kill off the top dog. You also mischaracterize animal waste, which is pretty generally recycled. It's only our human waste, non-biodegradable, that sticks around forever and poisons our world.
I assume by human waste, you are including all the products of our activities beyond bodily waste. Which I would include in that as well.
 

WhyIsThatSo

Well-Known Member
Most of you suppositions have very little to do with how nature works. There is no reason to suppose that only one animal has to be top of the food chain, unless you presume that disease can't kill off the top dog. You also mischaracterize animal waste, which is pretty generally recycled. It's only our human waste, non-biodegradable, that sticks around forever and poisons our world.

I'm pretty sure that when you live in a world where every living thing MUST KILL another living thing
in order to stay "alive"...
that there will inevitably be a "top dog".
 

SoyLeche

meh...
I'm pretty sure that when you live in a world where every living thing MUST KILL another living thing
in order to stay "alive"...
that there will inevitably be a "top dog".
One that likely has parasites that will cause its premature death and bugs and bacteria that will feast on its corpse.
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
If humans never came to be, what animal would have dominated the world? Because one animal has to be at the top of the food chain... And that animal will always overproduce - no escaping it...

Also, would the alternate animal have been more or less environmentally healthy, considering it's appetite, and what it would have eaten. Would the food chain have been altered for the better or worse?

The world would be a better place as it was before humans. The world did fine for billions of years without humans

...What about that animals waste? Would the planet be covered in feces? Because they surely wouldn't have waste management.

Dung beetles
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
If humans never came to be, what animal would have dominated the world? Because one animal has to be at the top of the food chain... And that animal will always overproduce - no escaping it...
No! That's not how ecology works. Predator's lives are precarious. They depend on the availability of prey, who's populations vary and who move about seasonally, and any small injury that impaired a predator's hunting ability, could be fatal.
What do you mean by "dominate?" Do lions dominate hunting dogs? How about hyenas, or leopards? Why must a single predator dominate? Each specializes in a particular hunting style or prey. There may be "top" predators in some places, but none are kings.
There have been predators for hundreds of million years. They've always existed in equilibrium with their prey, otherwise they'd become extinct.
Also, would the alternate animal have been more or less environmentally healthy, considering it's appetite, and what it would have eaten. Would the food chain have been altered for the better or worse?
Alternate animal? Alternate to what?
The natural balance is always in flux; always changing to meet environmental changes.
...What about that animals waste? Would the planet be covered in feces? Because they surely wouldn't have waste management.
Seriously? When has waste ever been a problem? One creature's waste is another's treasure. Waste is food and fertilizer.

Nature functioned quite well, for several billion years, before we came along just yesterday..
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
If humans never came to be, what animal would have dominated the world? Because one animal has to be at the top of the food chain... And that animal will always overproduce - no escaping it...

Also, would the alternate animal have been more or less environmentally healthy, considering it's appetite, and what it would have eaten. Would the food chain have been altered for the better or worse?

...What about that animals waste? Would the planet be covered in feces? Because they surely wouldn't have waste management.
the world is covered in poop
have you seen youtube?

and have you seen?...Planet of the Apes
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
The only areas not inhabited by humans are on the outer fringes of the inhabitable zone. Basically no animals can live there.

There are forests, swamps, and other areas where very few humans live, but there are still many animals.

I know with dinosaurs, they must have dominated the planet to the extreme for them to have produced so much oil that we've been powering billions of combustion engines with their remains for the past 100 years.

...That's a LOT of dead dinosaurs.

Most of the oil comes from *before* the dinosaurs. The dinosaurs contributed very little (if at all) to the oil reserves. Most of the oil was produced by decaying plants.

Saying that dinosaurs were at the top of the food chain is like saying that carnivores or primates are the top of the food chain. The term 'dinosaur' encompasses hundreds (if not thousands) of different species. Some were meat-eating, some were plant-eating. Some were big, and some were small.


It could have easily been any other animal that became 'top' of the food chain. How dirty would that have been, considering there would be no plumbing or toilets?

Probably not all that bad. They didn't have chemical factories or agriculture to put massive amounts of pollutants into the water. The poop would have mostly stayed local and been fertilizer for the plants. Go to any forest. You will see feces around, but nothing like what you seem to be imagining.
 

Cooky

Veteran Member
Saying that dinosaurs were at the top of the food chain is like saying that carnivores or primates are the top of the food chain. The term 'dinosaur' encompasses hundreds (if not thousands) of different species. Some were meat-eating, some were plant-eating. Some were big, and some were small.

So would losing dinosaurs be like losing mammals?
 
If humans never came to be, what animal would have dominated the world? Because one animal has to be at the top of the food chain... And that animal will always overproduce - no escaping it...

Also, would the alternate animal have been more or less environmentally healthy, considering it's appetite, and what it would have eaten. Would the food chain have been altered for the better or worse?

...What about that animals waste? Would the planet be covered in feces? Because they surely wouldn't have waste management.

Neanderthals! Unless you mean "no hominin." Then I'd go with chimps probably. Unless you mean no great apes. Then I'd guess it'd be a while before something evolved to have language, but it'd evolve from a social species that can use tools.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
In terms of numbers, humans are outnumbered by chickens at 23 billion, beetles at 350,000 species and ants at one quadrillion individuals. We are tops at altering the environment though.

I have a love/hate idea with pigs becoming more intelligent. They are so darned delicious.

Pigs are very intelligent though, one of the most intelligent species. Capable of showing care, morality and deception, almost human...

But slow roasted in honey... Yum
 
Top