• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

New discoveries of 'missing links.'

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Prediction from fossil evidence:
Layers containing fossils should show what organisms that both died first, and could leave remains.
Prediction 1: Correct


Prediction 2: Layers would have ratios of isotopes that changed in the former nature.
The pattern of greater/lesser ratios would be all through history in each layer. Those who mistakenly used the ratios for dates beyond the present nature period would come up with very old and wrong numbers.
Prediction 2: Correct.



Two predictions two correct answers.

Evidence for science predicting explaining anything about fossils - ZERO

What has occurred is that science has fraudulently tried to claim credit for the ratios and patterns and fossil record using their religion.
You just agreed that we can date fossils. You may not have realized it, but is exactly what you did.

Trying to play cute can backfire.
 

dad

Undefeated
You just agreed that we can date fossils. You may not have realized it, but is exactly what you did.

Trying to play cute can backfire.
I can. Science can't. There is a pattern and changing ratios of isotopes. The trick is comprehending what they actually mean.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I can. Science can't. There is a pattern and changing ratios of isotopes. The trick is comprehending what they actually mean.

It is the other way around. Just because you won't let yourself understand does not mean that others cannot support their claims. You have no valid explanation for the patter of isotopes. If you can't explain something and the other side can you lose. And "God done did it" is not an explanation.
 

TagliatelliMonster

Veteran Member
Still waiting for you to answer direct questions on the topic. Go back and find the post and answer them.

I see no point in wasting time and energy answering questions, when the one asking the question has no intention of treating the answers with an ounce of intellectual honesty.

I note you didn't even bother to address the point I raised concerning your dogmatism.
I'll take your silence on the matter as a confirmation of my suspicion.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Not too much. Just interested in you using facts in 'scientific' models and not beliefs.
Great! So then we can dismiss you as willfully illogical and get on with our lives.
No point conversing with someone who refuses to be rational.
 

dad

Undefeated
I see no point in wasting time and energy answering questions, when the one asking the question has no intention of treating the answers with an ounce of intellectual honesty.

I note you didn't even bother to address the point I raised concerning your dogmatism.
I'll take your silence on the matter as a confirmation of my suspicion.
No problem. You would be instantly refuted anyhow.
 

dad

Undefeated
Great! So then we can dismiss you as willfully illogical and get on with our lives.
No point conversing with someone who refuses to be rational.
So you admit you cannot use facts in the origin models you want to have considered as science. Fine.
 

TagliatelliMonster

Veteran Member
No problem. You would be instantly refuted anyhow.

Your ostrich defence tactics, don't qualify as refutation

upload_2020-1-22_22-25-22.png
 

TagliatelliMonster

Veteran Member
So you admit you cannot use facts in the origin models you want to have considered as science. Fine.

We can.

It's just that this little bubble of make-belief you've created to protect your dogmatic beliefs, don't allow you to accept facts for what they are.

You just handwave them away with ostrich-style defences and last thursdayism argumentation.

This is why people all you irrational.
 

Bear Wild

Well-Known Member
Great! So then we can dismiss you as willfully illogical and get on with our lives.
No point conversing with someone who refuses to be rational.

You said it perfectly. His misinformation is willful and intentional. Dad twists information around makes up what he wants to believe and says anything just to discredit any intelligent posting. Dad just keeps on typing nonsense. I am beginning to doubt if dad even cares what is in the replies as long as it is to promote dad's agenda to discredit evolution.

Answering dads post is like feeding gremlins after midnight.
 
Top