I don't recall your having responded in this thread;
Ancient Reality
Models are beliefs derived from the interpretation of experiment and expressed chiefly in language.
Science is "real" but people are extrapolating results that never existed. They don't understand the meaning of results or how they are influenced by language. Once you accept the idea that "species" exist it limits your perspective to something akin to a spectrum of an element. Some things are more readily visible from some perspectives than others. From our perspective it's difficult to even see that ALL OBSERVED CHANGE IN "SPECIES" HAS ALWAYS OCCURRED SUDDENLY AND WAS THE RESULT OF BEHAVIOR. No matter how many times I point at examples of these changes such as pigs and dogs some people can't even see that THIS IS EVIDENCE THAT ALL OBSERVED CHANGE IN "SPECIES"
AND IN INDIVIDUALS HAS ALWAYS OCCURRED SUDDENLY AND WAS THE RESULT OF BEHAVIOR or circumstance.
We never see what exists or what is there. We fill in massive gaps with our beliefs. Most scientists are absolutely NO BETTER than most religious people. Meanwhile I believe that the Bible was founded on ancient science that did have a clear understanding of the nature of change in species while Darwin engaged in Look and See Science.
Except that religious beliefs are about experiments and evidence.
Religious belief are based on acceptance through faith, and faith alone.
You cannot observe, measure or test God, and you cannot observe measure or test miracles, spirits.
Gods, spirits, miracles, afterlife, resurrection, reincarnation, Heaven and Hell, are all descriptions of belief and superstitions in the supernatural.
The Bible has nothing to do with science.
All you are doing is just more dishonest conspiracy theory.
In Ancient Reality, you professed that Ancient Science occurred before the Tower of Babel, so if I remember correctly, pre-2000 BCE.
Well, no Hebrew writings about the Bible, like Genesis and Exodus were written before 7th century BCE. So how can the Bible be based on your absurd “Ancient Science”?
Like I have always said, you are nothing more than conspiracy theorist.
Science is about explaining the natural and physical world through natural processes or mechanisms.
Religion and religious beliefs don’t explain anything.
You trying to rebut Evolution, like speciation among species, but where are the explanation about biodiversity in Genesis?
All it used the vague word “kind”?
Like in Genesis 1, it say god created plants on 3rd day, fishes and birds on the 5th day, and land animals that walk or crawl on the 6th. Where are explanations in Genesis of WHAT, HOW or WHY they are diverse?
Lastly it say god created humans, but not how.
The passages are descriptive, but they are not explaining anything. There are nothing scientific in Genesis 1.
Then in Genesis 2, it say god created male human first, then plants, then land animals, and lastly female human. Not only the order in Genesis 2 contradict the order in Genesis 1, but it also say god created from from the ground.
How is possible or natural for lifeless dust to transform into living, breathing adult human male?
It is not only impossible, it is supernatural.
So how can the Bible be based on ancient science, when all I see are just vague descriptions that explain nothing and require to suspend all reality of nature?
Clearly, you don’t understand what science actually explain or do. You are simply spinning more absurd conspiracy theories to justify your religion.
They find us amusing when we're not shooting at them.
