Audie
Veteran Member
I especially like this one:
How there is no size indicated, no references, etc.
Ha. That is nothing. Look at these babes.
https://www.google.com/search?q=fak...hWEKM0KHS94BGgQ_AUoAnoECBcQBA&biw=736&bih=441
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I especially like this one:
How there is no size indicated, no references, etc.
Yes, if you go back to the 1920's and believe that continents just drifted across the
earth you were a lunatic. How could an entire continent just rip through the crust,
and even, why?
And as it is, a lot of novel science IS just lunatic stuff. Only every now and then one
lunatic is onto something. Velikovsky had such lunatic ideas, only they stayed lunatic
ideas. Wegener was considered a lunatic, but his ideas stood the test of time - and
it shows truth is stranger than fiction.
If true, it is one of a meager number of incidents and hardly amounts to the cleansing portrayed by creationists. If one were to buy into that nonsense, you would think they were being chucked out windows and it was raining professors. It isnt. Not even a tiny blip on the radar.
I did better: reformatted to make it extra clear the quotation you used was of course not you, for anyone not knowing better. Thanks for catching that formatting problem!Whoever you are quoting, it is not me. Plz remove this post.
That's just my profile - it's not exactly accurate (!) I was in school when they
discovered sea-floor spreading. Continental drift wasn't on any curriculum
that I know of. Only lunatics believed the continents drifted around the planet.
Evidence for Bigfoot.I especially like this one:
How there is no size indicated, no references, etc.
"Lunatic"
Always the silly hyperbole. It was clear t o anyone looking at
a map that, say, Madigascar looked as if it had broken off.
BUT, in t he absence of any hint of a mechanism, there was
no way to come up with anything but a "doesnt it look like".
Whatever you are trying to get at , exaggeration, vague
reference to a 70 year old article and "examples" that
are not remotely examples do not make your case, rather,
it shows you dont have one and dont know what you
are talking about. Just give it a rest,
And next time, do try to avoid spreading misinformation.
Yeah, I would stick to the lunatic appellation.
The most recent one that comes to mind was one Shechtman being
called a "quasi scientist" for his discovery of quasi-crystals. And none
other than by Nobel winner Lynus Pauling.
Chemist Once Accused of 'Quasi-Science' Wins Nobel For Quasicrystal Discovery
He told his colleagues what he'd seen and they laughed him off... He
was eventually asked to leave his research group for "bringing disgrace"
to its members....
Quote "asked to leave" for SEEING (not theorizing like Wegener) quasi
crystals. Many geologists were "asked to leave" for promoting their views
about continents in collision. Of all the scientific theories that sound lunatic
"continental drift" was right up there.
Whatevs. You are merely being tiresome.
She was talking about the Adam and Eve myth and how that made Jesus necessary. But it is nice to see you admit that is not needed for a Christian belief.
Having stared long and hard at the photo of trilobites, and even run a magnifying glass over it, I can see nothing that looks like a footprint, let alone a human footprint.Mods, if this OP are in the wrong category feel free to move it.
500 Million-Year-Old Human Footprint Fossil Baffles Scientists
How do creationists and evolutionists see this in their own beliefs?
How come that science has not spoken about finding like this the same way they speak of other forms of science?
Are science afraid of saying they are wrong? or does it go deeper than that?
Another case where scrutiny of the evidence reveals creationist claims do not match reality.He does not have even one example, and never will.
The barrier reef guy was not in trouble for what our hero claims
he was, as noted in my quote from the Guardian.
"Dr Ridd was not sacked because of his scientific views.
Dr, Ridd was never gagged or silenced about his scientific vies, a
matter to which he admitted during the court hearing'.
His graduate student was even further from a professor
losing tenure for daring to bring up an unconventional idea.
No way this is fake!Ha. That is nothing. Look at these babes.
https://www.google.com/search?q=fak...hWEKM0KHS94BGgQ_AUoAnoECBcQBA&biw=736&bih=441
Another case where scrutiny of the evidence reveals creationist claims do not match reality.
Are you as surprised about that as I am? Shocked I say. Just shocked.
No way this is fake!