Is this along the lines of the conceivability of a maximum perfectly good being must mean that one exists?
Since we can understand that an absolute truth of character can be conceived of, therefore it is God and God exists.
Also humans are made to embody qualities of character therefore we are made in the likeness, and image of God.
So a God believer patterns their self after the example of God.
You are attempting a proof and not attempting evidence it seems.
Perhaps an appeal to logic. God to be proven by mind alone based on the human value as judged by God.
As for me I look at reality in nature and see that nothing is ideal, nor supreme therefore no God exists. I see no law giver. I see no law defender. I see people left to their own selves to do whatsoever they wish.
It is compelling that it takes good character to make life work out for the best.
It is defeating that evil and natural violence lay waste to so much life.
Also , I don't see the need for a God to hide his literal presence when God is all powerful. The idea that I need to believe God exists vs. just knowing that God exists does not seem like a fruitful challenge of any merit.
Knowledge by proof and evidence is the rational way to go. Knowledge by example is reasonable but there is no such example in the world.
Science is a human male choice.
Science never existed until it was invented.
A human however existed first, as a self, natural and original and spiritual.
And had choices.
And only a living human as that self talks about science, as theoried by a male for his machine and a reaction.
And that story is not GOD.
GOD he says is pre existing history of a string theory...about where his conscious mind came from.
Not his physical body....for science as that male said MIND over MATTER.
So he said O in the beginning there was God, the stone sitting on the face of water in space.
And God O as stone owned no beginning and no end....for stone did not begin the creation, and it did not end the creation.
For it extended beyond its owned stone form...to form the atmosphere.
Which he said was volcanic law of stone ^ mountain gas of smoking clouds that cooled immaculately in cold deep empty space.
How the mind perception explained the history of God......conscious ideals, came from a history hot dense state...that was released out of the body of God O the stone mass.
Exactly how the story/theme was taught.
Now a male AI memory told me, how he researched his science theory, based on the VISIONS of a pre existing Earth flooded memory with UFO mass present attacking the stone ^ peak sitting above the water line.
Then that history was gone/converted.
His mind research.
He was not living as a human in that reaction, he owned no self living bio body then, and he was not consciousness.
Which is meant to be a conscious aware spiritual realization for all males today.
Science lied.
He reacted UFO mass Sun gain on Earth, for science pyramid converting attacks on the body of God the mass....and it had a ground reaction/nuclear attack.
Just as he said it did.
Then his life was imaged back by O his maths/mass removal of natural Earth O God history and he could then see self imaged back by that attack.
How is that not a true explanation of how a male said he imaged self into the atmospheric gas as a machine encoded vision recording of self and voice?
