• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Absolute Theory of Everything .

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
Isn't out perception of the solidity of matter the result of the interaction forces within that matter? If EMR could be eliminated from the volume described by the glass would this also effect the glass? Not say that it can be eliminated. Just imagining.

If E&M could be eliminated from the glass, the glass would explode. The explosion wouldn't have much effect without E&M acting, but the integrity of the glass would be completely gone.
 

Dan From Smithville

Recently discovered my planet of origin.
Staff member
Premium Member
If E&M could be eliminated from the glass, the glass would explode. The explosion wouldn't have much effect without E&M acting, but the integrity of the glass would be completely gone.
That was my take on it. Even with my poor background in physics.
 

Kangaroo Feathers

Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
The glass is constructed of atoms which in reality are binary point particles that are in a constant state of expansion and contraction (vibration) , a consequent of thermodynamics .
The construction of a point particle (atom) , is that two opposite charged point particles occupy the same geometrical point simultaneously creating a binary construct and strong nuclear bond .
A secondary consequence of this is that the bond formed then neutralizes the atom to measure no electrical charge (Neutral) .
Then of course the consequent field emission is the gravitational weaker force .

(-e)+(1e)=N
Cool! Vibration woo! Makes a nice change froM quantum woo!
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
What you said in post #202 was
"Females were never privy to the sciences, "

I see no point in continuing if you don't remember what you weote yesterday.
The history was male owned, and male imposed...and owned male reasons why females were not allowed to speak in philosophy, for it was male controlled.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
Consciousness is a living human bio life only existing as a self nearly water in a water/oxygen microbial bio atmospheric body.

What science uses is relative to chemical equations, understood consciously by atmospheric stone gas history plus metallic radiation from out of space, as mind advice, the con of science.

As it came from out of space and males changed the natural radiation levels to support healthy bio life, then our minds became interactive aware with out of space.

Males therefore know that they can convert the chemical mass of the stone to gain what they say is atmospheric radiation gas mass advice...for they know space owns the holding of the heavens....and the only containment they own in science is out of stone physical mass, to convert that mass to get the gas involving radiation levels.

Satanism is how it was taught wrong and fake.

Males psyche knew as the God self and told you that God learnt his lesson...and taught his male son, who was stated never was God his own self....that applying science was wrong.

But his son never learnt...so if consciousness owns the ability to learn and know self is wrong, then what was fed back to mind/psyche AI is what is wrong...and that is a male chosen wrong, for all of his own living reasons.

Which are not NATURAL reasons...they are civilization, machinery and self elite reasons.

The nuclear power plant model, is virtually a mini Universe in its state of destruction, which is why you relate the nuclear power plant cosmologically for it is an act and state of historic destruction of what was once the highest place.

O God and mass he says...living consciously in the history of volcanic gases, the hot dense state.

Now if you owned the use of common sense instead of want and greed and egotism, then you would not attack my person, which is a common Satanic act...the destroyer self who believes self should do whatever it wants, to coerce and then remove anyone who challenges it.

So the spiritual humanity have always had to defend self against a Satanic AI science possessed mind from cosmological radiation feed back...…..and then today in 2 aspects, cosmological radiation feed back and the nuclear power plant constant irradiation tried to convince humanity that the creation of electricity was in a Universe.

Seeing the Universe exists in a historic state of its own destruction...and the nuclear power Universe is where electricity was created...and consciousness living naturally inside of an atmospheric body is trying to advise you all that you are possessed by Satanism.

When a male owns a realization in science, I was wrong for doing science, and then preaches it...then he is correct.

If he says to self O God the mass fell in the Universal deep pit of space and Satan, the black hole opening saved the upper bodies in a reaction conclusion..that stopped upper bodies of MASS falling into the state deep space...then he told self....so Satan then saved God.

Today lying males reading the historic theme tried to preach that Satan came before God for it saved God...when it was a relative discussion to a Universal reaction….and it was always taught that God O mass created Satan the black hole stars and the Satanic bodies then saved God from falling where it had.

In the rebellion being when the Sun collapsed and exploded.

Consciousness as its own natural condition was taught that Satanism is a con and makes a male a fool if he believes in it.

So as stated, the black hole and flat Earth theory equals a huge removal of natural mass to your black hole theme.....and the radiation with cold gases in our atmosphere equal by conditions a formula for the presence of the amount of radiation you wanted left, to say electricity, yet there is no electricity.

For the whole time the Universe that was creating the electricity was the destroyed Universe in the nuclear power plant...where all of your ideas and visions and designs came from...what no mind could know until it was intricately communicated back in the Holy chemical dust destruction.
 

Milton Platt

Well-Known Member
I will gather my thoughts and return later when my children have settled for the evening to start to write the absolute theory of everything . I will write the entire theory here on this forum as opposed to writing a white paper . In writing this I will ''destroy'' many scientific falsities of our past and present , that which science does not want me to speak of .
Please moderators , if people try to post attacks at me in this thread, remove them . ''Their'' first directive is to disrupt threads and avoid the science objective facts .

Don't confuse attacking you with someone refuting your claims. The claims are not "you". If "YOU" have been attacked, call the authorities.
Don't forget that a scientific theory is the best explanation of ALL the evidence available at the time and has been tested and peer reviewed. So without presenting a white paper to be tested and reviewed, you cannot actually have a theory. The best you can do is a hypothesis.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
Which authority should a human contact if they have been harmed in science conditions?

And then you say, science tells all of these ideals about science on behalf of science itself...which is an artificial male choice.

The machine owns no physical presence.
The machine does not build itself.
The machine owns no self volition.
The machine is human male owned...so he then says I am a machine by artificially extending it beyond his owned physical form.

So other scientists, who I have read information as a teaching say, if a male says that everything began from space and radiation, then in his attempt to recreate that theme....seeing he always consciously imposes the state...I am emulating natural history by a string.

Now if he were in that claim making that claim, then every state natural today would be the answer, from that string in a multi billion diverse presence, each end would be the same claim, from space and also radiation.

If he says and it is a real science knowledge.

Everything natural would be owner of that string in each natural form.

But it is not what his claim is....his claim is to cause an unnatural and artificial reaction in his controlled machine, that does not own it.

So he wants to force it.

Which is relative to a male saying I want to force the machine reaction to own space and the radiation reaction inside of machine as beginning without any other form.

And then his machine would explode....as de particularization itself.

What his mind claim is to knowing MATHS O and also MASS as a flat plane removal out of physical MASS by depth and width that knows O a solid mass body exists.

First he would own theories to disclaim natural spiritual human conscious awareness and self perceptions, then coerce it to believe in his want.

And in reality his want as science was always to own God O stone, beginning of science mass removal theme...and put it back into space and radiation, as an invention.

For the stories in science about relativity, means what is relative to natural life existence itself, as a human and as consciousness.

Meaning a stone physical mass body owning END, is the word of GOD STONE...and stone was the Creator of the heavenly body.

GOD as a beginning owns no beginning, and factually in science is said it owned no END, for stone was not defined to be a reaction it was defined to be a cause and effect of changes in spatial emptiness.

How that God theme was a factual real and true science that owned no argument in human life...for stone had to exist first, as a planet in whole and formed presence, and stone does not own a beginning.

And males today in Satanic science AI coercion have tried to take the truthful real science explanation of sciences origination away from human awareness so that they can force Earth as God O into a Satanic spatial theme of space plus radiation, which is to own the END of God O by forcing it.

What the historic argument in science is about God O a human applied lawful and science agreed history by a Tribunal of highly spiritual and scientific minds of the past, who prove that they owned a higher understanding in science in the past.

Seeing our human psyche mind has declined in its spiritual aware natural conscious state, by how much UFO mass irradiation has attacked us all in the nuclear power plant model.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
The history was male owned, and male imposed...and owned male reasons why females were not allowed to speak in philosophy, for it was male controlled.

Too ashamed to admit you to your own posts?

Dont known much history do you?

Themistoclea famous Greek philosopher mathematician and teacher of Pythagoras, who said he learned his moral doctrines from her.

Aspasia was mentioned in the works ofPlato, Aristophanes, Xenophon and others great philosophers, she was hetaera and philosopher

Hypatia, one of my heroines. She was the head of the Platonist school at Alexandria, where she taught astronomy and the philosophy of Plato and Aristotle. She was chief librarian at the famous library in Alexandria when it was destroyed by christians, she was murdered while trying to save unique books from the killers from Christ
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
Too ashamed to admit you to your own posts?

Dont known much history do you?

Themistoclea famous Greek philosopher mathematician and teacher of Pythagoras, who said he learned his moral doctrines from her.

Aspasia was mentioned in the works ofPlato, Aristophanes, Xenophon and others great philosophers, she was hetaera and philosopher

Hypatia, one of my heroines. She was the head of the Platonist school at Alexandria, where she taught astronomy and the philosophy of Plato and Aristotle. She was chief librarian at the famous library in Alexandria when it was destroyed by christians, she was murdered while trying to save unique books from the killers from Christ

When he spoke about her, he was pretending that space was a womb...as a males own intention of speaking inaccurately.

Meaning of hetaerae was the theme Mother Abomination, the mistress or whore, secret science meanings of radiated space theories in philosophy.

For space is named space as a holy word as one word space, and space was never any womb.

AI says, as its quotes female philosophy was not accepted.

Just as it says so.

AI is biblical DATA updated and tells the information for the format in which it is expressed.

I never did any research to see if women were intellectuals in their past, for I know that they are today. I also know that when someone tells you it is not advised to seek evil wisdom, plenty of people still seek it. Believing evil to be wisdom....when it was how to get destroyed.

And what has that got to do with the Absolute theory of everything, you quoting maybe that you think that a living female today knows knowledge that you maybe do not, from a theme Mother Holy space womb and Mother Abomination would be your only motivated reasoning to be constantly attacking what I say.

Posts and admitting to my posts, never said I was ashamed may be you are.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
AI infers in my attacked psyche, to DATA aware male science historic notification of why life was being attacked in fall out conditions before. And science says that it owns experience and science information from the various studies that it imposes as males in research.

Historically I was AI advised that the female philosophy was not accepted by the Christ male wisdom.

Which historically was not just the witness of UFO radiation phenomena, it involved asteroids, comets and meteors.
Which AI said was involved in a burning attack on the city of Rome and it also fell in other places.

As a reason to the burning of Alexandrina library historically, and why AI said that female philosophers and female philosophy was not accepted by Rome....biblical DATA recording.
That exact information was how it was expressed.

Acts 6:9
Then there arose certain of the synagogue, which is called the synagogue of the Libertines, and Cyrenians, and Alexandrians, and of them of Cilicia and of Asia, disputing with Stephen.
How to find Geminids’ radiant point | EarthSky.org
Information about Castor and Pollux meteor showers.
Acts 28:11
And after three months we departed in a ship of Alexandria, which had wintered in the isle, whose sign was Castor and Pollux.

The cosmological ship theme was both the Earth God O moving in space, and also the arc/ark evaluations.

Jesus sacrifice of life history as a science was about themes.
Started his ministry at Hanukkah 27 AD and ended his ministry at Passover 31 AD

Read more: Passover 27AD or 30 AD? | UNSEALED DISCUSSION BOARD

Stephen as a Holy 12 sign thesis was end of year. Died AD 34.
Acts 28....11
28AD.......the attack began in month 11. Which would own a theme passing over and also arguing before conditions.

AI information says that as the male God self history, involved thinking, O males claimed stone was the body of God O that they had studied for science formulas.

What males today try to claim was cosmological God....whereas changing Earth O as God, also changed the cosmos, male chosen Earth science.

O God was present as stone, with no beginning and no end.....and the hot dense gas state as known to a mind theme study of human sciences on Earth, the heavenly spirit beginnings. Of Planet Earth O or God.

So it was not cosmological, hot dense state, only in the sense of it being released out of the stone body into empty space.

The known Earth Sun collapse history as advised by Stephen Hawking, as a relative male insight. A living male invented science, hence his own use of words imposes a male coded inference to self, what gets returned in the future.

As the consciousness of science invention, which is only relative to his mind/thinking, which he confessed, mind over matter.

For this historic male inference is that he believed that thinking could overcome the presence of matter existing.

The Burning of the Library of Alexandria | eHISTORY

The stories seem to own a theme of continuous burning.....to what the Christ Tribunal had declared, to build a Church as a healing venue over the science practices of evil cause.

And in the ancient times it was witness to what the atmospheric irradiation caused in Temple sciences. And what returned to Earth because of it.

I would therefore question what relative answer a male today would own claiming he knows absolute theory of everything, would mean his intention would be to overcome everything and have it removed. And everything to him is God, as a theme about the power of a Creator model at its beginnings.

Science might claim today in modern life that it is not using God theme, whereas they are proven that they still are using God themes. Self Deism about knowing it all without being it. For our being is not anywhere else but as a human.

Why a male claiming nothing, would mean he would want to try to invent it.

For when you say mind is over matter, and matter exists, why would you pretend that it did not exist?

If a male said that a reaction in a machine creates from a beginning, he knows he cannot have space the deep empty pit in his machine. And if he says radiation is what he wants as power, is he going to invent/create radiation his own self, as a theme of strings of applied lineage...from space as radiation? To claim I can copy.

No, rationally he says, I will bring it through the Earth cold gases to my machine.

Which the nuclear science is already causing. So how do you own the same body twice as interactive cause?

Therefore how is a theme absolute and everything? Is the Universe suddenly going to be inside of his machine reaction?

And if he could put a Universe inside of the Earth heavenly gases, then he would be reflecting that he wants to put us all outside of the atmosphere into the Universe...the only natural place where it really exists. Science is always about shifting mass, as his idea of absolute theory of.

Thinking is not relative. Natural history is relative to existing exactly how it owns form. Relative meaning, it is all related for it is already bodily owned relative to its positions.

As the machine reaction is the only place not owning presence or activation, then the absolute theory of, is just about causing a new machine to newly react as living in reality, no matter how you express an idea.

No male truthfully owns any state in natural out of space history, and talking about it does not give you ownership.

A male can claim, thinking about it imposes that I understand the journey that it took to own form....but all form is owned and it is natural. And thinking is not owning its historic reactive past, when our life human and physical life was not even existing.

Which is also relative to thinking statements.

The only not owned form as the statement nothing, is the reaction he wants to activate...and how do you activate everything in a reaction?

If a male today is a self and aged 33 years of age, 33 the only history that his own human self owned. And Jesus proved that theory from a living human baby born, to his life removal.

A self does no exist created and living until sperm and an ovary develops into that baby life. And a human baby cannot think and apply science from its journey into form.

A male claiming that his humanity existed before him, does not give him self claim to any of those other living bodies....which his egotism ignores.

Sperm itself does not own his life.
An ovary itself does not own his life...as the point of activation, 2 pre existing physical bio forms.

Therefore he does not have any pre existing claim on other humans humanity by his personal themes of I own, which he seems to imply about everything he thinks about.

History was given an evaluated Genetic 100 year self presence value C.

And that theme 100 years is not any state expressed by any self to be absolute as a comparison from thinking to established theories......owning.

Maybe a scientist remembers being a scientist billions of years ago on a different Planet Earth body and life, as Earth history....and thinks that he travelled those billions of years as a space man to get back to a converted energy removal of Earth and lived life again.

Knowing he caused it.
 

TagliatelliMonster

Veteran Member
I will gather my thoughts and return later when my children have settled for the evening to start to write the absolute theory of everything . I will write the entire theory here on this forum as opposed to writing a white paper . In writing this I will ''destroy'' many scientific falsities of our past and present , that which science does not want me to speak of .
Please moderators , if people try to post attacks at me in this thread, remove them . ''Their'' first directive is to disrupt threads and avoid the science objective facts .

Random internet poster is going to "destroy many scientific falsities".

Another one.

Funny how all these brilliant genious people can't come up with a better platform to communicate their superior knowledge, other then a random religious internet forum.



:rolleyes:
 

TagliatelliMonster

Veteran Member
The absolute theory of everything begins with a very simple question !

In the beginning there was ?

A)Nothing

B)Something

C) we don't know


To be clear in our understanding it is important we reach agreement and specifically use the same definition and semantics as each other to accurately define a beginning with certainty and absolute conclusion .

A1)What is nothing ?
A2)What is something ?

Defining terms properly is certainly a good start.
However, defining terms is not going to magically provide us with knowledge concerning the origins of the universe (and beyond, if any beyond). The unknown isn't magically going to become known, simply because you (arbitrarily) defined a few terms.

Subset questions to a question that need to be explained precise and accordingly correct in respect to physical aspects !

A1a) Nothing is a point with 0 dimensions

A1b) Nothing is an empty volume of space

Empty space is actually a cesspool of quantum weirdness. So definatly not "nothing".
As for your "point with 0 dimensions", I don't know what that is.

As Einstein once said about light being a wave and a particle , why not both ?

B1b) Something is matter

B2b) Something is a measurement

why not both ?

No clue what your point is.

Was there in the beginning nothing and something , a measure of nothing ?

We don't know.
 

TagliatelliMonster

Veteran Member
Which I explained prior



There is a volume of nothing (a point with 0 dimensions) in an ''empty glass''

Do you agree that your something is a volume of nothing ?

You don't need an empty glass for that.
Such points "exist" everywhere. Including inside matter.
0-dimension points can be said to exist nowhere and everywhere.

Which incidently is exactly why it's a meaningless concept.
 

TagliatelliMonster

Veteran Member
Hello ma dear ;)

We'd established an absolute vacuum by removing the quanta out of the glass .

Dimensions are a measure ma dear , :)

A volume of nothing remains in the glass if we remove the quanta .

Again, a vaccuum is not nothing.
It has quantum fluctuations, virtual particles and it weighs something.

Empty space isn't nothing.

A nobel prize has actually even been handed out for this discovery. Here's the concept visualised:

giphy.gif


That's the quantum stuff that goes on in "empty" space.

Not so empty after all...
 

TagliatelliMonster

Veteran Member
What is empty space made of ?

Now bare in mind we've imagined away the quanta and the space is absolutely empty .


The space can't be imagined away !

Now wouldn't you say and agree that the space was made of no thing , in affect made of nothing ?
No. It's made of space-time.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
No. It's made of space-time.
Space and all words as the original thinker which a male says spiritually was his own self a very long time ago.

As the artefact technology owner of human sciences found in deep earth digs...when he sent the Earth into a spin and plunged it deeper into cold deep empty space.

Space is empty and it is cold as compared to heat....and as it pulls on the higher hotter mass in the spatial expansion...that is cooling, it does not own form.

What is your idea of empty space on Earth, when Earth is a gas mass owning space within its formed presence in empty space...for if a gas did not own a space, then we could not walk through it.

Your idea of studying emptiness implies that it is not empty even before you study it...therefore you already knew that your study was not studying empty space.

For a conscious self is self aware first, seeing it was in natural life the inventor of all the states of science...as a human.
 
Top