antisexuality

"And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham." - Matthew 3:9, King James Bible

Sexuality is digusting where I live, because of its unsolicited and highly promoted nature. I was on the train today, and saw two advertisements pertaining to marriage and dating. There are some people who'd be killed by hate gangs for dating. Some people can't even legally marry, where I live.

I like air. Air is all around us, naturally. Air is beneficial. Nobody needs to coerce the distribution of air.

Sex is all around me, but I'm not sure if it's natural. Even if it's natural, that does not mean that it is acceptable or morally correct. Some people can't have sex without breaking religious laws. Sex spreads disease. Nobody would easily voluntarily engage in an activity that spreads disease. Naturally, some people probably would not want sex nor have sex: I am a virgin.

So sex is still all around me, but through somewhat artificial means. Someone had put the romantic sexual advertisements of dating and marriage on the train. Those advertisements didn't spawn naturally. My city gives marriage benefits. There are sexual restrictions to marriage. That connection between marriage and sex proves that marriage is sexual where I live, even because a husband (who can't have sex with other women) would then be very pressured to have sex with his wife due to the local romantic sexual promotion. I've even heard of the term, "maritial rape."

The only good thing of sex is a child. But even a mother can die during labor or childbirth. A baby can die or be unhealthy upon delivery. Or a child can grow to kill his parents, even though christianity tries to prevent this. So there is only a very small likely benefit to sex, a human experiement, in comparison to its many dangers.

Sex is naturally dangerous and bad. And yet for the sake of sowing and reaping children, some societies promote sexuality. They allow romantic sexual advertisements on trains. They give benefits to romantic sexual couples who can produce kids. They teach unsatisfactory sexual education too late, especially knowing that rape and sex crimes are a huge issue for women in a neighborhood. Some societies want people to have sex so that their chldren can be used for armies, labor forces, and materials; and don't care if women die during childbirth or a wild rapist is loss. Even some businesses profit from sex too, through prostitution or romantic sexual advertisements; because some men are victims to lust and have weak self-control.

And that is why I feel that sexuality is disgusting. Luckily I'm strengthening my self control so that I won't be abused by neither societies nor businesses. I can adopt a child to help secure my future: I don't need to have sex.

Christians know that only the Almighty has the true power to grant life. Some societies count populations and encourage sex, to grow and maintain populations. But the Almighty can create human life from stones. And societies, who depend on sex and men, will soon be counting the ever-plagues of the Almighty.

There is always the Orgasmatron

Perhaps if there were more sex there would be less violence and discord.
It works for bonobos.

Genesis 1:28....”God blessed them and said to them [Adam & Eve, a married couple], "Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it....”

That command sort of requires sex.

And keeping sex between married couples only, each couple being mutually exclusive....that would negate any spread of disease!

wjf said:

"And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham." - Matthew 3:9, King James Bible

Sexuality is digusting where I live, because of its unsolicited and highly promoted nature. I was on the train today, and saw two advertisements pertaining to marriage and dating. There are some people who'd be killed by hate gangs for dating. Some people can't even legally marry, where I live.

I like air. Air is all around us, naturally. Air is beneficial. Nobody needs to coerce the distribution of air.

Sex is all around me, but I'm not sure if it's natural. Even if it's natural, that does not mean that it is acceptable or morally correct. Some people can't have sex without breaking religious laws. Sex spreads disease. Nobody would easily voluntarily engage in an activity that spreads disease. Naturally, some people probably would not want sex nor have sex: I am a virgin.

So sex is still all around me, but through somewhat artificial means. Someone had put the romantic sexual advertisements of dating and marriage on the train. Those advertisements didn't spawn naturally. My city gives marriage benefits. There are sexual restrictions to marriage. That connection between marriage and sex proves that marriage is sexual where I live, even because a husband (who can't have sex with other women) would then be very pressured to have sex with his wife due to the local romantic sexual promotion. I've even heard of the term, "maritial rape."

The only good thing of sex is a child. But even a mother can die during labor or childbirth. A baby can die or be unhealthy upon delivery. Or a child can grow to kill his parents, even though christianity tries to prevent this. So there is only a very small likely benefit to sex, a human experiement, in comparison to its many dangers.

Sex is naturally dangerous and bad. And yet for the sake of sowing and reaping children, some societies promote sexuality. They allow romantic sexual advertisements on trains. They give benefits to romantic sexual couples who can produce kids. They teach unsatisfactory sexual education too late, especially knowing that rape and sex crimes are a huge issue for women in a neighborhood. Some societies want people to have sex so that their chldren can be used for armies, labor forces, and materials; and don't care if women die during childbirth or a wild rapist is loss. Even some businesses profit from sex too, through prostitution or romantic sexual advertisements; because some men are victims to lust and have weak self-control.

And that is why I feel that sexuality is disgusting. Luckily I'm strengthening my self control so that I won't be abused by neither societies nor businesses. I can adopt a child to help secure my future: I don't need to have sex.

Christians know that only the Almighty has the true power to grant life. Some societies count populations and encourage sex, to grow and maintain populations. But the Almighty can create human life from stones. And societies, who depend on sex and men, will soon be counting the ever-plagues of the Almighty.

Click to expand...

I think you need to see a sex-therapist if you think sex is so disgusting. We'd hardly be here without it and nature no doubt ensured an over-supply of future generations by making is so pleasurable. At your (apparent) age I suspect you can at least change your attitude.

wjf said:

"And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham." - Matthew 3:9, King James Bible

Sexuality is digusting where I live, because of its unsolicited and highly promoted nature. I was on the train today, and saw two advertisements pertaining to marriage and dating. There are some people who'd be killed by hate gangs for dating. Some people can't even legally marry, where I live.

I like air. Air is all around us, naturally. Air is beneficial. Nobody needs to coerce the distribution of air.

Sex is all around me, but I'm not sure if it's natural. Even if it's natural, that does not mean that it is acceptable or morally correct. Some people can't have sex without breaking religious laws. Sex spreads disease. Nobody would easily voluntarily engage in an activity that spreads disease. Naturally, some people probably would not want sex nor have sex: I am a virgin.

So sex is still all around me, but through somewhat artificial means. Someone had put the romantic sexual advertisements of dating and marriage on the train. Those advertisements didn't spawn naturally. My city gives marriage benefits. There are sexual restrictions to marriage. That connection between marriage and sex proves that marriage is sexual where I live, even because a husband (who can't have sex with other women) would then be very pressured to have sex with his wife due to the local romantic sexual promotion. I've even heard of the term, "maritial rape."

The only good thing of sex is a child. But even a mother can die during labor or childbirth. A baby can die or be unhealthy upon delivery. Or a child can grow to kill his parents, even though christianity tries to prevent this. So there is only a very small likely benefit to sex, a human experiement, in comparison to its many dangers.

Sex is naturally dangerous and bad. And yet for the sake of sowing and reaping children, some societies promote sexuality. They allow romantic sexual advertisements on trains. They give benefits to romantic sexual couples who can produce kids. They teach unsatisfactory sexual education too late, especially knowing that rape and sex crimes are a huge issue for women in a neighborhood. Some societies want people to have sex so that their chldren can be used for armies, labor forces, and materials; and don't care if women die during childbirth or a wild rapist is loss. Even some businesses profit from sex too, through prostitution or romantic sexual advertisements; because some men are victims to lust and have weak self-control.

And that is why I feel that sexuality is disgusting. Luckily I'm strengthening my self control so that I won't be abused by neither societies nor businesses. I can adopt a child to help secure my future: I don't need to have sex.

Christians know that only the Almighty has the true power to grant life. Some societies count populations and encourage sex, to grow and maintain populations. But the Almighty can create human life from stones. And societies, who depend on sex and men, will soon be counting the ever-plagues of the Almighty.

Click to expand...

You are missing out on so much.

Sex is enjoyable, sex is health giving in several different ways, sex helps cement relationships.

And of course life would have died out on this ball of rock soon after it got started.

Yes, orgasms is a notable feature of sex. A man apparently has to have an orgasm, in order to give his seeds. And so it seems that men have to be sexually aroused for sex and the production of children. However, there are men who have been sexually aroused without the influence of women, and some societies have burned and killed those men. Some societies find efficency in having a man become sexually aroused near a lady, since his seeds have to be put within a lady. But I know there are men who can reach orgasm without women, mankind can learn of ways of securing seeds without orgasm, and lust and sadomasochism are barriers preventing civil and safe reproductive practices.


We are not bonobos. More sex would likely cause more harm than aid. Sex grows diseases, disrespects homosexuals, allows discrimination, perverts gender, facilitates rape, kills mothers and babies, and enslaves women.


We are not Adam and Eve. Adam and Eve were blessed with the presence, voice, and fatherhood of the Almighty. The two existed before the great perversion of the world, and lived in a grand garden, away from societal influences, under the authority of the Almighty. Also, fertility and childbirth labor was a curse given unto Eve because she gave a forbidden fruit to Adam, and may not have been the intended course of mankind. Also, increasing in number and having sex can be two different things. A man can have a lot of sex but never produce a child from it all. And a woman can never have sex, but be pregnant with child like Virgin Mary. Nowadays, a society can be fruitful and increase in number through artificial insemination. You are free to have sex, but I will not have sex because I get treated differently for sex than you do: and that societal discrimination is why I hate sex even more.


I would rather save my money and not see a sex therapist. I have a right to hate sex like any rape victim or LGBTQI+ member. If I hated tennis, nobody would say that I need to go to a tennis therapist. I have the right to hate an activity. You might as well tell me to go to a therapist for being LGBTQI+, if I weren't straight. My nature of hating sex is a result of unsolicited sexual content: I would not hate sex so much if it wasn't being thrown in my face every single day. My hate is similar to a lady being sent unsolicited photos of private parts, every single day and regardless of her precautions of avoiding such unsolicited sexuality.


"Sex is enjoyable" is subjective. Some men find joy within themselves, but I find shared joy. I do not find joy in having sex with a female actor. I do not find joy in chancing a terminal disease or buying a terminal disease. I do not find joy in having sex with an unconscious woman who drank too much. I do not find joy in having sex with someone who can falsely charge me with rape because of my skin color, race, or gender. I do not find joy in pressuring a lesbian to accept my flirting. I do not find joy in endangering a wife with my consented flirting where her husband might kill her.

I find joy in a lady's freedom to avoid disease or pregnancy complications. I find joy in knowing a woman won't have to touch a man in order to feed herself and her children that resulted from a rape. I find joy in not making women subject to human experiments. Sex is a human experiment: nobody knows the outcome of pregnancy where sometimes a mother might die during childbirth or give birth to a dead baby.

wjf said:

"And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham." - Matthew 3:9, King James Bible

Sexuality is digusting where I live, because of its unsolicited and highly promoted nature. I was on the train today, and saw two advertisements pertaining to marriage and dating. There are some people who'd be killed by hate gangs for dating. Some people can't even legally marry, where I live.

I like air. Air is all around us, naturally. Air is beneficial. Nobody needs to coerce the distribution of air.

Sex is all around me, but I'm not sure if it's natural. Even if it's natural, that does not mean that it is acceptable or morally correct. Some people can't have sex without breaking religious laws. Sex spreads disease. Nobody would easily voluntarily engage in an activity that spreads disease. Naturally, some people probably would not want sex nor have sex: I am a virgin.

So sex is still all around me, but through somewhat artificial means. Someone had put the romantic sexual advertisements of dating and marriage on the train. Those advertisements didn't spawn naturally. My city gives marriage benefits. There are sexual restrictions to marriage. That connection between marriage and sex proves that marriage is sexual where I live, even because a husband (who can't have sex with other women) would then be very pressured to have sex with his wife due to the local romantic sexual promotion. I've even heard of the term, "maritial rape."

The only good thing of sex is a child. But even a mother can die during labor or childbirth. A baby can die or be unhealthy upon delivery. Or a child can grow to kill his parents, even though christianity tries to prevent this. So there is only a very small likely benefit to sex, a human experiement, in comparison to its many dangers.

Sex is naturally dangerous and bad. And yet for the sake of sowing and reaping children, some societies promote sexuality. They allow romantic sexual advertisements on trains. They give benefits to romantic sexual couples who can produce kids. They teach unsatisfactory sexual education too late, especially knowing that rape and sex crimes are a huge issue for women in a neighborhood. Some societies want people to have sex so that their chldren can be used for armies, labor forces, and materials; and don't care if women die during childbirth or a wild rapist is loss. Even some businesses profit from sex too, through prostitution or romantic sexual advertisements; because some men are victims to lust and have weak self-control.

And that is why I feel that sexuality is disgusting. Luckily I'm strengthening my self control so that I won't be abused by neither societies nor businesses. I can adopt a child to help secure my future: I don't need to have sex.

Christians know that only the Almighty has the true power to grant life. Some societies count populations and encourage sex, to grow and maintain populations. But the Almighty can create human life from stones. And societies, who depend on sex and men, will soon be counting the ever-plagues of the Almighty.

Click to expand...

Relax, when your True Love arrives, all your fears will disappear. Sex will become a natural thing. Few things in life can compare to a close intimate spiritual relationship. I wouldn't be in such a hurry to give that up.

Patience. Sometimes True Love will not show up until later in life when you will be ready. Always be open for True Love tends to show up when you least expect it.

Finally, it doesn't matter what everyone else chooses to do, It what you do that counts. Each of us are Special in ways you can't imagine. Be who you must! It's a part of the plan!

Do not allow others to control or intimidate you. You will be OK regardless of their actions.

Yes, that's what I see. It's very clear.

wjf said:

"And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham." - Matthew 3:9, King James Bible

Sexuality is digusting where I live, because of its unsolicited and highly promoted nature. I was on the train today, and saw two advertisements pertaining to marriage and dating. There are some people who'd be killed by hate gangs for dating. Some people can't even legally marry, where I live.

I like air. Air is all around us, naturally. Air is beneficial. Nobody needs to coerce the distribution of air.

Sex is all around me, but I'm not sure if it's natural. Even if it's natural, that does not mean that it is acceptable or morally correct. Some people can't have sex without breaking religious laws. Sex spreads disease. Nobody would easily voluntarily engage in an activity that spreads disease. Naturally, some people probably would not want sex nor have sex: I am a virgin.

So sex is still all around me, but through somewhat artificial means. Someone had put the romantic sexual advertisements of dating and marriage on the train. Those advertisements didn't spawn naturally. My city gives marriage benefits. There are sexual restrictions to marriage. That connection between marriage and sex proves that marriage is sexual where I live, even because a husband (who can't have sex with other women) would then be very pressured to have sex with his wife due to the local romantic sexual promotion. I've even heard of the term, "maritial rape."

The only good thing of sex is a child. But even a mother can die during labor or childbirth. A baby can die or be unhealthy upon delivery. Or a child can grow to kill his parents, even though christianity tries to prevent this. So there is only a very small likely benefit to sex, a human experiement, in comparison to its many dangers.

Sex is naturally dangerous and bad. And yet for the sake of sowing and reaping children, some societies promote sexuality. They allow romantic sexual advertisements on trains. They give benefits to romantic sexual couples who can produce kids. They teach unsatisfactory sexual education too late, especially knowing that rape and sex crimes are a huge issue for women in a neighborhood. Some societies want people to have sex so that their chldren can be used for armies, labor forces, and materials; and don't care if women die during childbirth or a wild rapist is loss. Even some businesses profit from sex too, through prostitution or romantic sexual advertisements; because some men are victims to lust and have weak self-control.

And that is why I feel that sexuality is disgusting. Luckily I'm strengthening my self control so that I won't be abused by neither societies nor businesses. I can adopt a child to help secure my future: I don't need to have sex.

Christians know that only the Almighty has the true power to grant life. Some societies count populations and encourage sex, to grow and maintain populations. But the Almighty can create human life from stones. And societies, who depend on sex and men, will soon be counting the ever-plagues of the Almighty.

Click to expand...

I suggest therapy. We're a sexually reproducing species that also has evolved to enjoy sex purely for pleasure and bonding. It's our strongest instinct behind eating, drinking and automatic functions such as breathing. What's unnatural is your unhealthy perspective on sexuality. That can change, though. I do have pity since I have experienced the same sort of thoughts. It was due to the abusive situation I grew up in and compounded by neurotically anti-sex religions like Christianity. But there's hope for healing.

@Bird123 When my True Love arrives, I will give her the gift of friendship and equality. I won't pressure her to have sex, nor deprive her of her rights simply because of her gender or lack of sexuality. I can have a very powerful relationship with a woman, without having to invade her privacy or chance her death during childbirth. Many women value a friend more than a boyfriend, including lesbians.

Because sadly, women get raped and some societies need children. If a lady refuses sex, she can't easily just live on the streets like the average homeless, because some societies NEED her to produce children. She will likely be raped, and so she searches for some security, even the security from social relationships, to protect her from such targeted rape. She sometimes even endures marital rape, as at least she's not getting raped by a complete stranger who'd give her unknown sexually transmitted diseases. But I can try to protect a woman from rape without having sex with her: I can be a good friend and treat her like a fellow brother.

And yes, relationships have an influence on sexuality, where I live. A man who's married can not legally have sex with other women, where I live. The same custom is common in boyfriend-girlfriend relationships. Why does sex have an impact on love? I would not care if my girlfriend had multiple boyfriends and sex partners. However, some societies DO care. Some societies (either to preserve a certain race or culture, or to somewhat prevent disease,) restrict the sexuality of married persons and intimate partners. But in doing so, they then add pressure on a husband to have sex with his wife, since he can't have sex with anyone else. Then add the unsolicited sexuality and unsolicited romantic sexual content advertised within some societies, (especially from businesses of sexual exploitation,) and . . . I am not surprised that marital rape exists. I am not against the religious sexual restrictions on married coupes, hence why I just avoid marriage altogether and remain a virgin. Some men have certain levels of self-control where they can live lives as virgins.

@Saint Frankenstein I would rather save my money and not see a therapist. I have a right to hate sex like any rape victim or LGBTQI+ member. If I hated tennis, nobody would say that I need to go to a therapist. I have the right to hate an activity. You might as well tell me to go to a therapist for being LGBTQI+, if I weren't straight. My nature of hating sex is a result of unsolicited sexual content: I would not hate sex so much if it wasn't being thrown in my face every single day. My hate is similar to a lady being sent unsolicited photos of private parts, every single day and regardless of her precautions of avoiding such unsolicited sexuality.

ChristineM said:

You are missing out on so much.

Sex is enjoyable, sex is health giving in several different ways, sex helps cement relationships.

And of course life would have died out on this ball of rock soon after it got started.

Click to expand...

Sexual inclinations are a kind of weakness. Basically, it's getting "high" on someone.

One with the fullest of control over their emotions would use it wisely.

wjf said:

"And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham." - Matthew 3:9, King James Bible

Sexuality is digusting where I live, because of its unsolicited and highly promoted nature. I was on the train today, and saw two advertisements pertaining to marriage and dating. There are some people who'd be killed by hate gangs for dating. Some people can't even legally marry, where I live.

I like air. Air is all around us, naturally. Air is beneficial. Nobody needs to coerce the distribution of air.

Sex is all around me, but I'm not sure if it's natural. Even if it's natural, that does not mean that it is acceptable or morally correct. Some people can't have sex without breaking religious laws. Sex spreads disease. Nobody would easily voluntarily engage in an activity that spreads disease. Naturally, some people probably would not want sex nor have sex: I am a virgin.

So sex is still all around me, but through somewhat artificial means. Someone had put the romantic sexual advertisements of dating and marriage on the train. Those advertisements didn't spawn naturally. My city gives marriage benefits. There are sexual restrictions to marriage. That connection between marriage and sex proves that marriage is sexual where I live, even because a husband (who can't have sex with other women) would then be very pressured to have sex with his wife due to the local romantic sexual promotion. I've even heard of the term, "maritial rape."

The only good thing of sex is a child. But even a mother can die during labor or childbirth. A baby can die or be unhealthy upon delivery. Or a child can grow to kill his parents, even though christianity tries to prevent this. So there is only a very small likely benefit to sex, a human experiement, in comparison to its many dangers.

Sex is naturally dangerous and bad. And yet for the sake of sowing and reaping children, some societies promote sexuality. They allow romantic sexual advertisements on trains. They give benefits to romantic sexual couples who can produce kids. They teach unsatisfactory sexual education too late, especially knowing that rape and sex crimes are a huge issue for women in a neighborhood. Some societies want people to have sex so that their chldren can be used for armies, labor forces, and materials; and don't care if women die during childbirth or a wild rapist is loss. Even some businesses profit from sex too, through prostitution or romantic sexual advertisements; because some men are victims to lust and have weak self-control.

And that is why I feel that sexuality is disgusting. Luckily I'm strengthening my self control so that I won't be abused by neither societies nor businesses. I can adopt a child to help secure my future: I don't need to have sex.

Christians know that only the Almighty has the true power to grant life. Some societies count populations and encourage sex, to grow and maintain populations. But the Almighty can create human life from stones. And societies, who depend on sex and men, will soon be counting the ever-plagues of the Almighty.

Click to expand...

Japanese / Australian love dolls Animated , affectionate, always have the time without the hangups.

~Disclaimer~

Love doll nudity. Enter at own risk.

.

Soon as tech advances even further, we won't even need women anymore.

Freedom!!!!!

wjf said:

I would rather save my money and not see a therapist. I have a right to hate sex like any rape victim or LGBTQI+ member. If I hated tennis, nobody would say that I need to go to a therapist. I have the right to hate an activity. You might as well tell me to go to a therapist for being LGBTQI+, if I weren't straight. My nature of hating sex is a result of unsolicited sexual content: I would not hate sex so much if it wasn't being thrown in my face every single day. My hate is similar to a lady being sent unsolicited photos of private parts, every single day and regardless of her precautions of avoiding such unsolicited sexuality.

Click to expand...

If you were a rape or sexual abuse victim, that makes sense. I've known many of them, and I suppose I qualify as one, too. Either way, I still suggest you seek help for this. There are health care centers that will accept patients regardless of their ability to pay. I don't know know if you live in the US or what US state you live in so it's hard to give you advice when it comes to that.

Nowhere Man said:

Japanese / Australian love dolls Animated , affectionate, always have the time without the hangups.

~Disclaimer~

Love doll nudity. Enter at own risk.

.

Soon as tech advances even further, we won't even need women anymore.

Freedom!!!!!

Click to expand...

Seems an awful lot of work just to avoid being nagged to put on some pants. But hey, whatever floats your boat.
As soon as you guys are too busy with having sex with your toys, then us women folk can enact our grand plan for world domination. Muhahaha!

@Nowhere Man I've quit watching porn years ago because of its association with the exploitation of women. Pornography and related pursuits are things that I avoid, but I guess some men need them.

I believe that some societies need children and thus foster or inadequately regulate sexual environments for such purposes. I feel that I've seen this through my study of my city's legal system.

Pornography and its related pursuits might seem innocent. But if a greater society is using it as a tool to encourage sex, then the pornography and related pursuits might encourage men to have sex with women. In the instances of human-sized dolls, a man might be ridiculed by fellows or authorities for his doll collection, and would then decide that he should have sex with women rather than dolls.

Not all men would go this route, even because human nature is not so predictable. I feel that there are some men who are content with pornography and related pursuits, and won't ever approach a lady for sex.

However, during my pornography days, I very much wanted to have sex with women. I even asked a lady at work if she wanted to have sex with me, which nowadays is considered propositioning. Other times, I would go online and sext women very explicit and sexually vulgar communications without consent. But after I quit porn, these instances dropped and I stopped communicating with women in an sexually explicit and vulgar manner.

Women would never be obsolete for some societies that require their children. And women will never be obsolete as long as they are human beings that can fight for their human rights. Also, we can not control the gender of a newborn. To say that women would be obsolete, simply because they can not fulfill a sexual role, is an underestimation of women's great impact and contributions to the nonsexual world.

Landon Caeli said:

Sexual inclinations are a kind of weakness. Basically, it's getting "high" on someone.

One with the fullest of control over their emotions would use it wisely.

Click to expand...

No absolutely wrong, sexual inclinations a natural predisposition. Would you call eating a weakness.

One with any control would use it wisely but that is only modern morality getting in the way of life

ChristineM said:

No absolutely wrong, sexual inclinations a natural predisposition. Would you call eating a weakness.

One with any control would use it wisely but that is only modern morality getting in the way of life

Click to expand...

If you don't eat, you die. If you don't have sex, nothing happens.

Landon Caeli said:

If you don't eat, you die. If you don't have sex, nothing happens.

Click to expand...

Emmm. Civilisation dies

wjf said:

But I know there are men who can reach orgasm without women, mankind can learn of ways of securing seeds without orgasm, and lust and sadomasochism are barriers preventing civil and safe reproductive practices.

Click to expand...

Sex is a strong drive. If it were readily available, wouldn't lust be easily satisfied, and cease to be a problem?
Sadomasochism is an entirely different pathology.

We are not bonobos. More sex would likely cause more harm than aid. Sex grows diseases, disrespects homosexuals, allows discrimination, perverts gender, facilitates rape, kills mothers and babies, and enslaves women.

Click to expand...

Lots of things can promote disease: Water pollution, tainted food, promiscuous sex, lack of refrigeration, &c -- as well as any close gathering of people. Should we shut down schools, churches and music concerts?

Basic hygienic measures can greatly reduce the problem, but you seem to see sex as a uniquely hazardous activity that should be curbed entirely, outside of marriage.

How does sex disrespect homosexuals, promote discrimination or enslave women? And what does "perverts gender" even mean?
It seems to me the suppression of and fear of sex is likely to cause these problems, not alleviate them.

We are not Adam and Eve. Adam and Eve were blessed with the presence, voice, and fatherhood of the Almighty. The two existed before the great perversion of the world, and lived in a grand garden, away from societal influences, under the authority of the Almighty. Also, fertility and childbirth labor was a curse given unto Eve because she gave a forbidden fruit to Adam, and may not have been the intended course of mankind. Also, increasing in number and having sex can be two different things. A man can have a lot of sex but never produce a child from it all. And a woman can never have sex, but be pregnant with child like Virgin Mary. Nowadays, a society can be fruitful and increase in number through artificial insemination. You are free to have sex, but I will not have sex because I get treated differently for sex than you do: and that societal discrimination is why I hate sex even more.

Click to expand...

I don't see the relevance here. If you're basing your ideas of propriety on an ancient collection of folklore there is no discussion to be had. Your attitudes are writ in stone.
I don't understand why you'd even bring up social considerations like disease or discrimination if your apologetics isn't based on, and would be unaffected by them.

I would rather save my money and not see a sex therapist. I have a right to hate sex like any rape victim or LGBTQI+ member. If I hated tennis, nobody would say that I need to go to a tennis therapist. I have the right to hate an activity. You might as well tell me to go to a therapist for being LGBTQI+, if I weren't straight. My nature of hating sex is a result of unsolicited sexual content: I would not hate sex so much if it wasn't being thrown in my face every single day. My hate is similar to a lady being sent unsolicited photos of private parts, every single day and regardless of her precautions of avoiding such unsolicited sexuality.

Click to expand...

If you acknowledge these attitudes as personal idiosyncrasies, why do you seem to be defending them or promoting them here? Why should we be persuaded by a personal peculiarity?

I do not find joy in chancing a terminal disease or buying a terminal disease. I do not find joy in having sex with an unconscious woman who drank too much. I do not find joy in having sex with someone who can falsely charge me with rape because of my skin color, race, or gender. I do not find joy in pressuring a lesbian to accept my flirting. I do not find joy in endangering a wife with my consented flirting where her husband might kill her.

Click to expand...

You seem to view sex as a peculiarly hazardous and distasteful activity. I'd advise you to avoid it, then.
I also understand that you've woven a complex tapestry of sexual fears and repercussions to justify this aversion. These strike me more as emotional than reasonable.

I find joy in a lady's freedom to avoid disease or pregnancy complications. I find joy in knowing a woman won't have to touch a man in order to feed herself and her children that resulted from a rape. I find joy in not making women subject to human experiments. Sex is a human experiment: nobody knows the outcome of pregnancy where sometimes a mother might die during childbirth or give birth to a dead baby.

Click to expand...

Makes one wonder why such a hazardous activity was ever invented or tolerated.

Landon Caeli said:

Sexual inclinations are a kind of weakness. Basically, it's getting "high" on someone.

One with the fullest of control over their emotions would use it wisely.

Click to expand...

People like to feel good. We seek activities that we find pleasant, exciting or that generate a dopamine high.
Are all enjoyable activities weaknesses? Should I retire to a cave and live as an ascetic?