• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is this a consequence of Fermat's Last Theorem new?

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
I have not proven by myself the Fermat's Last Theorem, but have taken the Prof. Wiles proof, that a^n+b^n=c^n, n>2, has no solution in positive integers a,b, and c, I have derived several true consequences, as an example:
that expression x^9+y^6=z^3 can not have a solution in positive integers x,y, and z. As an example, it is wrong to write 10^9+13^6=7^3. Can this be accepted at a reputable journal in your opinion?
 

Ouroboros

Coincidentia oppositorum
Well, the theorem is about n>2, which means the exponents can't be 9, 6, and 3. They have to be all the same. The theorem isn't about any polynomial equation. Right?
 

Rational Agnostic

Well-Known Member
I have not proven by myself the Fermat's Last Theorem, but have taken the Prof. Wiles proof, that a^n+b^n=c^n, n>2, has no solution in positive integers a,b, and c, I have derived several true consequences, as an example:
that expression x^9+y^6=z^3 can not have a solution in positive integers x,y, and z. As an example, it is wrong to write 10^9+13^6=7^3. Can this be accepted at a reputable journal in your opinion?

Sorry, but what you "derived" is completely trivial and obvious.
 
Top