• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Socialist Democrats side with terrorist nations. When called out on it...

McBell

Resident Sourpuss

Terese

Mangalam Pundarikakshah
Staff member
Premium Member
I suppose for conservatives Warren believing the death of the general was unjustified would make it seem like she sides with "terrorist nations". Their reasoning skills do need a bit more work though.
 

Notanumber

A Free Man
They are ushered out as in this incident with socialist Democrat Warren during a town hall meeting.

Warren town hall interrupted by angry protester accusing her of ‘siding with terrorists’

The party of Iranian sympathizers strike again.

The Left are just as deluded in the UK.

Qasem Soleimani was evil — so of course Jeremy Corbyn & Co condemn the US

It has been said that the leader of our official opposition party has been paid by Iran.

Corbyn defends £20,000 payment for Iranian TV appearances
 

Laika

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
They are ushered out as in this incident with socialist Democrat Warren during a town hall meeting.

Warren town hall interrupted by angry protester accusing her of ‘siding with terrorists’

The party of Iranian sympathizers strike again.

You really need to take a step back and look at your own history. Its not good for either party, but here are some instances where Ronald Reagan may have funded terrorists, dictators and war criminals.

Operation Cyclone - Wikipedia

United States support for Iraq during the Iran–Iraq War - Wikipedia

Allegations of United States support for the Khmer Rouge - Wikipedia




And here is Ron Paul- a Republican- to explain why such an aggressive and interventions U.S. foreign policy is a “bad idea” (in the context of the Obama administrations involvement with Syria).


And here’s Ron Paul explaining why this approach is bad for Iran back in 2012.

 

pearl

Well-Known Member
I suppose for conservatives Warren believing the death of the general was unjustified would make it seem like she sides with "terrorist nations". Their reasoning skills do need a bit more work though.

Its not so much that it was unjustified but that it was bad strategy.
 

Lyndon

"Peace is the answer" quote: GOD, 2014
Premium Member
So one Iraqi American dead and 230+Iranians dead, most of them innocent civilians, I guess that's what our administration calls a success??
 

Stanyon

WWMRD?
So one Iraqi American dead and 230+Iranians dead, most of them innocent civilians, I guess that's what our administration calls a success??

230? Are you counting some of the ones Iranian civilians stomped to death during their adoration of one of their "dear leaders"?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Last edited:
Top