Trailblazer
Veteran Member
Conversely, how do you know that God does communicate directly to everyone, and it is just a matter of everyone not having ears to hear that communication.Trailblazer said: God not communicating directly to everyone is an observation, something known.
This is an unsupportable assumption, and therefore all the logic that follows based upon it is unworthy of consideration. This is reason #1 why this is illogical.
How do you know God doesn't communicate directly with everyone, and that it really is more a matter of not everyone having ears to hear that communication?
We also have to define what you mean by communication. If you mean an audible voice, that is different from some kind of sign from God.
Are you saying that some people make a conscious choice not to go outside, so they never get communication from God?Think of it like rays of the sun which shines upon everyone equally, but those that never come outside will never feel it. It's there for them, regardless of their problems that deny themselves the sunlight.
No, it is not observable, so that was the wrong choice of words.Again, it is not observable that God doesn't communicate with them.
It “appears” that way to you, but it is not observable that God communicates to anyone, let alone everyone. It does not appear to me that God communicates to anyone except those He chooses to communicate to, the Prophets/Messengers. God might communicate to the minds of some people who are open to hearing, but that is not something that could ever be proven to have come from God and it does not come by way of audible speech.On the contrary, it appears he does, and that only "those with ears to hear and eyes to see," is aware of what's there for everyone equally at all times. It's not God "not communicating". It's us, "not listening". Big difference.
Likewise, we cannot prove that God ever communicated to Messengers, but there is evidence of that in scriptures. Other people only have their personal testimonies that God communicated to them, but they have no evidence to support such a claim. That is the hundred-dollar difference.
I see that as a judgment but I believe only God can judge. For whatever reasons that only God knows, not all people are able to believe in God, let alone discern communication from God.Saying it's God not communicating, takes the responsibility off yourself for not hearing what is being revealed clearly. "It must be God, not me!", is weak, to say the least.
An atheist on my forum wrote it. It is worthy of my consideration since it was posted to me.Trailblazer said: (Note: I did not write this.)
Who did, and why do you consider it worthy of consideration?