Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Not calling witnesses does not preclude President Trump from presenting his own testimony. But a Senate impeachment trial isn’t like a regular criminal trial. President Trump won’t be sitting in a witness box. It would be more like a deposition session with lawyers swapping written questions and responses back and forth.And here i really wanted to see Trump on the witness stand...
No script
No tele-prompter
I would hedge bets as to how long it took him to hang himself.
Don't worry. Moscow Mitch will continue to sit on bipartisan bills passed by the House or promoting more budget busting tax cuts for the rich.There's no point in keeping this political circus show going; the quicker the Senate vindicates Trump, the faster Congress can get back to working on ratifying U.S.M.C.A. or infrastructure improvement projects.
Or she holds them until after the 2020 election, hope the Dems get Senate majority, and if Trump gets a second term, terminate.If Pelosi is smart, she will keep the articles in her pocket and just let it gather dust and have it rot away never to be seen again.
Sadly they may be right this time. The Republicans do not want a fair trial since it is rather obvious that Trump's guilt would become even more obvious.NYPost is a trolling tabloid newspaper. Do you also take Roger Stone's "National Enquirer" seriously? You do realize the NYPost is owned by Murdoch?
This country is in serious trouble
View attachment 35889
I don't know. Do you think that all Republicans are so stupid that they will not recognize a sham trial, which is what their party seems to want? You certainly have a low opinion of Republicans.If Pelosi is smart, she will keep the articles in her pocket and just let it gather dust and have it rot away never to be seen again.
These days, it seems like most rank-and-file Republicans don't care what Trump gets convicted of as long as he keeps locking brown kids in cages and appointing anti-choice and pro-theocracy judges.I don't know. Do you think that all Republicans are so stupid that they will not recognize a sham trial, which is what their party seems to want? You certainly have a low opinion of Republicans.
Not calling witnesses does not preclude President Trump from presenting his own testimony. But a Senate impeachment trial isn’t like a regular criminal trial. President Trump won’t be sitting in a witness box. It would be more like a deposition session with lawyers swapping written questions and responses back and forth.
Trump did not allow those closest to testify. Did you forget the obstruction of justice part of the charges?Don't they have all the testimony they need from the House impeachment hearings? Those who think Trump is guilty already believe they have enough evidence to convict, while those who think Trump is innocent will never be convinced no matter how many witnesses are called.
Trump did not allow those closest to testify. Did you forget the obstruction of justice part of the charges?
Of course there has been more than enough testimony to convict Trump in front of an honest jury. The problem here is that the Republican leader of the Senate himself said that the Republicans would not be honest.
How was the inquiry "unfair"? I think that they may realize that the general public is not as stupid as they wish that they were. Trying to keep them in the dark may be their only hope. Though the public usually recognizes a whitewash job when they see one.I thought they called it "obstruction of congress," not "obstruction of justice."
Still, the Republicans charged that the House inquiry was "unfair," so this may be their way of getting payback.
How was the inquiry "unfair"?
I think that they may realize that the general public is not as stupid as they wish that they were. Trying to keep them in the dark may be their only hope. Though the public usually recognizes a whitewash job when they see one.
I would not mind if the vote went along party lines. What irritates me the most is that Mitch McConnell said that he and the Republicans would violate the oath they have to take as part of the trial.To be honest, I'm not entirely sure, other than the fact that the Democrats have a majority in the House and had the upper hand in the process. The Republicans have been saying how unfair it is throughout the whole thing. Trump wrote that long, scathing letter, and I get the impression that it's part of the general strategy of portraying it as they are.
Yes, although I think they knew this would happen going into it. I'm not sure if it's changed anyone's mind. The vote is going strictly along party lines.
Trump did not allow those closest to testify. Did you forget the obstruction of justice part of the charges?
Of course there has been more than enough testimony to convict Trump in front of an honest jury. The problem here is that the Republican leader of the Senate himself said that the Republicans would not be honest.
No one thinks he's innocent. Not even the senate republicans. They just don't care about the rule of law when it comes to keeping "their guy" in power.Don't they have all the testimony they need from the House impeachment hearings? Those who think Trump is guilty already believe they have enough evidence to convict, while those who think Trump is innocent will never be convinced no matter how many witnesses are called.
Don't worry. Moscow Mitch will continue to sit on bipartisan bills passed by the House or promoting more budget busting tax cuts for the rich.