Milton Platt
Well-Known Member
On the basic level, the diagrams themselves are such evidence (though I do not expect you to accept that, for those that say that they are 'atheist' these days are really antitheists (aka Dawkins, Hitchens, etc), but there are few and rare exceptions of the intelligent atheist, who is more agnostic, or without information after a certain manner, though they do have it before them already as Romans 1 states). What do I mean? The diagrams are a set of ordered and structured letters, numbers, syntax, demonstrating intelligence conveying information behind their creation. This in itself demonstrates creation, and thus creator. Now from the least to the greater, follow the same chain of mathematics, syntax, language back to the original. DNA, RNA, etc is also such diagram. Ordered information, in syntax, with mathematics etc. It truly is a language to convey information and to be expressed from genotype to phenotype. What takes a host of humans with super computers and hours, days and sometimes years to read from the DNA "code" (who was the 'coder?'), and yet cells are able to interpret/read it infinitely faster.
"The Universal Genetic Code is the instruction manual that all cells use to read the DNA sequence of a gene and build a corresponding protein." (source linked below)
The words are screaming at you dear Milton Platt - "Programmer".
Anyone who does coding, such as I have, in numerous 'languages' (FORTRAN, DOS, QBASIC, C, C++, VISUAL, etc) knows that "code" doesn't spontaneously arise. One might point to AI 'coding', but this still points to the programmer of the AI, which then codes after.
Even those that do gene sequencing and study genetics, etc relay it as such:
"... We can think about the protein-coding sequence of a gene as a sentence made up entirely of 3-letter words. In the sequence, each 3-letter word is a codon, specifying a single amino acid in a protein. Have a look at this sentence:
Thesunwashotbuttheoldmandidnotgethishat.
If you were to split this sentence into individual 3-letter words, you would probably read it like this:
The sun was hot but the old man did not get his hat.
This sentence represents a gene. Each letter corresponds to a nucleotide base, and each word represents a codon. What if you shifted the "reading frame?" You would end up with:
T hes unw ash otb utt heo ldm and idn otg eth ish at.
Or Th esu nwa sho tbu tth eol dma ndi dno tge thi sha t.
As you can see, only one of these reading frames translates into an understandable sentence. In the same way, only one reading frame within a gene codes for the correct protein. ..." - How do Cells Read Genes?
So when you say, before we look at them (diagrams), this is already a willing blindness on your part. I do not say this to be cruel, but say this because you just told me "before we look"., which means you presently don't want to see. This must be dealt with first precious Milton.
Still discussing the diagrams, there is further evidence within, in the information they convey. What I mean is Prophecy and the fulfillment thereof:
Isa 46:9 Remember the former things of old: for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me,
Isa 46:10 Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:
In fact, as one of the diagrams show, God, in Genesis 1, foretold the entire history of the world in a miniature seed.
The true God said that He was God, and gave the test (prophecy) to prove, if creation (all around you 24/7/365, which is why no one really needs 'evidence', people just need help removing their hands from their own eyes by love and not force) wasn't enough.
Hopefully, this brief answer will give all something to think about.
No, I do not accept that. How do you know it wasn't faeries? Or unicorns?