• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Talofa!

Milton Platt

Well-Known Member
On the basic level, the diagrams themselves are such evidence (though I do not expect you to accept that, for those that say that they are 'atheist' these days are really antitheists (aka Dawkins, Hitchens, etc), but there are few and rare exceptions of the intelligent atheist, who is more agnostic, or without information after a certain manner, though they do have it before them already as Romans 1 states). What do I mean? The diagrams are a set of ordered and structured letters, numbers, syntax, demonstrating intelligence conveying information behind their creation. This in itself demonstrates creation, and thus creator. Now from the least to the greater, follow the same chain of mathematics, syntax, language back to the original. DNA, RNA, etc is also such diagram. Ordered information, in syntax, with mathematics etc. It truly is a language to convey information and to be expressed from genotype to phenotype. What takes a host of humans with super computers and hours, days and sometimes years to read from the DNA "code" (who was the 'coder?'), and yet cells are able to interpret/read it infinitely faster.

"The Universal Genetic Code is the instruction manual that all cells use to read the DNA sequence of a gene and build a corresponding protein." (source linked below)

The words are screaming at you dear Milton Platt - "Programmer".

Anyone who does coding, such as I have, in numerous 'languages' (FORTRAN, DOS, QBASIC, C, C++, VISUAL, etc) knows that "code" doesn't spontaneously arise. One might point to AI 'coding', but this still points to the programmer of the AI, which then codes after.


Even those that do gene sequencing and study genetics, etc relay it as such:

"... We can think about the protein-coding sequence of a gene as a sentence made up entirely of 3-letter words. In the sequence, each 3-letter word is a codon, specifying a single amino acid in a protein. Have a look at this sentence:

Thesunwashotbuttheoldmandidnotgethishat.

If you were to split this sentence into individual 3-letter words, you would probably read it like this:

The sun was hot but the old man did not get his hat.

This sentence represents a gene. Each letter corresponds to a nucleotide base, and each word represents a codon. What if you shifted the "reading frame?" You would end up with:

T hes unw ash otb utt heo ldm and idn otg eth ish at.

Or Th esu nwa sho tbu tth eol dma ndi dno tge thi sha t.

As you can see, only one of these reading frames translates into an understandable sentence. In the same way, only one reading frame within a gene codes for the correct protein. ..." - How do Cells Read Genes?

So when you say, before we look at them (diagrams), this is already a willing blindness on your part. I do not say this to be cruel, but say this because you just told me "before we look"., which means you presently don't want to see. This must be dealt with first precious Milton.

Still discussing the diagrams, there is further evidence within, in the information they convey. What I mean is Prophecy and the fulfillment thereof:

Isa 46:9 Remember the former things of old: for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me,
Isa 46:10 Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:

In fact, as one of the diagrams show, God, in Genesis 1, foretold the entire history of the world in a miniature seed.

The true God said that He was God, and gave the test (prophecy) to prove, if creation (all around you 24/7/365, which is why no one really needs 'evidence', people just need help removing their hands from their own eyes by love and not force) wasn't enough.

Hopefully, this brief answer will give all something to think about.

No, I do not accept that. How do you know it wasn't faeries? Or unicorns?
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Talofa!

I am specifically Seventh-day Adventist (not born or raised as)

01. Christian,
02. Protestant (anti-Catholicism, not anti-Catholic),
03. Creationist (Young Earth, 6,244 years ish) (non-evolutionist, non-theistic evolutionist. non gap-ist),
04. Noahic Global Catastrophist (circa AM 1656; or 600th year of Noah's life), Month (2nd), Day (17th) Gen 07:6,11; lasting a year (AM 1657 2nd, 27th (Gen 8:14-16))),
05. JEHOVIST (LORD God is JEHOVAH Elohiym),
06. Trio-ist (Father, Son and Holy Ghost, each Divine/Deity, are three eternal distinct Beings/Persons working together as one chord; with Father and Son having body, parts, form, shape, likeness (nature of the Holy Ghost/Spirit is a mystery unexplained though He is an eternal Person/Being), not necessarily 'trinitarian' (depends on definition (anti-Roman Catholicism def.))
07. King James Bible as the perfectly inspired and preserved word of God in English,
08. Annihilationist (wicked will be ultimately destroyed and gone forever after 3rd Advent),
09. Soul Sleepist (conditional mortalist; anti-psychopannychiast),
10. Ten Commandments (God's Law for all mankind in all times)
11. Sabbath of the LORD - keeper (the 7th day of the scriptural week as formulated at creation/Genesis) etc)
12. Historicist (prophetic, non-futurist, non-preterist, non-amillenialist, non-allegoricist)
13. Millenialist (aka chiliast) (literal, natural 1,000 years to come (spent in Heaven, not on earth))
14. Assurance of Salvation (relationship) but not OSAS, not Irresistible Grace (iow, can lose, cast away salvation)
15. Unfallen (no sin) Life on Unfallen Worlds believer (not little green, grey, etc men or beast men)
16. Continuing Gifts in the Church (such as gift of Prophecy, through persons like (but not limited to) sister Ellen G White), in other words, a non-'cessastionist'.
17. Health Reformer (Edenist)
18. Resurrectionist (belief in the resurrection, not merely of Jesus (and others past), but also of the 3 resurrections to come; special (mixture), first great (just/righteous) and second great (unjust/damnation)
19. Adventist (waiting for the real and soon return of Jesus Christ in glory and power from Heaven)
20. Tabernaclist (all doctrine may be found in God's Temple/Tabernacle/Sanctuary)
21. Conspiratorialist (I believe the scriptures (KJB) point out the secret doings of men in high places)
22. Globist (the world/earth is a spheroid, not flat, nor domish)
23. Love for the Truth/Facts (no matter the field of study/topic/subject)
24. Blood Atonement (Jesus' blood is the purchase of the whole world)

I hope that helps in any future conversation with me. Any questions, please ask, and do not assume, whether in public or private.

AWHN-2300-Day-Years-Prophecy-of-Daniel-8-Vs-14-And-Its-Sub-Parts.jpg

Source

AWHN-Bible-7000-Years.jpg

Source

AWHN-Bible-7-Feasts-Of-The-LORD.jpg

Source

AWHN-Bible-Psalms-77-Vs-13-Thy-Way-O-God-Is-In-The-Sanctuary.jpg

Source
Thats quite a list there. You will fit right in with us rabblers.
 

Crosstian

Baring the Cross
No, I do not accept that. How do you know it wasn't faeries? Or unicorns?
You believe a "unicorn", a rhinoceros, a created lesser intelligent creature, created everything?

AWHN-KJB-Unicorn-Rhinoceros-Isaiah-34-vs-7.jpg

Source


You believe faeries, another name for devils, fallen angels (beautiful beings masquerading themselves to that which pleases the carnal mind), whom themselves are created higher intelligences, now corrupted, created everything?

You are positing created beings are the Creator?
 
Last edited:

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
You believe a "unicorn", a rhinoceros, a created lesser intelligent creature, created everything?
You are positing created beings are the Creator?
At least we can say that rhinoceros exists. We cannot say that about God, unicorns and fairies.
Yeah, many people are of the opinion that humans created God. RigVeda agrees to that.

"ko addhā veda ka iha pravocat kuta ājātā kuta iyamvisrishtih l
arvāg devā asya visarjanenāthā ko veda yatābabhūva ll"

Who verily knows and who can here declare it, whence it was born and whence comes this creation?
The Gods are later than this world's production. Who knows then whence it first came into being?
Rig Veda: Rig-Veda, Book 10: HYMN CXXIX. Creation., Verse 6
 

Milton Platt

Well-Known Member
You believe a "unicorn", a rhinoceros, a created lesser intelligent creature, created everything?

AWHN-KJB-Unicorn-Rhinoceros-Isaiah-34-vs-7.jpg

Source


You believe faeries, another name for devils, fallen angels (beautiful beings masquerading themselves to that which pleases the carnal mind), whom themselves are created higher intelligences, now corrupted, created everything?

You are positing created beings are the Creator?

No, I do not believe in supernatural or made-up things. A rhinoceros is not another name for unicorns, which are a mythological horse with wings.........Devils and faeries are both mythological creatures which vary greatly in description depending upon the time frame and the culture of the person doing the describing.

What does what I believe have to do with answering the question I posed? I was interrogating your beliefs.
 

dybmh

דניאל יוסף בן מאיר הירש
@Crosstian ,

I am honestly not trying to be rude; but, may I respectfully request that the videos in this thread need to be summarized somehow.

How much time do you expect any of us to spend watching these videos in order to have a conversation with you on any of your chosen topics? In one post alone in another thread, there was over 4 hours of video that was needed in order to participate.

That doesn't make sense. OK?

Other's have requested the same, and I think it's fair request.

Videos are probably better than large quoted sections of scripture... but not by much. Neither are convincing. However, as evidenced in another thread, you have a lot of knowledge to share. And when it's presented in your own words, I think it's 100 times better than any of these videos. Mostly because, I'm much more likely to read your words than watch 2+ hours of video.
 
Last edited:

Milton Platt

Well-Known Member
You'll have to define "supernatural".

What about archaeology? Do you believe in it?


That which is defies the laws of the universe as we know them. Anything which is considered to be "outside" the natural world, such as ghosts, goblins, faeries, gods, etc.

Yes, I believe a branch of science called archaeology exists. What I think you meant to ask is do I believe that branch of science is a valid form of understanding the past. Yes, I do. Is everything every archaeologist says valid? No.
 
Top