Frank Goad
Well-Known Member
As a jw.How much should I trust science?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
As the JW website says:
"We respect the achievements of science and believe in scientific findings that are supported by evidence."
source
So I imagine you should trust it just as much as non-JWs do.
.
.
If they were honest that quote would read,As the JW website says:
"We respect the achievements of science and believe in scientific findings that are supported by evidence."
source
So I imagine you should trust it just as much as non-JWs do.
.
.
You know something I don't? Please share. (I'm not that familiar with the JWs.)If they were honest that quote would read,
“We respect the achievements of science and believe in scientific findings that are supported by our leaders interpretation of the Bible”
I’m a little confused. You’ve posted that you now consider yourself to be a member of the Jehovah Witnesses, but you keep posting questions that indicate that you really do not know or understand much about that group.As a jw.How much should I trust science?
Yet so many fields of science are disbelieved despite facts. The facts are just denied.As the JW website says:
"We respect the achievements of science and believe in scientific findings that are supported by evidence."
source
So I imagine you should trust it just as much as non-JWs do.
I’m a little confused. You’ve posted that you now consider yourself to be a member of the Jehovah Witnesses, but you keep posting questions that indicate that you really do not know or understand much about that group.
I’m not trying to dissuade you from membership in that group if that is where you believe you should be, but don’t you think you should have a firmer grasp of the teachings before you make the commitment?
As a jw.How much should I trust science?
Shouldn't you already know JW before you had join them?How would I go about knowing all I should know About the jw religion?Any tips?
As a jw.How much should I trust science?
Yet so many fields of science are disbelieved despite facts. The facts are just denied.
Science is often seen as some sort of massive conspiracy.
Oh my, not understanding evidence is the only thing that keeps this from being a lie. There are facts confirming abiogenesis, just not enough to fully explain the concept. There are no facts confirming creation by a magical deity. There are countless facts confirming the theory of evolution. So many that it is considered to be both a fact and a theory, just like gravity.There are no facts that prove the theory of evolution. No facts confirming how life originated. You can't deny what does not exist. You have assertions and assumptions...these are not facts.
You know the funny thing about conspiracy theories is that many of them are actually true....they are just hidden among the more ridiculous things so you'll lump them all in together.....how would you know?
.
Huh? Who are you asking?As a jw.How much should I trust science?
I’m not trying to dissuade you from membership in that group if that is where you believe you should be, but don’t you think you should have a firmer grasp of the teachings before you make the commitment?
This is why I'm skeptical. The ToE is one of the best supported theories in science, yet JW "respecters of scientific fact" dismiss them. Now it's true there are no facts that prove the ToE, but there are no facts to prove the germ theory or heliocentrism, either. As you've been told here a dozen times, science never 'proves' anything, it just amasses facts. The ToE is based on facts.There are no facts that prove the theory of evolution. No facts confirming how life originated. You can't deny what does not exist. You have assertions and assumptions...these are not facts.
.......interpreted to fit a materialist pov.The ToE is based on facts.
The facts are what they are. There's no way to "interpret" them to support a magical third party pulling the strings........interpreted to fit a materialist pov.
This is why I'm skeptical. The ToE is one of the best supported theories in science, yet JW "respecters of scientific fact" dismiss them. Now it's true there are no facts that prove the ToE, but there are no facts to prove the germ theory or heliocentrism, either. As you've been told here a dozen times, science never 'proves' anything, it just amasses facts. The ToE is based on facts.
.