-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Evolution My ToE
- Thread starter nPeace
- Start date
dad
Undefeated
Rather than an honest answer (i.e. no) you toss up smoke and mirrors of liquor.
To be clear then, let's have you admit that you deny the existence of God and all spirit beings good or bad.
dad
Undefeated
Apparently you are not familiar with bible prophesy. John was taken to the future and wrote what he saw and heard.
dad
Undefeated
Easy question. At creation, there was water on earth and also water above space. (where God put the stars) The windows (in science terms perhaps something like a wormhole that crosses space and time) of heaven were opened and allowed the waters on the far side of the stars to be transported to earth most likely. Added to this was the founts of the deep on earth opened suddenly, allowing waters that used to be under the earth to come up.
As for your comprehension of time itself and what it may be, do not blame your inability to understand on others. Just admit science doesn't know what time is like in deep space.
dad
Undefeated
I asked a question. If anyone claims DNA was the same, and therefore could be used to tell us about where man came from, they would need to show that God created us with the same nature (therefore DNA) as we see today. More a science issue than 'fundy' issue.
ecco
Veteran Member
Please try to understand the question before posting a nonsense reply.
The only reason you believe that it is different is that you want to believe it is different. That's hardly a good reason. Your desires do not affect nature.
dad
Undefeated
Great, so when we see spirtits as rulers or influencing ancient history you dismiss it because you believe there is no such thing. That is denial. Furthermore denial based on ignorance alone.
dad
Undefeated
Don't throw a tantrum because some folks will not include the dark, belief based origin fables as part of what science really is. You made it clear you have no ability or wish to differentiate.
dad
Undefeated
It matters not what anyone believes in regards to what the past nature on earth was like. Either you know and can prove it or not..and you just believe...like science does.
Bear Wild
Well-Known Member
Amazing you do not understand the world you live in. Horseshoe crabs have been around on this earth longer than humans. Now you are saying the horseshoe crabs of the past were different just because we can't time travel into the past? Did they have tea parties back then when the world operated on an entirely different sent of natural rules. Oh I get it, its like Alice in wonderland. What magic mushrooms have you been eating?
dad
Undefeated
Possibly, if they were a created kind, but we don't know that to be the case. Man WAS here days after the sea creatures was created, so if the crabs underwent evolving at all, it is likely that horseshoe crabs actually came after man. We'd have to look at the deposits that the earliest horseshoe crabs were found in. Ha.
No, how would I know what original kinds they came from or were? You can't just make stuff up here as if you know something.
Spirits lived with me, trees grew in weeks, and man lived about 1000 years. That qualifies as different to me.
dad
Undefeated
Since many in the medical field are drug addicted and possessed anyhow, what they call spirits that they have no clue about doesn't much matter! The mental health fields simple declare any potential spiritual effects or influences to be something else out of ignorance. I would no more ask some drug pushing psychiatrist if spirits lived than I would ask a crow how to fix a car.
nPeace
Veteran Member
Okay. Continuing...Of course it's not unfair for you to ask to be able to "plot your course". So please proceed and present your scenario.
So because an error occurs during replication, that does not mean it will automatically be a mutation.
However, it can be a mutation - one that has been repaired though not perfectly.
If this is the case, sometimes the mutated gene can still function, and be recognized by communicating genes, as the gene that carries out X function. Or... to be continued...
So far, is there anything you disagree with, or don't understand?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
A mutation is a sort of "error". A mutation is any change in the DNA that is passed on.
LOL, and seriously, you should not ask others if they "understand" when you post rather obvious errors.
A mutated gene may still function. It may function better, or worse, or in many cases not at all. All of those changes are by definition mutations.
dad
Undefeated
That is fine to believe that. It is another thing to use it in theories such as TOE.