Disney+ content warning: Disney Plus streaming service puts warnings for "outdated cultural depictions" in some of its classic movies - CBS News
The Song of the South was completely absent from the channel's selection.
Some have argued that the content warnings are not enough: https://www.washingtonpost.com/arts...ions-some-films-thats-not-enough-experts-say/
I guess the question might be asked: Should these movies even be shown at all? Or more specifically, should people even want to watch them? I can't imagine myself watching them, even for nostalgic reasons.
On the other hand, the Disney name itself is being called into question. If he was a racist, an anti-Semite, and misogynist, then should the company live on and immortalize his name? Should they change the name of "Disneyland" to something else?
I'm not sure either way. Some of my fondest childhood memories were when we visited Disneyland, and at the time, I thought Walt Disney was a great man. They didn't mention his unsavory side in "The Walt Disney Story."
A select number of films, which include "Dumbo," "Lady and the Tramp," "The Aristocats" and more, have the warning. Many social media users shared the alert that read: "This program is presented as originally created. It may contain outdated cultural depictions."
Some of the movies — many of which were originally released in the 1940s and 1950s — contain scenes that would now be considered racist, offensive or inaccurate. For example, in "Dumbo," there are crows that perpetuate racist stereotypes of African Americans. One of the crows is named "Jim Crow."
The Song of the South was completely absent from the channel's selection.
Some have argued that the content warnings are not enough: https://www.washingtonpost.com/arts...ions-some-films-thats-not-enough-experts-say/
Disney’s much-anticipated streaming service has tacked warnings onto the beginnings of some movies indicating that they might include racist or otherwise offensive elements — a move that experts say begins to address the problem but fails to go far enough.
A message that airs before classic films including “Dumbo” and “Peter Pan” on Disney Plus says the movie is shown as it originally was made and “may contain outdated cultural depictions.”
The decision to attach this message to some animated films was met with both praise from people who viewed it as an accountability measure and criticism from those who thought its wording was dismissive. The mixed response, experts say, highlights the fact that Disney only has begun to take responsibility for the problematic representations.
“It really feels like a first step,” said Michael Baran, a senior partner at the Illinois-based diversity and inclusion consulting firm InQUEST Consulting. “I think that they could be so much more forceful in not only what they are saying, in the warning, but also in what they’re doing.”
Walt Disney, who co-founded the Walt Disney Co. with his brother Roy O. Disney, has been called racist and misogynistic, although his biographer and other supporters have disputed that representation. Walt Disney’s grandniece, the filmmaker Abigail Disney, said in 2014 that she agreed with the negative assessment of her great uncle.
The Disney Plus launch ratchets up talk of streaming competition. But the same creators work for all of them.
“Anti-Semite? Check. Misogynist? OF COURSE!! Racist? C’mon he made a film (‘Jungle Book’) about how you should stay ‘with your own kind’ at the height of the fight over segregation!” Abigail Disney wrote on Facebook. “As if the ‘King of the Jungle’ number wasn’t proof enough!! How much more information do you need?”
The allegations that Walt Disney was racist may make executives at the company he founded feel especially responsible for addressing the unsavory aspects of its movies, said Gayle Wald, who chairs the American studies department at George Washington University and specializes in race and popular media. She said that the phrasing Disney chose is vague and that the company should be more explicit about its intended message.
I guess the question might be asked: Should these movies even be shown at all? Or more specifically, should people even want to watch them? I can't imagine myself watching them, even for nostalgic reasons.
On the other hand, the Disney name itself is being called into question. If he was a racist, an anti-Semite, and misogynist, then should the company live on and immortalize his name? Should they change the name of "Disneyland" to something else?
I'm not sure either way. Some of my fondest childhood memories were when we visited Disneyland, and at the time, I thought Walt Disney was a great man. They didn't mention his unsavory side in "The Walt Disney Story."