New Paradox of Special Relativity

Albert Einstein said against Quantum Physics: "God does not play dice''. Einstein has never accepted the Quantum Physics. So, there can be a contradiction between the Theory of Relativity and Quantum Physics. That means, that one or more of these two theories are incomplete. Just like the Gödel incompleteness theorem says, that formal arithmetic is incomplete.

Disproof of Special Relativity found no better place than non-moderated viXra - the alternative archive of pre-prints:

Solution to the New Paradox of Special Relativity, viXra.org e-Print archive, viXra:1911.0239

Reason of rejection from the official archive preprints.org
- the world has sinned by murdering Godman, and does not like to find the truth; for Truth is God.

Science is falsifiable, tells well accepted Popper's criterion of Science. So, it is not surprising then, that Science can be false. I know, that I know nothing, says the Greek philosopher.

Science is defined as the quest for knowledge. The journals of Scientific Community are not only a way to grants, Nobel prize, and glory, but rather the enterprise for making the Truth from incoming information. However, the human factor rejects both effectively the revolutionary true papers, and absurd ones: the genius often looks like crazy one; recall the photo with the tongue of Albert Einstein and rejection of the million USD by Dr. Grigori Perelman. Somebody smart-looking filmed a complaint: ``Nature is a pseudo elitist joke'' YouTube. That is why the following text found no place in serious journals, so the reader could decide for himself is author a genius like TV Doctor Who or a ``crazy scientist'' like Nicola Tesla. Why am I in light, but many people are in delusion? I just follow the guiding star: ``Guiding Star - Original Song'' YouTube.

questfortruth said:

Albert Einstein said against Quantum Physics: "God does not play dice''. Einstein has never accepted the Quantum Physics. So, there can be a contradiction between the Theory of Relativity and Quantum Physics. That means, that one or more of these two theories are incomplete. Just like the Gödel incompleteness theorem says, that formal arithmetic is incomplete.

Disproof of Special Relativity found no better place than non-moderated viXra - the alternative archive of pre-prints:

Solution to the New Paradox of Special Relativity, viXra.org e-Print archive, viXra:1911.0239

Reason of rejection from the official archive preprints.org
the world is evil, does not like to find the truth.

Click to expand...

Vixra is a notorious dustbin of junk science papers, that stand no chance of being accepted by reputable journals.

Anything you read there is almost certain to be rubbish.

Anti-relativity cranks are two-a-penny on the internet. I must have come across dozens. None of them makes any sense whatsoever and none can address the issue that relativity is borne out by observation and has never been faulted. (The same is true of quantum mechanics.)

exchemist said:

Vixra is a notorious dustbin of junk science papers, that stand no chance of being accepted by reputable journals.

Anything you read there is almost certain to be rubbish.

Anti-relativity cranks are two-a-penny on the internet. I must have come across dozens. None of them makes any sense whatsoever and none can address the issue that relativity is borne out by observation and has never been faulted. (The same is true of quantum mechanics.)

Click to expand...

I am not everybody. I have dedicated to Professional Top Science all my life.

questfortruth said:

I am not everybody. I have dedicated to Professional Top Science all my life.

Click to expand...

The hell you have. You don't know the first thing about any science. That is obvious to any reader with school level science education. And it does not address my point, which is that the link you provided is to a useless piece of junk.

Unless of course you are the author of it, in which case you are spamming the forum and I shall report you for it.

exchemist said:

Vixra is a notorious dustbin of junk science papers, that stand no chance of being accepted by reputable journals.

Anything you read there is almost certain to be rubbish.

Click to expand...

Reason of rejection from the official archive preprints.org
- the world has sinned by murdering Godman, and does not like to find the truth; for Truth is God.

Science is falsifiable, tells well accepted Popper's criterion of Science. So, it is not surprising then, that Science can be false. I know, that I know nothing, says the Greek philosopher.

Science is defined as the quest for knowledge. The journals of Scientific Community are not only a way to grants, Nobel prize, and glory, but rather the enterprise for making the Truth from incoming information. However, the human factor rejects both effectively the revolutionary true papers, and absurd ones: the genius often looks like crazy one; recall the photo with the tongue of Albert Einstein and rejection of the million USD by Dr. Grigori Perelman. Somebody smart-looking filmed a complaint: ``Nature is a pseudo elitist joke'' YouTube. That is why the following text found no place in serious journals, so the reader could decide for himself is author a genius like TV Doctor Who or a ``crazy scientist'' like Nicola Tesla. Why am I in light, but many people are in delusion? I just follow the guiding star: ``Guiding Star - Original Song'' YouTube.

exchemist said:

I shall report you for it.

Click to expand...

Shoot me into the chest! Somebody else will come into my place!

questfortruth said:

Reason of rejection from the official archive preprints.org
- the world has sinned by murdering Godman, and does not like to find the truth; for Truth is God.

Science is falsifiable, tells well accepted Popper's criterion of Science. So, it is not surprising then, that Science can be false. I know, that I know nothing, says the Greek philosopher.

Science is defined as the quest for knowledge. The journals of Scientific Community are not only a way to grants, Nobel prize, and glory, but rather the enterprise for making the Truth from incoming information. However, the human factor rejects both effectively the revolutionary true papers, and absurd ones: the genius often looks like crazy one; recall the photo with the tongue of Albert Einstein and rejection of the million USD by Dr. Grigori Perelman. Somebody smart-looking filmed a complaint: ``Nature is a pseudo elitist joke'' YouTube. That is why the following text found no place in serious journals, so the reader could decide for himself is author a genius like TV Doctor Who or a ``crazy scientist'' like Nicola Tesla. Why am I in light, but many people are in delusion? I just follow the guiding star: ``Guiding Star - Original Song'' YouTube.

Click to expand...

I agree the reader will decide for himself. But he is not going to waste his time reading papers from vixra to do that. He will see the paper comes from vixra and - quite rightly - instantly dismiss it. Much quicker, you see .

Neither Einstein nor Perelman (who is a mathematician, not a scientist) had to resort to publishing papers in junk journals. Both were immediately accepted as being important and serious contributors to their fields. So making comparisons with them is irrelevant.

You seem to be trying the "Galileo Gambit", i.e. "They laughed at Galileo, ergo I am a genius." It think it was Carl Sagan who said, "They may have laughed at Galileo. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown."

questfortruth said:

Shoot me into the chest! Somebody else will come into my place!

Click to expand...

Are you Dmitri Martila, then?

exchemist said:

I agree the reader will decide for himself. But he is not going to waste his time reading papers from vixra to do that. He will see the paper comes from vixra and - quite rightly - instantly dismiss it. Much quicker, you see .

Click to expand...

I can do it even faster: the post is from questfortruth.

questfortruth said:

Disproof of Special Relativity found no better place than non-moderated viXra - the alternative archive of pre-prints:

Solution to the New Paradox of Special Relativity, viXra.org e-Print archive, viXra:1911.0239

Click to expand...

Not surprised it was rejected, for starters it's a total mess. You haven't been clear what frame of reference you're using for your calculations nor about what the actual situation is. Your calculation makes no sense at all.

exchemist said:

Are you Dmitri Martila, then?

Click to expand...

Yes he is. There is no doubt about that anymore

exchemist said:

Are you Dmitri Martila, then?

Click to expand...

The name has popped up several times attached to @questfortruth threads. So it is fairly safe to assume that @questfortruth and Dmitri Martila are one and the same

questfortruth said:

I am not everybody. I have dedicated to Professional Top Science all my life.

Click to expand...

<ignore-list>


</ignore-list>

This file http://vixra.org/pdf/1911.0239v1.pdf By Dmitri Martila look very similar to the OP, or am i wrong?

@questfortruth I think I see where the paper diverges from Einsteins ideas. If you assume high velocity, then when the ship passed that asteroid, you cannot use the standard length of the ship and asteroid, because it is like there is a compression or expansion of space. As velocity comes closer to c, v/c gets ever closer to 1, which makes your travel time relative to earth equal to zero. That is impossible of course. You cannot have zero travel time, and you cannot have v equal to c according to the man Einstein. As your velocity begins to rival the velocity of light, space expands or contracts or your density changes. Therefore you can no longer compare the ship length against the asteroid.

Brickjectivity said:

when the ship passed that asteroid, you cannot use the standard length of the ship and asteroid, because it is like there is a compression or expansion of space.

Click to expand...

The asteroid size is not a factor. The asteroid can be replaced by a dust particle or an electron, which floats in space. Being inside the spaceship, the astronaut does not notice the Lorentz contraction of the spaceship cabin. But the asteroid being like a mathematical point, moves along the wall of cabin with the velocity v, because the spaceship flies at this velocity, but the asteroid has zero velocity. So, looking out the window, one sees asteroid flies at the speed v.

questfortruth said:

The asteroid size is not a factor. The asteroid can be replaced by a dust particle or an electron, which floats in space. Being inside the spaceship, the astronaut does not notice the Lorentz contraction of the spaceship cabin. But the asteroid being like a mathematical point, moves along the wall of cabin with the velocity v, because the spaceship flies at this velocity, but the asteroid has zero velocity. So, looking out the window, one sees asteroid flies at the speed v.

Click to expand...

The asteroid is in a different frame of reference according to the man Einstein. You are assuming it is in the same frame of reference by comparing the velocities, so you are not agreeing with Einstein. Therefore Einstein is not agreeing with you. If you compare the velocities you can get a velocity greater than the speed of light, because you can say the asteroid is going in the opposite direction. Einstein believes space will contract or that density will change to prevent that or that time will compress or expand. He says that space and time can flex, so the velocities are not absolute. Even if the asteroid is considered to be a point, the space no longer works under the same measurement scheme.

Brickjectivity said:

The asteroid is in a different frame of reference according to the man Einstein. You are assuming it is in the same frame of reference by comparing the velocities, so you are not agreeing with Einstein. Therefore Einstein is not agreeing with you. If you compare the velocities you can get a velocity greater than the speed of light, because you can say the asteroid is going in the opposite direction. Einstein believes space will contract or that density will change to prevent that or that time will compress or expand. He says that space and time can flex, so the velocities are not absolute. Even if the asteroid is considered to be a point, the space no longer works under the same measurement scheme.

Click to expand...

Yes, we have two coordinates: co-moving with the ship ones and the coordinates connected with Earth. In latter, the ship flies with v, and the asteroid has zero velocity. The Lorentz transformation can show, that in the ship co-moving coordinates, the velocity of the ship is zero, but the asteroid has exact v.

questfortruth said:

Yes, we have two coordinates: co-moving with the ship ones and the coordinates connected with Earth. In latter, the ship flies with v, and the asteroid has zero velocity. The Lorentz transformation can show, that in the ship co-moving coordinates, the velocity of the ship is zero, but the asteroid has exact v.

Click to expand...

I will try to explain, and I will also point out why I think that Relativity is compatible with Christ.

According to Einstein, space seems to stretch as the ship accelerates so you cannot make such a measurement. It is unclear to me whether space stretches, or density increases or time lengthens, but Physicists seem to believe that space or time change preventing the conditions you have predicted. Things that seem like constants are not constants when you accelerate.

Einstein is not the enemy of truth or of churches. He believes in God. The philosophical difference between you and him is small, perhaps smaller than you imagine. According to his discovery of Relativity, time is like a painting with each person living in its time, never ceasing to exist. You live now, Abraham lives thousands of years ago, and some people live in the future. All can pray for one another, all being part of time. All are alive in their own time, never disappearing. This is the implication of Relativity. It is compatible with Christ I think, because to live is Christ and to die is gain. All are one in Christ. To follow Christ means denying ourselves, and I think this fits well with Relativity.

Brickjectivity said:

I will try to explain, and I will also point out why I think that Relativity is compatible with Christ.

According to Einstein, space seems to stretch as the ship accelerates so you cannot make such a measurement. It is unclear to me whether space stretches, or density increases or time lengthens, but Physicists seem to believe that space or time change preventing the conditions you have predicted. Things that seem like constants are not constants when you accelerate.

Einstein is not the enemy of truth or of churches. He believes in God. The philosophical difference between you and him is small, perhaps smaller than you imagine. According to his discovery of Relativity, time is like a painting with each person living in its time, never ceasing to exist. You live now, Abraham lives thousands of years ago, and some people live in the future. All can pray for one another, all being part of time. All are alive in their own time, never disappearing. This is the implication of Relativity. It is compatible with Christ I think, because to live is Christ and to die is gain. All are one in Christ. To follow Christ means denying ourselves, and I think this fits well with Relativity.

Click to expand...

Yes, I like Einstein too. Time after time I like re-watching films about him. I have found the solution to my paradox: Virtual Terms, which are in the above file.

Imagine spaceship, which proper length, which astronaut measures is 1000 meters.
The super-powerful engine, which uses Dak Matter like substance - Virtual Matter, accelerates the ship at almost speed of light: 99.999 percent of it. According to Earth observation, the meeting of the ship with Pluto lasts 0.001 seconds, so after passing it, the ship has no contact with Pluto even in his own co-moving coordinate system. How that is possible, I mean to loose contact with Pluto, if the speed of the ship is almost c, so the size of the solar system is just 10 meters, compare it to 1000 meters of size of the ship?