• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Disproof of all Science

ChristineM

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
questfortruth said:
Do you like the following first page? Can you read it, or it is in Chinese?

\title{They look for matter in Dark Matter, because Non-material Dark Matter can falsify falsifiable Physics and Math}

\author{Dmitri Martila}
\affiliation{Institute of Physics, Tartu University}
\email{[email protected]}

\date{8.Nov.2019}

\begin{abstract}
Science is falsifiable, tells well accepted Popper's criterion of Science. So, it is not surprising then, that Science can be false. I know, that I know nothing, says the Greek philosopher. Science is defined as the quest for knowledge. The journals of Scientific Community are not only a way to grants, Nobel prize, and glory, but rather the enterprise for making the Truth from incoming information. However, the human factor rejects both effectively the revolutionary true papers, and absurd ones: the genius often looks like crazy one; recall the photo with the tongue of Albert Einstein and rejection of the million USD by Grigori Perelman. That is why the following text found no place in serious journals, so the reader could decide for himself is author a genius like TV Doctor Who or a ``crazy scientist'' like Nicola Tesla.
\end{abstract}

\maketitle

The founder of post-modern Science is Albert Einstein. His contribution has not disproven the founder of the modern Science - Isaak Newton but rather determined the area of the applicability of Newton's Physics. For such minor (compared to Newton's) contribution Albert's dead body was ash-ed and disposed in wind air. When Albert was asked what is time, he answered, that it is what a clock measure. So, in authority of the science founder, I write the following definition of Nature. Nature is defined as what Standard Instruments measure and the Instruments are what measure Nature. In order to measure, one must have in ideal the unchanging Instruments. Recall how they kept the Standard meter unchanged in France.

The well-accepted definition of Nature and Reality as what we feel is linked to subjective human nature, thus it is not perfect at all: many see mass-hallucinations, e.g., they have seen in Adolf Hitler a Saviour, a Hero, a Priest, and a Saint. But all that feeling was due to the absence of reason in the feelings of the impure heart.
Click to expand...

I said, self publish on amazon, not because i considered your work worth publishing but because you were griping that you cant get published.

And having read "some" of the page you posted i can see why no one is willing to publish
 
ChristineM

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
It Aint Necessarily So said:
Have you ever noticed the pun in their slogan, "TED: Ideas worth spreading"?

Ted (verb) - turn over and spread out (grass, hay, or straw) to dry or for bedding. "you will need to ted the hay before it can be raked and baled"
Click to expand...

Never considered it. I have never heard the archaic usage of ted. Ta for the info
 
shunyadragon

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
questfortruth said:
Do you like the following first page? Can you read it, or it is in Chinese?

\title{They look for matter in Dark Matter, because Non-material Dark Matter can falsify falsifiable Physics and Math}

\author{Dmitri Martila}
\affiliation{Institute of Physics, Tartu University}
\email{[email protected]}

\date{8.Nov.2019}

\begin{abstract}
Science is falsifiable, tells well accepted Popper's criterion of Science. So, it is not surprising then, that Science can be false. I know, that I know nothing, says the Greek philosopher. Science is defined as the quest for knowledge. The journals of Scientific Community are not only a way to grants, Nobel prize, and glory, but rather the enterprise for making the Truth from incoming information. However, the human factor rejects both effectively the revolutionary true papers, and absurd ones: the genius often looks like crazy one; recall the photo with the tongue of Albert Einstein and rejection of the million USD by Grigori Perelman. That is why the following text found no place in serious journals, so the reader could decide for himself is author a genius like TV Doctor Who or a ``crazy scientist'' like Nicola Tesla.
\end{abstract}

\maketitle

The founder of post-modern Science is Albert Einstein. His contribution has not disproven the founder of the modern Science - Isaak Newton but rather determined the area of the applicability of Newton's Physics. For such minor (compared to Newton's) contribution Albert's dead body was ash-ed and disposed in wind air. When Albert was asked what is time, he answered, that it is what a clock measure. So, in authority of the science founder, I write the following definition of Nature. Nature is defined as what Standard Instruments measure and the Instruments are what measure Nature. In order to measure, one must have in ideal the unchanging Instruments. Recall how they kept the Standard meter unchanged in France.

The well-accepted definition of Nature and Reality as what we feel is linked to subjective human nature, thus it is not perfect at all: many see mass-hallucinations, e.g., they have seen in Adolf Hitler a Saviour, a Hero, a Priest, and a Saint. But all that feeling was due to the absence of reason in the feelings of the impure heart.
Click to expand...

First, there is a misunderstanding here concerning what is the role of falsification in science. Science itself is not falsifiable as a whole. The process of falsification applies to individual theories and hypothesis based on 'objective verifiable evidence.'

Second, nature is not 'defined as what Standard Instruments measure and the Instruments are what measure Nature. In order to measure, one must have in ideal the unchanging Instruments. Recall how they kept the Standard meter unchanged in France.' Actually the 'Standard Meter' in France is only an estimate of a nacro scale measurements for what is considered the Metric System of the past, and only has practical application of everyday use on a large scale. Your source has not presented a well-accepted definition of Nature and Reality.

Your reference to Albert Einstein's view of time is inaccurate and misleading. The reference you gave only represents a practical use of time in our everyday life, and not how Einstein views time in terms of the greater reality and physics. To Einstein time is relative to space time relationship of relativity, time is not constant as in Newtonian physics, and does not exist beyond this. Before the beginning of our universe space and time did not exist in the Quantum World that preceded our universe, and only exists in other possible universes.
 
Last edited:
questfortruth

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
shunyadragon said:
First, there is a misunderstanding here concerning what is the role of falsification in science.
Click to expand...
Then I must add a disclaimer to the book: "This book is not meant to convince anybody of anything, it can be considered as sophisticated playful teasing of Science. Enjoy not logic, but the funny style. LOL."
 
Last edited:
ChristineM

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
questfortruth said:
This book is not meant to convince anybody of anything, it can be considered as sophisticated playful teasing of Science. Enjoy not logic, but the funny style.
Click to expand...

Ok so all the threads you made trying to convince everyone that you have rewritten science are just a joke... There was once a faire called nough
 
questfortruth

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
ChristineM said:
Ok so all the threads you made trying to convince everyone that you have rewritten science are just a joke... There was once a faire called nough
Click to expand...
David took these words to heart and was very much afraid of Achish king of Gath.
So he pretended to be insane in their presence; and while he was in their hands he acted like a madman, making marks on the doors of the gate and letting saliva run down his beard.
Achish said to his servants, “Look at the man! He is insane! Why bring him to me? 1Sam.21.
 
ChristineM

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
questfortruth said:
David took these words to heart and was very much afraid of Achish king of Gath.
So he pretended to be insane in their presence; and while he was in their hands he acted like a madman, making marks on the doors of the gate and letting saliva run down his beard.
Achish said to his servants, “Look at the man! He is insane! Why bring him to me? 1Sam.21.
Click to expand...


And now it all makes sense (actually it did before but your confirmation is appreciated)
 
Spirit of Light

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
Why would someone play insane? What is the benefit of it when the result is that most people will make fun or treat you badly? Or get irritated by your lack of understanding of reality
 
questfortruth

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
Subduction Zone said:
That remains to be seen.
Click to expand...
As you know, I am composing a book about Falsified Science. Can I use the following?

If the Theory of Darwin has been accepted by a single man on the planet, but humankind would be firmly rejecting it, then soon or later this man will become Creation Scientist as well. Thus, there is the collective mind of the humankind, like one of the bees colony.

The difficulty to accept a new theory, or to reject disproven one, is due to the inertia of the collective mind and non-developed person's will to follow its own logic. People listen to the feelings of own heart, but the collective mind (and impure spirit and dirty desires) is in there.
 
Spirit of Light

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
questfortruth said:
Jesus Christ also spoke parables. Too much Truth can kill you.



People here have no names. I am sure, someone will dig the blacklist for that holy name.
Click to expand...
Jesus was enlightened TO the truth, You have in my understanding a very limited grip of the truth, so it would be safe for you to not play insane.
And even your name here is Qouestfortruth. What truth are you looking for? Because if you distort your word so much that even you can not see the truth or false in them. How should others understand you? Jesus did speak in parables but if people needed an explanation, he gave it to them, so far you have not given any sane explanation of your "truth"
 
questfortruth

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
Amanaki said:
so far you have not given any sane explanation of your "truth"
Click to expand...
The difficulty to accept a new theory, or to reject disproven one, is due to the inertia of the collective mind and non-developed person's will follow its own logic. People listen to the feelings of own heart, but the collective mind (also known as the fashion mode) and impure spirit and dirty desires are in there.
 
Spirit of Light

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
questfortruth said:
The difficulty to accept a new theory, or to reject disproven one, is due to the inertia of the collective mind and non-developed person's will follow its own logic. People listen to the feelings of own heart, but the collective mind (also known as the fashion mode) and impure spirit and dirty desires are in there.
Click to expand...
To understand a new theory can take time, yes, But when Theory is totally wrong even for an untrained person, why would someone even wish to obtain this new knowledge?
I can not see there is a chance that you will gain many followers from your theory.
And I asked again. Why is your theory right and every other theory wrong in science? this is something you have claimed, that i think most people disagree with you in.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top