questfortruth
Well-Known Member
Respect my author's rights!!!
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Disproof of all Science
- Thread starter questfortruth
- Start date
-
- Tags
- mathematics
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
The fear of death. We heal the fear of death.
Do you? Do you respect other authors? Do you respect science and those who write about it? Do you even respect those who post valid criticism on the threads you create?
And have a happy birthday.
Spirit of Light
Be who ever you want
You do know that the only certain thing about life is that we going to die one day?
And honestly, your words do not calm or take away the fear of dying for people, it actually creates more fear because of what you say is so far from the truth that you sound more and more insane
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
What is recommended prize of the manuscript, if it is 70 pages long?
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
I love and respect all good souls. I am kind and carrying. Thank you for Happy Birthday.
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
The gaps in knowledge were in the time of Newton, and in time of Einstein, as well today.
Thus, we have no reason to kill the God of the Gaps. Having such power, we lose the fear of death.
Spirit of Light
Be who ever you want
You claim to be an Orthodox Christian, but first you speak only about science, then suddenly you turn 180 degrees and now every single scientist and science is a fault, but you are the one who has the answer to everything. Do you not see that this can lead to think you kind of lost grip of reality?
And I can not answer directly back on what you did write because I have no idea what it means.
You wrote.
The gaps in knowledge were in the time of Newton, and in time of Einstein, as well today.
Thus, we have no reason to kill the God of the Gaps. Having such power, we lose the fear of death.
Thus, we have no reason to kill the God of the Gaps. Having such power, we lose the fear of death.
You may believe you do but your posts most definitely do not.
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
I love people and I love the truth. I love truth more.
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
The reality seems to be evil: ISIS, terrorists, disrespect, trolling, bullying against minorities.
But it is an illusion. Problems are the borders, edges of the happy world. Do not sink into the problems.
Spirit of Light
Be who ever you want
I do not try to disrespect you or bully you, my concern is that you are digging your self down in something you struggle to get out of.
The reality on earth is that it is suffering yes. But to get away from the suffering we must look at the cause of the suffering, And if we cling to what happens around us we will suffer because we are afraid of what we see, and our ego tells us that it is evil toward ourself if we suffer.
Try to see what members here trying to tell you like help for you to find the truth you looking for.
But the reason you gain a lot of negative comments toward you is the no sense of reality kind of posts and answer you give.
I know you looking for truth, but truth can only be found within ourselves, Look within you to understand why you struggle to see the truth. (only an advice)
If you say so.
dfnj
Well-Known Member
Using Godel's incompleteness proof with regards to mathematics somehow has greater implications into other fields is generally frowned upon. But if you were going to say that it applies then you cannot say science is "wrong". What you could say because science uses mathematics to describe truth about nature, and mathematics is a language, and all languages have limitations bounded by the implications of Godel's incompleteness proof, then you could make the assertion there will never be a way to know if any grand unifying theory of physics is proven or can be proven to be complete and accurate.
This is very much a different thing than saying science is "wrong". Science over the last 200 years has been breathtakingly successfully in disproving silly superstitions and creating a material abundance in life for more of us to have enough leisure time to even contemplate God.
But what I would say about science, in a similar way to what you have done as if beating a hornet's nest with stick, is the people who hold science in a higher esteem over religion lack humility when it comes to the assumptions of their own belief systems. People who are strong proponents of science lack humility. There are hidden assumptions to scientific World-view or what is known as philosophical materialism that do not hold up well when scrutinized. Just google, "quantum mechanics debunks philosophical materialism" and watch the videos that come up and their arguments against the absolute truth of philosophical materialism.
Rupert Sheldrake is a scientist who has studied the problem of scientific world-view of philosophical materialism for many years. In the following "banned" TED talk, Rupert takes basic assumptions of science, considers them to be hypotheses, and then proceeds to apply the scientific method to them to see how they hold up under scrutiny. For me this has always been a fascinating topic because I am always interested in the edges of knowledge and I just love the way Rupert Sheldrake is always thinking outside the box of the standard model of the thinking.
I've watched this video 20 times and it never gets old for me. Language matters even in science.
Last edited:
dfnj
Well-Known Member
It's funny when people who lack love and respect of others question its existence in others.
ratiocinator
Lightly seared on the reality grill.
Nonsense. Scientific theories are never proved or shown to be complete. The reason has nothing to do with Gödel's theorems.
I can see why it was "banned" - from just the first third or so, it's obvious the guy doesn't understand cosmology and can't tell the difference between a dogma and a theory...
TED is not a platform for pseudoscience
Length of the manuscript is meaningless. It is the accuracy and relevance of the content. What you have presented so far is not accurate nor has no relevance to science, nor the contemporary role of math in science.
Science is simply descriptive and predictive of the nature of our physical existence, and math is part of the science tool box. Science is extremely successful in doing this. How science is used or misused by humans is not determined by the foundations sciences.
Science does not prove nor disprove anything. Many of the other members of RF have posted accurate specifics of your errors and misrepresentation of science.
For example; Einstein's first published papers on general relativity and the relationship of matter and energy amounts tonly 10-20 pages.
Last edited:
If you love truth you would represent science and math more accurately and honestly.
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
Do you like the following first page? Can you read it, or it is in Chinese?
\title{They look for matter in Dark Matter, because Non-material Dark Matter can falsify falsifiable Physics and Math}
\author{Dmitri Martila}
\affiliation{Institute of Physics, Tartu University}
\email{[email protected]}
\date{8.Nov.2019}
\begin{abstract}
Science is falsifiable, tells well accepted Popper's criterion of Science. So, it is not surprising then, that Science can be false. I know, that I know nothing, says the Greek philosopher. Science is defined as the quest for knowledge. The journals of Scientific Community are not only a way to grants, Nobel prize, and glory, but rather the enterprise for making the Truth from incoming information. However, the human factor rejects both effectively the revolutionary true papers, and absurd ones: the genius often looks like crazy one; recall the photo with the tongue of Albert Einstein and rejection of the million USD by Grigori Perelman. That is why the following text found no place in serious journals, so the reader could decide for himself is author a genius like TV Doctor Who or a ``crazy scientist'' like Nicola Tesla.
\end{abstract}
\maketitle
The founder of post-modern Science is Albert Einstein. His contribution has not disproven the founder of the modern Science - Isaak Newton but rather determined the area of the applicability of Newton's Physics. For such minor (compared to Newton's) contribution Albert's dead body was ash-ed and disposed in wind air. When Albert was asked what is time, he answered, that it is what a clock measure. So, in authority of the science founder, I write the following definition of Nature. Nature is defined as what Standard Instruments measure and the Instruments are what measure Nature. In order to measure, one must have in ideal the unchanging Instruments. Recall how they kept the Standard meter unchanged in France.
The well-accepted definition of Nature and Reality as what we feel is linked to subjective human nature, thus it is not perfect at all: many see mass-hallucinations, e.g., they have seen in Adolf Hitler a Saviour, a Hero, a Priest, and a Saint. But all that feeling was due to the absence of reason in the feelings of the impure heart.
Last edited: