• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Should Democrats censor Bernie Sanders for grilling an appointee over his basic Chrisitan beliefs?

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
The American Civil Liberties Union also weighed in, saying that it was Vought’s views which threatened the principle of religious freedom.

Which is the problem Bernie was addressing. He didn't care that Vought was Christian, only that he had at one time condemned a particular group based on scripture. Bernie made his decision based on that, not the scripture itself.
 

whirlingmerc

Well-Known Member
The issue isn't that he believes John 3; the issue is that he criticized a Christian woman for showing compassion toward Muslims.

Negatory! All Christians should show compassion to everyone. The issue was someone was teaching contrary to their statement of faith.

The theological issue was the woman taught the God of the Bible was the same God as that of the Koran and both are on the same par for achieving salvation. Historically, Christians historically don't believe that and the Bible doesn't support it. Historically, Muslims don't believe it either

As a private religious school by law a religious school is allowed to have faculty that teach in accordance to their statements of faith and allowed to have faculty providing for an experience of immersion of faith in all aspects of curriculem, recognize the Lordship of Christ in all subject areas of learning.
 
Last edited:

whirlingmerc

Well-Known Member
Which is the problem Bernie was addressing. He didn't care that Vought was Christian, only that he had at one time condemned a particular group based on scripture. Bernie made his decision based on that, not the scripture itself.


The context of John 3:16 is that all people are condemned and in Jesus the condemnation is taken away. Is Bernie Biblically illiterate?

So according to Bernie, you can believe, but not believe believe? or is it believe believe believe? Say you believe but not really? Believe a verse but never say it out loud? Not in private writings? thus says the church of Bernie

Ps 14 and 52 say 'the fool says in his heart there is no God' The fool may 'believe' in God in theory but makes no difference in actual life.

It is telling that Bernie (or the left in general) would not say the same to Muslims whose faith is similarly exclusive, as most faiths are. The technical tern for Bernies belief system is postmodernism where nothing is really true anyway.
 
Last edited:

whirlingmerc

Well-Known Member
That depends entirely on the post and the view.

In the end, Bernie missed a trick.

It's a true redistribution of wealth, God's righteousness wealth because of Jesus work on the cross!

Christ who was rich became poor that we might become rich.
Christ who had no sin became sin that we might be the righteousness of God in Him.
Christ became a curse for us on the cross that we might be a blessing.

He should celebrate the true redistribution of wealth, God's righteousness wealth in Christ.
'the meek shall inherit the earth' see Psalms 25 and 37.

: )

Hallelujah!!!
 

whirlingmerc

Well-Known Member
Also, John 3:16 has provided sufficient discord of interpretation to tear the Christian nation apart.

But that's neither here nor there.

Might you give an example of how John 3:16 caused epoch discord tearing the Christian nation apart?

Interesting you called the US a Christian nation, you and Bernie seem to not be seeing eye to eye.
 

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
The context of John 3:16 is that all people are condemned and in Jesus the condemnation is taken away. Is Bernie Biblically illiterate?

If all are condemned, then why call out Muslims in particular? Is there a context in what Vought write that shows he is not specifically calling out Muslims?

So according to Bernie, you can believe, but not believe believe? or is it believe believe believe? Say you believe but not really? Believe a verse but never say it out loud? Not in private writings? thus says the church of Bernie

You can believe, but must set aside some of your beliefs (or believe in the bigger picture) in order to carry out the roles of a public official.

It is telling that Bernie (or the left in general) would not say the same to Muslims whose faith is similarly exclusive, as most faiths are. The technical tern for Bernies belief system is postmodernism where nothing is really true anyway.

Then call them out when it happens.

(This is not quite what postmodernism is.)
 

whirlingmerc

Well-Known Member
If all are condemned, then why call out Muslims in particular? Is there a context in what Vought write that shows he is not specifically calling out Muslims?



You can believe, but must set aside some of your beliefs (or believe in the bigger picture) in order to carry out the roles of a public official.



Then call them out when it happens.

(This is not quite what postmodernism is.)

He's more of a postmodernist / atheist and a creature of politics as

I would not 'call them out' as I'm fine with disagreeing with people and respecting their conscience. However there is a constitutional ban on making religious litmus tests such as Bernie contrived.
 

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
Might you give an example of how John 3:16 caused epoch discord tearing the Christian nation apart?

Interesting you called the US a Christian nation, you and Bernie seem to not be seeing eye to eye.
No, I was talking about the Christian nation, not the US nation.

John 3:16 is about predestination ("grace through faith"). I don't know about epoch discord, but everyone knows that Christians are not reconciled over concepts like faith vs. faith and works.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
He's more of a postmodernist / atheist and a creature of politics as

I would not 'call them out' as I'm fine with disagreeing with people and respecting their conscience. However there is a constitutional ban on making religious litmus tests such as Bernie contrived.
There was no litmus test. You already agreed that one cannot always follow one's religious beliefs without consequences.
 

tytlyf

Not Religious
Everyone dies and faces God.
Only in a theocracy. America is a secular nation governed by a secular constitution. You dominionists will stop at nothing apparently to destroy what my founding fathers created.

You already got your 'god' in the pledge of allegiance and on the money, what else do you want? Biblical public education? I bet you do
 

sooda

Veteran Member
Muslims feel Christians 'stand condemned' in their own sense... so Muslims should never hold office??

Sounds like Bernie is philosophically problematic.

What is it you are trying to do here? If you have started 3 threads on the same subject, you must know. Why not be honest and tell us?
 

sooda

Veteran Member
He clearly violating article 4 of the constitution applying a reliiogus test for office or for a trustee of the government. He even picked a view from the most classic believes of Christinas from John 3

So if your not a postmodernitst like Bernie, you're unfit for office?
that's sad

Are you trying to prove religious bias in Bernie Sanders?
 

whirlingmerc

Well-Known Member
Only in a theocracy. America is a secular nation governed by a secular constitution. You dominionists will stop at nothing apparently to destroy what my founding fathers created.

You already got your 'god' in the pledge of allegiance and on the money, what else do you want? Biblical public education? I bet you do


The constitution strictly bans using a religious test for office several ways

The issue is Bernie is ignoring these and suggestion those who believe in John 3:16 (and the following verses) should not be employed by the government.

Which is sad as it's basically a direct quote from Jesus. But Bernie glossed over that trying to blame Wheaton college and trying to blame a Trump budget director nomination. A thinly veiled attack on the historical Christian plain understanding of the words.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
The constitution strictly bans using a religious test for office several ways

The issue is Bernie is ignoring these and suggestion those who believe in John 3:16 (and the following verses) should not be employed by the government.

Which is sad as it's basically a direct quote from Jesus.
Please, quote and link where he did this.

and no. You have no valid reason to claim that it was a direct quote from Jesus.
 

sooda

Veteran Member
The constitution strictly bans using a religious test for office several ways

The issue is Bernie is ignoring these and suggestion those who believe in John 3:16 (and the following verses) should not be employed by the government.

Which is sad as it's basically a direct quote from Jesus.

Book of John Estimated Range of Dating: 90-120 A.D.

Gospel of John
 

whirlingmerc

Well-Known Member
Please, quote and link where he did this.

and no. You have no valid reason to claim that it was a direct quote from Jesus.

Of course it is.
You can look at the chapter in John 3

Exactly what Bernie Sanders was attacking was Jesus discussion
of what he meant when he said John 3:16 and in partitcular John 3:18

In the end it suggests Bernie is Biblically illiterate BUT willing to pontificate... which is a really bad combination.
 

sooda

Veteran Member
The constitution strictly bans using a religious test for office several ways

The issue is Bernie is ignoring these and suggestion those who believe in John 3:16 (and the following verses) should not be employed by the government.

Which is sad as it's basically a direct quote from Jesus. But Bernie glossed over that trying to blame Wheaton college and trying to blame a Trump budget director nomination. A thinly veiled attack on the historical Christian plain understanding of the words.

Not if they are biased against Muslims, Jews, Atheists etc.
 
Top