• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Should Democrats censor Bernie Sanders for grilling an appointee over his basic Chrisitan beliefs?

whirlingmerc

Well-Known Member
No, the issue was whether a person holding office in a nation of diverse and free religious expression should hold the opinion that Muslims "stand condemned" simply because they don't hold his religious views.

Muslims feel Christians 'stand condemned' in their own sense... so Muslims should never hold office??

Sounds like Bernie is philosophically problematic.
 
Last edited:

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
Is this par for the course for the 'new democrats' to make litmus tests for believing basic things Christians believed for thousands of years or is Bernie on his own in promoting anything that opposes his postmodern world views?

Does it even belong in politics?

Bernie Sanders Grills Budget Nominee Russell Vought On Anti-Mu...

Bernie Sanders sounds pretty intolerant of people with Biblical Christian views, he would claim otherwise but he'd be mistaken.
I don't believe that Bernie believes or that Christians believe that Muslims stand condemned.
 

whirlingmerc

Well-Known Member
I don't believe that Bernie believes or that Christians believe that Muslims stand condemned.

really?
John 3:16 - 24 says exactly that

16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. 18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because they have not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son. 19 This is the verdict: light has come into the world, but people loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. 20 Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be exposed. 21 But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what they have done has been done in the sight of God.

That is the classic Christian position.
So Bernie feels anyone believing John 3:16 in context is not fit for office?
really?
 
Last edited:

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
Muslims feel Christians 'stand condemned' in their own sense... so Muslims should never hold office??

Sounds like Bernie is a philosophical train wreck

If a Muslim running for office "...wrote that..." Christians are condemned, then that should be considered.

Sounds like Bernie is sticking to his moral compass.
 

whirlingmerc

Well-Known Member
If a Muslim running for office "...wrote that..." Christians are condemned, then that should be considered.

Sounds like Bernie is sticking to his moral compass.

Bernie did not say the logical equivalent to a Muslim group
He would not garner any votes from the left for that

Which suggests a political compass,
stick his finger in the air and see which way he thinks the wind is blowing
that is hardly a moral compass.
 

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
really?
John 3:16 - 24 says exactly that

16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. 18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because they have not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son. 19 This is the verdict: light has come into the world, but people loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. 20 Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be exposed. 21 But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what they have done has been done in the sight of God.

So Bernie feels anyone believing John 3:16 in context is not fit for office?
really?
Not really. Bernie doesn't judge people "fit for office" based on scripture.

Thank god.
 

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
Bernie did not say the logical equivalent to a Muslim group
He would not garner any votes from the left for that

Which suggests a political compass,
stick his finger in the air and see which way he thinks the wind is blowing
that is hardly a moral compass.

That's an assumption. I am responding to the posted material.

Bernie's history suggests he's pretty steady with his compass.
 

whirlingmerc

Well-Known Member

whirlingmerc

Well-Known Member
I seriously don't think his comments impacted the relationship between Feds and State.

So it's OK for Bernie to disrespect the classical views of Christians and violate the constitution?
While crossing his fingers behind his back and saying he isn't?

It was unconstitutional according to article 4 as well as tacky.
Bernie Sanders's Religious Test for Christians in Public Office

Shouldn't some Democrat 'man up' and tell Bernie he was wong?
 

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
He lacked steadiness and reasonableness in that line of questioning... which by the way was unconstitutional according to Article IV of the constitution

Bernie Sanders's Religious Test for Christians in Public Office

He violated the constitution and Democrats are fine with it?
that's sad.

But that's the point, he wasn't specifically questioning the candidate's religious beliefs, only his views towards Muslims--and being a candidate for public office and Muslims are a part of our American community, the question is very relevant. Constitutionally relevant even!
 

whirlingmerc

Well-Known Member
But that's the point, he wasn't specifically questioning the candidate's religious beliefs, only his views towards Muslims--and being a candidate for public office and Muslims are a part of our American community, the question is very relevant. Constitutionally relevant even!


The line of questioning was unconstitutional
Bernie Sanders's Religious Test for Christians in Public Office

He was saying someone who believed John chapter 3 is unfit for office or an appointment?
seriously?
 

whirlingmerc

Well-Known Member
But that's the point, he wasn't specifically questioning the candidate's religious beliefs, only his views towards Muslims--and being a candidate for public office and Muslims are a part of our American community, the question is very relevant. Constitutionally relevant even!

The point he was attacking is straight out of John 3 which all Christians classically believe
of course he was attacking his personal faith

He also was attacking a Christian institution's long held beliefs
Is that the 'new Democrat talking points?"
that's sad
 

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
So it's OK for Bernie to disrespect the classical views of Christians and violate the constitution?
While crossing his fingers behind his back and saying he isn't?

It was unconstitutional according to article 4 as well as tacky.
Bernie Sanders's Religious Test for Christians in Public Office

Shouldn't some Democrat 'man up' and tell Bernie he was wong?
Let me be clear: it's okay for any individual in the world to disrespect the views of Christians--in that, I agree with the United States' first amendment. (Go Salman! #salmanrushdie #firstamendment #youarewrong)

And, again, I really don't think his words threaten the relationship between Feds and the State.
 

whirlingmerc

Well-Known Member
Let me be clear: it's okay for any individual in the world to disrespect the views of Christians--in that, I agree with the United States' first amendment. (Go Salman! #salmanrushdie #firstamendment #youarewrong)

And, again, I really don't think his words threaten the relationship between Feds and the State.

He clearly violating article 4 of the constitution applying a reliiogus test for office or for a trustee of the government. He even picked a view from the most classic believes of Christinas from John 3

So if your not a postmodernitst like Bernie, you're unfit for office?
that's sad
 

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
The line of questioning was unconstitutional
Bernie Sanders's Religious Test for Christians in Public Office

He was saying someone who believed John chapter 3 is unfit for office or an appointment?
seriously?

The point he was attacking is straight out of John 3 which all Christians classically believe
of course he was attacking his personal faith

He also was attacking a Christian institution's long held beliefs
Is that the 'new Democrat talking points?"
that's sad

I did not see him in the video attacking the candidate based on religion, only on a possible bias towards Muslims.

The Biblical quote does not call out Muslims regardless. You appear to be the one using Scripture as a political weapon not Bernie.
 

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
He clearly violating article 4 of the constitution applying a reliiogus test for office or for a trustee of the government. He even picked a view from the most classic believes of Christinas from John 3

So if your not a postmodernitst like Bernie, you're unfit for office?
that's sad
I believe that discovery is properly conducted when it reveals a religious bias.

This benefits not only the constitution but the people of the nation.
 
Top