Did you read the post to which you responded? Throwing misinformation around indiscriminately only fuels the opposition’s points. I get the disenchantment, but it’s not serving your needs.
There was no misinformation in my post. All those things are written black on white in the bible. And the vast majority of them are actually quite famous as well.
I find it absolutely baffling that someone, especially someone that is supposed to know the book well, can honestly deny those things to be in that book.
Sorry, but I'm really not interested in a "debate" about how what the bible literally says isn't "really" what it says but how it actually means something completely different or what-have-you.
Sorry, but no.
Your book says what it says.
And excuse me, but there is NO context in which it is EVER ok or moral to engage in
the slaughter of infants and babies.
I can honestly tell you that you will not succeed in convincing me that such a context exists and I'm not even interested in your arguments.
This might be one of the very rare times where you'll see me argue somewhat dogmatically.
It is what it is. The slaughter of infants and babies is repulsive.
And if you are again going to deny that such slaughter is in the bible and carried out by "the good guys", I'm just going to laugh in your face and shake my head while saying "amalekites".