Your first question, for example, tries to equate "acknowledgement of white privilege" with "racism."
You could use some work on reading comprehension.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Your first question, for example, tries to equate "acknowledgement of white privilege" with "racism."
They should recognize that there are no whites.Assuming White Privilege is a problem.
How should White folks behave differently?
To begin with: by acknowledging that white privilege is a problem rather than treating it as an 'assumption'.
Except that it's derogatory.To be sure, there is nothing wrong with being a "mongrel".
Except that it's derogatory.
Are you kidding?long long plan, create birth rate in UEurope, Japan, US and bring different than white people to fix it, create Obama (as archetype) types - no clear race, no clear country no clear sex orientation... another archetype recent Royal marriage.
Even for canines, it is.Mongoloid is. I think mongrel is not.
Mongoloid is. I think mongrel is not.
Depends on context and target. Mongoloid is a skull type. Saying to a person is typically an insult. Mongrel is about dog breeds but when used at a person is about characteristics typically race or breeding stock based on social/economic class.
you are right, man who wrote that was mix himself , mother Japanese, father a noble from Roman times very rich from times of Jesus.Mongoloid is. I think mongrel is not.
The other two groups being the Caucasoid and the Negroid?
No, my reading comprehension is quite fine, thank you. You said: "How is acknowledging the pervasiveness of white privilege different than racism?" To ask how one thing compares to another implies some sort of equivalence. You asked us to compare "acknowledgment of white privilege" and "racism." You asked us to compare "support for criminal justice reform efforts," and "racism." These are no more comparable, one to the other, than asking us to compare a rose to a sequoia. (Unless, of course, you don't care how nonsensical an answer you're likely to get.)You could use some work on reading comprehension.
You ask ...
... and in so doing model a rather pathetic and sophomoric form of white privilege victimhood.
- How is acknowledging the pervasiveness of white privilege different than racism?
- How is sensitivity to the expression of white privilege different than racism?
- How is repudiating the denial of white privilege different than racism?
- How is support for criminal justice reform efforts. different than racism?
Except that it's derogatory.
Assuming White Privilege is a problem.
How should White folks behave differently?
The problem with the term "white privilege" is that it sounds like white people are getting things or treatment that they should not receive. This is what inflames some white people when they hear the term. It's a RIGHT, not a PRIVILEGE, to be treated fairly without regard for race. When someone busts their butt to accomplish things in life and they overcome obstacles to do so, and they never encounter racial discrimination as a barrier, they are not privilTo whatever extent this RIGHT is protected more frequently for white people, than for people of color, that's racial discrimination. Victims of discrimination are just that, innocent victims. We should drop "white privilege" from the dialog and go back to framing the problem as racial discrimination. The meaning is more clear. I have no idea how I can stop having white privilege, since white privilege is simply the absence of being discriminated against. But I do know what I can do to not discriminate against people of color and to do my part to see that they maintain the same RIGHT that I have.
More and more places are becoming "majority minority"Maybe it is for you, but in my town, whites are the minority, and my kids are the only white kids in their class, and they get no special privileges. Neither do I.
Not all white people experience white privilege, and to say they do is itself racist. Do white people living in China receive white privilege? No.
It's more appropriate to say that "majority privilege" exists, as it does all around the world.
...Singling out whites, specifically is in itself anti-white racism.
More and more places are becoming "majority minority"