Frank Goad
Well-Known Member
Why would you ask such a question?Have you made even the slightest effort to investigate the matter on your own?
Just curious was all.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Why would you ask such a question?Have you made even the slightest effort to investigate the matter on your own?
So, it is called "group of stars" in the bible? Please cite.No, that is an invented term by so called science. However, the star groups God referred to were...well..groups of stars.
Just curious was all.
? Disprove existence? How would the Alight mentioning some star groups 'disprove their existence'?? HaNo, scientists can see starts in galaxies with only moderately powerful telescopes. The fact that you can't do so with your naked eye does not disprove their existence. It is time to leave the fishbowl dad
Job 38:31So, it is called "group of stars" in the bible? Please cite.
? Disprove existence? How would the Alight mentioning some star groups 'disprove their existence'?? Ha
So you just don't know the difference between a galaxy and a constellation. And you didn't know that Pleiades and Orion are Greek names.Job 38:31
Pleiades in the Hebrew means this
"Pleiades, a constellation of seven stars"
And Orion means this
"
constellation, Orion
- Orion, the constellation
- constellation (general)"
Orion is a fairly obvious constellation so it does have other names and slightly different versions in other cultures. There is a likely Hebrew name for it. Not so much the Pleiades:So you just don't know the difference between a galaxy and a constellation. And you didn't know that Pleiades and Orion are Greek names.
They are what God called the groups of stars.So you just don't know the difference between a galaxy and a constellation. And you didn't know that Pleiades and Orion are Greek names.
But they're very different sorts of groups.They are what God called the groups of stars.
Do you think there is galaxies beyond the milky way one?
So you just don't know the difference between a galaxy and a constellation. And you didn't know that Pleiades and Orion are Greek names.
If there is a spiritual component/influence in stars, then indeed, the groups God mentioned could have greater significance than you know.But they're very different sorts of groups.
A constellation is just an imaginary picture outlined in the sky by visible stars. from a slightly different perspective they'd look completely different
Galaxies are completely different things.
If there is a spiritual component/influence in stars, then indeed, the groups God mentioned could have greater significance than you know.
If time does not exist as we know it the same in far space then those so called galaxies could be light days away for all we know! Your whole conception of the universe is fatally flawed. We also may need to consider what effect time itself could have on space! The usual methods of measuring distance and time for stars (assuming space and time are the same as a base line taken from this solar system) would lose all value. Therefore the whole concept of 'galaxies' that science posits may be completely wrong.
False. Just because stubborn religious men insist on interpreting all of creation through the belief based filters and lens they use does not mean God tricked them to do so.If, if, if.... and if all that is true, your god is a liar - setting out to deliberately deceive with false evidence.
I'm mystified -- where did you come up with your avatar? One would think you had a better grasp of relativity.If there is a spiritual component/influence in stars, then indeed, the groups God mentioned could have greater significance than you know.
If time does not exist as we know it the same in far space then those so called galaxies could be light days away for all we know! Your whole conception of the universe is fatally flawed. We also may need to consider what effect time itself could have on space! The usual methods of measuring distance and time for stars (assuming space and time are the same as a base line taken from this solar system) would lose all value. Therefore the whole concept of 'galaxies' that science posits may be completely wrong.
Your ratio of huffing and puffing to substantive posting is not good.If, if, if.... and if all that is true, your god is a liar - setting out to deliberately deceive with false evidence.
If you had a grasp of it you would know it does not tell us anything about what time is in the farI'm mystified -- where did you come up with your avatar? One would think you had a better grasp of relativity.
False. Just because stubborn religious men insist on interpreting all of creation through the belief based filters and lens they use does not mean God tricked them to do so.
Your ratio of huffing and puffing to substantive posting is not good.
The only place we have experienced time is here on earth and the solar system area. Period. You do not know what time is like beyond that, so you may not invoke millions of our 'years' out there! Get it?The evidence is quite clear and unambiguous, if it is the case that physics as we understand it doesn't apply out in the universe (or back in time) then it would be staggeringly improbable that it would look exactly as if it does.
If it was set up like that by a god, that god is a barefaced liar.