• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Fermi Paradox has disproven Darwin and UFO

questfortruth

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
Amanaki said:
To have once own theory about reality is fine, But maybe stop seeing everyone around you as a troll when they do not agree with you. Ask your self, "why do mostly everyone disagree with my theory" And the then "may it be that it is the theory is wrong?" If you can not see that sometimes a theory will be wrong, then unfortunately you will become a very lonely person.
Click to expand...
It is wrong to doubt own saying in public arena. One can doubt own thoughts, but never bring the doubt to public.
 
questfortruth

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
Brickjectivity said:
No it doesn't. All evolution can do is explain the differentiation of species on Earth. The paradox doesn't involve evolution but fanciful ideas about aliens.
Click to expand...
Do not quote textbooks. Use my definition of Theory of Evolution. I have my own science. Enter my worldview or stay outside. P.S. It is wrong to doubt own saying in public arena. One can doubt own thoughts, but never bring the doubt to public.
 
Last edited:
Spirit of Light

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
questfortruth said:
- but my church believes in Evolution. I am catholic, you know.
- yes, it is your knowledge then. But my knowledge is different. Because I am orthodox.
I can modify your knowledge while the discussion.
Click to expand...
You can not modify my knowledge :) Yes I am a Buddhist but that does not mean I have less knowledge than a Catholic, just knowledge understood in a different way.
 
questfortruth

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
Amanaki said:
You can not modify my knowledge :) Yes I am a Buddhist but that does not mean I have less knowledge than a Catholic, just knowledge understood in a different way.
Click to expand...
I can add something new to your Buddhism, e.g. I have my own proof of Fermat's Last Theorem.
 
questfortruth

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
Amanaki said:
Fermat`s Theory is not a part of Buddhism so there is nothing that should be added to the teaching :)
Click to expand...
The Buddhism says, that there is Natural World. Correct? The Buddhism says, that there are rules and processes in Nature. Correct? Thus, I am adding to the Natural Processes new information. Look: the Buddhism is your (not my) base, all knowledge even mathematical is part of your Buddhism. First comes religion, then comes science.

And to make you believe, that some definitions in textbooks are not consistent with reality, or can be improved.
 
Spirit of Light

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
questfortruth said:
The Buddhism says, that there is Natural World. Correct? The Buddhism says, that there are rules and processes in Nature. Correct? Thus, I am adding to the Natural Processes new information. Look: the Buddhism is your (not my) base, all knowledge even mathematical is part of your Buddhism. First comes religion, then comes science.

And to make you believe, that some definitions in textbooks are not consistent with reality, or can be improved.
Click to expand...
Buddha teaching is about nature law yes. and very clearly say life is suffering. The teaching is about how to end the suffering (letting go of attachments to the physical world) The teaching that we find in the scripture is more of a guideline to life than a scientific way of thinking)
Science can see some of the truth, but not everything :)
 
Brickjectivity

Brickjectivity

wind and rain touch not this brain
Staff member
Premium Member
questfortruth said:
Do not quote textbooks. Use my definition of Theory of Evolution. I have my own science. Enter my worldview or stay outside. P.S. It is wrong to doubt own saying in public arena. One can doubt own thoughts, but never bring the doubt to public.
Click to expand...
I think the staff will not moderate Science as a faith. We will, however, not tolerate USSR style scientific indoctrination. If you don't accept the scientific results then that is Ok, and your opinion has weight. We will still let you post.

I might understand your opinion about doubt, however why are you asking me to hold up the world with my pinkie? It can barely lift anything, and this is not the time for secrecy. The world is rapidly changing. Information is destroyed daily even while the news stations proclaim that it is being multiplied. Who can find out what was said 2 years ago on the news? Words disappear like flies in winter. Love lasts, but words don't. Love covers a multitude of errors. There is no reason to be secretive, and if you doubt then speak it. Did not Abraham have his doubts? Sarah? Jesus? Even Jesus complained about his own death and prayed not to die. Even so they lived as though they had no doubts.
 
Ouroboros

Ouroboros

Coincidentia oppositorum
questfortruth

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
Brickjectivity said:
I think the staff will not moderate Science as a faith. We will, however, not tolerate USSR style scientific indoctrination. If you don't accept the scientific results then that is Ok, and your opinion has weight. We will still let you post.
Click to expand...
Telling what's on my heart is indoctrination now? Was Jesus the "indoctrinator" too? Yes. I am in good company then. The "absence of Biblical God" can never be scientific result.
 
Last edited:
ChristineM

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
questfortruth said:
(Unfinished, disproven, unholy, and problematic) theory of Evolution consists of following chapters: Theory of Big Bang, Theory of Cosmic Evolution, Theory of Biological Evolution (Darwin's Theory), Social Darwinism.

The Fermi paradox is the contradiction between Theory of Evolution and the sterility of the cosmos.

Conclusions: assuming, that the God does not interfere into physical world, we came to contradiction. Thus, the God interferes.

The aim of the Theory of Evolution is the proof of Atheism. It has failed.

Conclusion: the UFO activity on Earth is the demonic activity, because the cosmos is sterile. Indeed, if the UFO is highest technical machine, it needs a huge technical civilization with huge production facilities and exploitation of nature resources to make UFO. Such one must be seen in our telescopes.

Portal (wormhole) between measurements (between places in time and space) cannot be opened. The portal, when it just occurs, has an infinite curvature. Well look: a circle with a radius of 10 meters has a curvature of the circle line as 1/10 = 0.10. A circle of radius 0.01 meters has a curvature of 100. However, there can be no infinity in the physical world, where everything can be measured (at least in principle). Infinite curvature cannot be measured. Therefore, the portal cannot be opened.

The criticism, that the Humankind is just very lucky to exist within observable part of infinite Universe, and what it miraculously passed through the deadly "filters"; faces the fact, that miracles can not be part of material Theory of Evolution. Any theory is just the consequence of initial input. Therefore, miracles and luck is not the part of a pure material theory.

Opponent ("Opponent" is a fictional character): "perhaps aliens are like our plants and animals. They live happily without any technology."

It contradicts the Theory of Evolution. Latter is the LAW, which justifies our transition from Big Bang to Cosmic Era. If such success is unique, then it is miracle. Thus, there is no Theory of Evolution.

Opponent: "you are a troll."

Was Jesus Christ murdered for "trolling"? Yes. So, I am in very good company then.

Because I face a trolling and satanic disrespect at journals,
I simply need two billion of US dollars to start my own journal company. And time to make it respectful. Then I will accept my own papers without any referee help.
Yes, being the chief editor, I will sent my papers to the referees. But I will not accept any trolling from them. They must find mistakes, not troll my papers.

I have my own science. Enter my worldview or stay outside.

Opponent: "We don't know which one of them are the correct answers yet, and maybe never will, but ignorance of knowing the answer isn't evidence.
Here Are 50 Possible Solutions to the Fermi Paradox..."

- Please define Knowledge.

- Well, it is what your Church knows.

- My Church does not believe in Evolution.

- So, you know then, that Evolution is wrong. But my church believes in Evolution. I am catholic, you know.

- yes, it is your knowledge then. But my knowledge is different. Because I am orthodox. I can modify your knowledge while the discussion.


Click to expand...


Would you please advise how a hypothesis based on incomplete and unknown information, that is riddled with guesswork in any way disproves anything?
 
Spirit of Light

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
questfortruth said:
It is wrong to doubt own saying in public arena. One can doubt own thoughts, but never bring the doubt to public.
Click to expand...
Why is it wrong to sometime show doubt? Is it because someone could take it as a weakness?
It is ok to not doubt teaching, but to say I am always correct no matter how wrong my answers look, that is not the right way to come forth either, or? Because even we do not doubt the teaching, it is not always we understand the teaching 100% as the teacher said it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top