• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Fermi Paradox has disproven Darwin and UFO

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
Because I face a trolling and satanic disrespect at journals, I simply need two billion of US dollars to start my own journal company. And time to make it respectful. Then I will accept my own papers without any referee help.
So no matter what others say or disprove you, You will always be right? isn't that a bit egoistic way of living?
Is giving you valid science trolling to you?
 

Darkforbid

Well-Known Member
Two billion??? It cost about $40 to set up the sort of website you need... Or probably for free if you don't mind advertising on the pages.

Publish what you want when you want.

Remember i asked you once if you were Jim Ryan??? He did that and published loads of pseudo scientific garbage. Became an overnight legend in his own mind

Or a WordPress free template and $1.99 if you want a domain name
 

Heyo

Veteran Member
(Unfinished, disproven, unholy, and problematic) theory of Evolution consists of following chapters: Theory of Big Bang, Theory of Cosmic Evolution, Theory of Biological Evolution (Darwin's Theory), Social Darwinism.

The Fermi paradox is the contradiction between Theory of Evolution and the sterility of the cosmos.

Conclusions: assuming, that the God does not interfere into physical world, we came to contradiction. Thus, the God interferes.
Three paragraphs, three massive misunderstandings of science and logic (and bad English). No wonder nobody wants even start to discuss and instead you're called a troll.
I'm not yet sure if you are a troll, so let's test the hypothesis:
Where did you get your definition of the Theory of Evolution?
Where did you get your definition of the Fermi Paradox?
Where is the contradiction?
 

Jainarayan

ॐ नमो भगवते वासुदेवाय
Staff member
Premium Member
I have my own science. Enter my worldview or stay outside.

Then a worldview and science of one.

I have added:

The criticism, that the Humankind is just very lucky to exist within observable part of infinite Universe, and what it miraculously passed through the deadly "filters"; faces the fact, that miracles can not be part of material Theory of Evolution. Any theory is just the consequence of initial input. Therefore, miracles and luck is not the part of a pure material theory.

I would have left that out.
 

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
Because I face a trolling and satanic disrespect at journals,
I simply need two billion of US dollars to start my own journal company. And time to make it respectful. Then I will accept my own papers without any referee help. Yes, being the chief editor, I will sent my papers to the referees. But I will not accept any trolling from them. They must find mistakes, not troll my papers.

I have my own science. Enter my worldview or stay outside.

Opponent: "you are a troll."

Was Jesus Christ murdered for "trolling"? Yes. So, I am in very good company then.


To have once own theory about reality is fine, But maybe stop seeing everyone around you as a troll when they do not agree with you. Ask your self, "why do mostly everyone disagree with my theory" And the then "may it be that it is the theory is wrong?" If you can not see that sometimes a theory will be wrong, then unfortunately you will become a very lonely person.
 

dianaiad

Well-Known Member
(Unfinished, disproven, unholy, and problematic) theory of Evolution consists of following chapters: Theory of Big Bang, Theory of Cosmic Evolution, Theory of Biological Evolution (Darwin's Theory), Social Darwinism.

The Fermi paradox is the contradiction between Theory of Evolution and the sterility of the cosmos.

Conclusions: assuming, that the God does not interfere into physical world, we came to contradiction. Thus, the God interferes.

Wait. what? Begging a question there, aren't you? Not to mention that the last time I looked at the 'Fermi' paradox (but where IS everybody?) I sure didn't see what you evidently have.

The aim of the Theory of Evolution is the proof of Atheism. It has failed.[/quote]

Wait.

The AIM of the Theory of Evolution is the proof of atheism?

Since when?

I had to stop there. Not that the Fermi paradox thing made any sense either, mind you.

OK, please pass the popcorn....
 

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
(Unfinished, disproven, unholy, and problematic) theory of Evolution consists of following chapters: Theory of Big Bang, Theory of Cosmic Evolution, Theory of Biological Evolution (Darwin's Theory), Social Darwinism.

You could not possibly be more wrong. Only one of your list of things? Is within the scope of the Scientific Theory of Evolution.

Darwin started it, but it's long since been expanded on, and improved far-far beyond the simplistic model Darwin wrote. If Darwin was alive today? He'd be amazed how far it's come from his ideas.

None of the other things you listed, have anything to do with Scientific Evolution.

Especially that last bit of garbage: Social Darwinism is garbage, non-scientific non-think. It's bigotry writ large, it's akin to religious claims. It's no more evolution than NAZIsm was Socialist.
 

Bird123

Well-Known Member
(Unfinished, disproven, unholy, and problematic) theory of Evolution consists of following chapters: Theory of Big Bang, Theory of Cosmic Evolution, Theory of Biological Evolution (Darwin's Theory), Social Darwinism.

The Fermi paradox is the contradiction between Theory of Evolution and the sterility of the cosmos.

Conclusions: assuming, that the God does not interfere into physical world, we came to contradiction. Thus, the God interferes.

The aim of the Theory of Evolution is the proof of Atheism. It has failed.

Conclusion: the UFO activity on Earth is the demonic activity, because the cosmos is sterile. Indeed, if the UFO is highest technical machine, it needs a huge technical civilization with huge production facilities and exploitation of nature resources to make UFO. Such one must be seen in our telescopes.

Portal (wormhole) between measurements (between places in time and space) cannot be opened. The portal, when it just occurs, has an infinite curvature. Well look: a circle with a radius of 10 meters has a curvature of the circle line as 1/10 = 0.10. A circle of radius 0.01 meters has a curvature of 100. However, there can be no infinity in the physical world, where everything can be measured (at least in principle). Infinite curvature cannot be measured. Therefore, the portal cannot be opened.

The criticism, that the Humankind is just very lucky to exist within observable part of infinite Universe, and what it miraculously passed through the deadly "filters"; faces the fact, that miracles can not be part of material Theory of Evolution. Any theory is just the consequence of initial input. Therefore, miracles and luck is not the part of a pure material theory.

Because I face a trolling and satanic disrespect at journals,
I simply need two billion of US dollars to start my own journal company. And time to make it respectful. Then I will accept my own papers without any referee help. Yes, being the chief editor, I will sent my papers to the referees. But I will not accept any trolling from them. They must find mistakes, not troll my papers.

I have my own science. Enter my worldview or stay outside.

Opponent: "you are a troll."

Was Jesus Christ murdered for "trolling"? Yes. So, I am in very good company then.




Where are all the aliens? Is there a reason there is so great a distance between planets? The answer is so simple. The distance is there because by the time one figures out how to span that distance, one has gained enough wisdom to know not to screw up the world you visit.

There is a learning curve that should not be breached. Wisdom is gained on the journey to acquire knowledge. To short cut this journey can bring the disaster results mentioned.

Why do we not see space ships flying everywhere? The distance is not crossed flying through space. On the other hand, there should be space ships on short distances. Why can't we see them? Our technology has not advanced far enough. We are just now getting to the point where we can discover something as large as a planet and that is at it's infancy.

AS I see it, Generations upon generations must pass before mankind will really be ready for an encounter. After all, people can't even handle the diversity of our own world. People also must grow out of the need to conquer, rule and control. There is much to learn before mankind becomes ready.

Have aliens been on Earth? I would say so. They would probably study the science just as we study life forms on our own planet. To them, it would be obvious mankind is not ready. What would they really have to say to us at this point? Not much.

Hmmmm??? I do need to find one of their ships. I'm having trouble getting my flying saucer off the ground. OK! OK! It's time to go. Oh yes, If you hear these stories of alien abduction using a bunch of painful probes, don't believe it. With their technology, you won't feel or remember a thing.
 

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
The biggest problem with the Fermi Paradox is its assumption that living beings will care about space travel, achieve the skills necessary to leave planets and be willing to make the effort. On Earth curiosity is a property of vertebrates; but there are plenty of animal families that survive, just fine, without curiosity. Out of these, fewer have imagination. Fermi Paradox is a fun toy not a theory. It inexplicably assumes evolution on all planets moves some species towards advanced technical skills, a desire to leave a planet's gravity well, curiosity, imagination and passion. It also assumes every such planet has an imperfect reproductive process (which is what makes evolution possible).

To me it seems more likely that on most habitable planets life will achieve some stable form and stay in that form, just like our sponges did on Earth for so many periods of time.
Opponent: "perhaps aliens are like our plants and animals. They live happily without any technology."

It contradicts the Theory of Evolution. Latter is the LAW, which justifies our transition from Big Bang to Cosmic Era. If such success is unique, then it is miracle. Thus, there is no Theory of Evolution.
 
Last edited:

ratiocinator

Lightly seared on the reality grill.
(Unfinished, disproven, unholy, and problematic) theory of Evolution consists of following chapters: Theory of Big Bang, Theory of Cosmic Evolution, Theory of Biological Evolution (Darwin's Theory), Social Darwinism.

Wrong.

The Fermi paradox is the contradiction between Theory of Evolution and the sterility of the cosmos.

Wrong.

Conclusions: assuming, that the God does not interfere into physical world, we came to contradiction.

Wrong and illogical.

The aim of the Theory of Evolution is the proof of Atheism.

Wrong.

After that, it just gets worse.
 

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
Opponent: "perhaps aliens are like our plants and animals. They live happily without any technology."

It contradicts the Theory of Evolution. Latter is the LAW, which justifies our transition from Big Bang to Cosmic Era. If such success is unique, then it is miracle. Thus, there is no Theory of Evolution.
Why do you call someone an Opponent? by the way, there was earlier a member who used to call us Opponent, are you the same person with a new account?
Mod: if this question is not allowed in public chat please remove it.
 

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
Why do you call someone an Opponent? by the way, there was earlier a member who used to call us Opponent, are you the same person with a new account?
Mod: if this question is not allowed in public chat please remove it.
Mod: this thread will be approved in afterlife. So, if you can, then please do not kill it.

Opponent is my imaginary friend.
 

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
Is something wrong just because we believe different? And how do you know your answer is always the correct one?
- but my church believes in Evolution. I am catholic, you know.
- yes, it is your knowledge then. But my knowledge is different. Because I am orthodox.
I can modify your knowledge while the discussion.
 
Top