• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Kavanaugh redux ?

shmogie

Well-Known Member
As this alleged ¨impeachment inquiry" stumbles along in the House of Representatives, tactics used in the attempted lynching of Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh in his confirmation hearing in the Senate, are being used again.

In the confirmation hearing, Senator Feinstein had the letter from the first accusing woman laying out the accusation long before the hearing. She and her staff met with Ford, probably coached her, sent her to a democrat activist lawyer, and told no one.

Adam Schiff, the chair of the House intelligence committee, and his staff, met with Trumps accuser, before a complaint was filed, no doubt coached him, and sent him to a democrat activist lawyer. When asked if he had had contact with the complainant, Schiff said ¨ we have had no contact with this person¨, this was after his meeting with the accuser, and before the public knew of the meeting, Schiff told an absolute lie to the American people. Did the IG who found the complaint credible know this ? More on this in a minute.

After Ford told some really strange things about the attempted rape that no one saw, other accusers began popping up, again, with bizarre stories that no one could corroborate...........................

Now, as many predicted, the democrat activist lawyer has more complainants, just like with Kavanaugh.

The entire impeachment hearing supposedly being conducted, is really down the rabbit hole where the Cheshire cat lives.

Only twice has a President been impeached. Neither was removed from office.

In both cases the opening of the inquiry was predicated on a vote of all the House members, the representatives of all the people.

In this Trump operation, the peoples representatives have had no voice in the matter, the alleged inquiry was started by the representative from one California district, the Speaker of the House.

In the impeachment of both Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton, the inquiry was conducted fully open and transparent in the Judiciary committee. The committee that deals with all interactions with the law.

This inquiry is being conducted by the intelligence committee, a committee where the chairman can decide that hearings are held in secret, the chairman being Adam Schiff. Two hearings in secret have already been conducted. One with the IG of the intelligence agencies, and one with the resigned ambassador who Schiff felt had pertinent information. The Republicans have asked numerous times for the transcripts to be released to the public, Pelosi and Schiff have refused.

Remember their outrage and folderol about releasing transcripts that the democrats demanded ? What happened ? What is in this testimony that Pelosi and Schiff do not want you or I to see ? Not only can the chairman of this committee decide what is to be done in secret, the other members are bound by an oath of secrecy, they cannot divulge the material. Though the Republicans were there, and questioned the witnesses, they cannot say what occurred and was said. One went to far as to say the testimonies didn´t help the democrats.

Now we have a fact witness to the complaint, running the investigation related to the complaint. That happens no where else in the country.

Schiff, should be put under oath, and questioned about his part in developing the complaint, and if he in fact helped craft it, he should be recused from investigating it.

The democrats have been pounding the drum of impeachment almost from the inauguration.

They manipulated things so that Mueller was appointed, and spent two and a half years and 24 million dollars to come up with a report.

Adam Schiff numerous times said there was blatant evidence of impeachable offences by Trump that Schiff had, he produced nothing.

We were told by the democrats that the Mueller report would nail Trumps hide to the wall, and impeachable offenses would be glaringly obvious in the report, they weren´t.

Now we have the democrat star chamber working, on the say so of two California politicians. Secret, without the vote of the peoples representatives, kept from the eyes and ears of the people.

Except for declaring war, impeachment is the most important thing Congress can do.

This bizarre parody of a banana republic is not following the precedent of two previous impeachment efforts that were based on votes and the judiciary committee, with all proceedings open to the people,

This abysmal process was placed in the intelligence committee for the very purpose of keeping it secret, managed by one of the more standout liars in congress.
 

Daemon Sophic

Avatar in flux
gop-tears-impotent-rage.jpg
 

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
Rage ? Naw, more like amusement. The gang that can´t shoot straight are shooting themselves once again.

Their shtick will only more establish them as clowns.
It will also establish the third U.S. President to have been impeached.
 

shmogie

Well-Known Member
It will also establish the third U.S. President to have been impeached.
Which, of course, will be the third time a President is not removed from office. That means found innocent by trial in the Senate.

Which, of course, will show impeachment to have been a waste of time and money. While urgent issues were ignored in the House.

Go democrats, the more clown paint you put on your face, the better it is.
 

shmogie

Well-Known Member
Naw, more like juvenile nonsense from the wing-nut fringe of Trump's basket of deplorables.
I see. Recitation of the true circumstances by comparison with impeachment precedent and democrat manipulation makes me a wing nut. I note you offered no defense for the aberrations, just the typical democrat floppy mouth and name calling.

So, I can only conclude that you favor secret hearings kept from the people, and a fact witness, confirmed serial liar, and premiere political hack leading this, whatever it is.

As to your name calling, people who employ that tactic cannot offer a cogent semi intelligent response, so they fall back on the tried and true method of the third grade.

BTW, FO
 
Top