stvdv
Veteran Member: I Share (not Debate) my POV
Revolting Revoltinger Revoltingest
made the search in 150.000 posts easy, just 12 left
Sequence is very clear: Revolting, Revoltinger to Revoltingest
But why the word Revolting...
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Rabbi Sucks Baby's Penis And Gives Him Herpes
- Thread starter Skwim
- Start date
made the search in 150.000 posts easy, just 12 left
Sequence is very clear: Revolting, Revoltinger to Revoltingest
But why the word Revolting...
There are many things in society & government to revolt against.Revolting Revoltinger Revoltingest
made the search in 150.000 posts easy, just 12 left
Sequence is very clear: Revolting, Revoltinger to Revoltingest
But why the word Revolting...
Duke_Leto
Active Member
That’s very bizarre to me. My family must be different: I can’t imagine any circumstance in which I’d discuss cutting the genitalia of my son with my immediate family, let alone my in-laws.
stvdv
Veteran Member: I Share (not Debate) my POV
Aha, I agree. Now I get the picture loud and clear. And those things are the opposite of Bokononsm
Sad thing is that there is not even much we can do against this. As the very rich dominate the world anyway
The very rich don't impede me.
We're not big on seeing ourselves as victims.
stvdv
Veteran Member: I Share (not Debate) my POV
And still "Revoltingest"?
No reason to change.
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
How religious, conservative, traditional, etc. is your family? Of course grandmothers will concern themselves with details and even change a few diapers themselves.
But yes, of course it's bizarre for those whom circumcision isn't a common custom.
Last edited:
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
Care to give an example?
Epic Beard Man
Bearded Philosopher
I agree. But topics on a child's consent is irrelevant considering that they don't have much to consent to, nor understand the concept of consent, nor have the physical capacity to consent or not to consent. A child in a parents household does not have any autonomy any more than a baby being born.
Epic Beard Man
Bearded Philosopher
Correction, your right, the mouth is used to suction the blood at the circumcision site.
"The majority of Jewish circumcision ceremonies do not include metzitzah b’peh, in which the mohel, or circumciser, places their mouth directly on the wound to suck away the blood."
Source
Still, from my medical perspective its an unsanitary practice not to mention culturally I wouldn't want any person putting their mouth near or around or on the genitalia of my child.
Last edited:
rosends
Well-Known Member
Your medical perspective and that of others' seem to be at odds, and the cultural taboo exists when you look at the act in any way other than medical. If I am planning to have a colonoscopy, someone might say "culturally, I wouldn't want any person putting any part of their body, or any device up my rectum."
Tumah
Veteran Member
No, as far as I know, we all do it.
Tumah
Veteran Member
According to what I found, in 2013 (I couldn't find anything more recent), 0.049% of circumcisions in Israel, were evacuated to the hospital, mostly for non-serious complications that could otherwise have been able to be dealt with outside the hospital.
Also according to what I found, 1.37% of the US population is seriously injured in a car accident every year.
I kind of feel like we should be seeing more posts against driving, than circumcisions.
Also according to what I found, 1.37% of the US population is seriously injured in a car accident every year.
I kind of feel like we should be seeing more posts against driving, than circumcisions.
Driving is necessary, circumcisions are not
Tumah
Veteran Member
Are your legs broken or are they more important to you than seriously injuring your fellow human?
Australia is a large country, I can’t walk 800km to see my mother and father
Tumah
Veteran Member
Then you either shouldn't have moved so far away from them if it was that important to you to see them or come to terms with not being able to see them so often. Or buy a camel if you have weak legs.
Tell the Israeli defence force to sell all their vehicles and take up camels instead.
I didn’t run away from my parents. They ran away from me.
I don’t have long enough vacations to make the trip by camel. Camels simply do not go at 110km/h
Epic Beard Man
Bearded Philosopher
Not necessarily. Medically, it's unsanitary for any human being who could potentially be a carrier of some foreign born bacteria/virus to place their lips on wound/laceration. As we see per OP article, said patient had a reaction. We take the same approach when performing BLS which is why you don't need to give mouth to mouth when performing chest compression. Culturally it's taboo because its nasty and uncommon especially when a grown make is suckling the site near, on, or around the child's genitalia. As you did the comparison with colonoscopy, it is commonly accepted considering it's something that is necessary to detect cancer and polyps. Considering our medical advancements, suckling a wound site is unnecessary and unsanitary and should be admonished.