• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Computational Religious Analysis

Milton Platt

Well-Known Member
Supreme means better than all others and semantically excludes multiple beings. You could have multiple awesome beings but not multiple supreme beings.

I don't disagree with your point, because 1 is zero relative to 2.
Supremes.jpg
 

bobhikes

Nondetermined
Premium Member
Could be.
Or perhaps they'd be above such things.

just had an insight into 1 God or mutigods based on judgement. If I create something I am a harsh judge of it wanting it to be perfect but if I work with a team I am more flexible and if I work in a pair say with children I compete with my partner for its value. That being said how do you view god and his creation harsh, flexible or competitive. That should help with the number if gods.
 

stvdv

Veteran Member: I Share (not Debate) my POV
Of all the numbers of gods, many select a particular quantity.
Zero....I understand. It's fundamentally different from other numbers.
The common choice: Why believe there is a single supreme being?
(Please show your calculations.)
Why couldn't there be a whole gaggle of supreme beings?
God is human invented concept for the Great Unknown Mystery

God as Invented by human mind = Unreal

If you want the truth:
God = Human concept = not Truth = 0

(Great Unknown Mystery remains)
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
I disagree.
My statement adds together all views....
(No gods) + (All sets of imaginary gods)

And mine takes yours and improves it by multiplying by zero which always gives the correct answer to the number of gods.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
And mine takes yours and improves it by multiplying by zero which always gives the correct answer to the number of gods.
Your statement gives a result of 0.
But we know that there are many imaginary gods, so your answer is wrong.
0 + ni is more accurate because the number of gods is a complex number.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Your statement gives a result of 0.
But we know that there are many imaginary gods, so your answer is wrong.
0 + ni is more accurate because the number of gods is a complex number.

Good morning


Ahh, imagination is not reality so even billions of imaginary gods still equates to zero real gods

Trust me, i have spent my working life manipulating operator j for government, military and industry around the world.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Good morning


Ahh, imagination is not reality so even billions of imaginary gods still equates to zero real gods

Trust me, i have spent my working life manipulating operator j for government, military and industry around the world.
Our reality includes recognition that gods are imaginary.
They're well represented by the square root of -1.
 

Darkforbid

Well-Known Member
Yep, atheistic logic. Over 90% of matter in the observable universe is dark and un reactive with normal matter, yet atheist claim its lifeless with absolutely nothing to back up such claims
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Yep, atheistic logic. Over 90% of matter in the observable universe is dark and un reactive with normal matter, yet atheist claim its lifeless with absolutely nothing to back up such claims

You know nothing about atheism, astronomy or cosmology so why pretend?

Atheism :: disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.

Nothing more, nothing less?

You are confusing atheism with science, a common mistake of the deliberately ignorant
 
Top