Jeff Taylor... I truly wonder how such a person has an audience at all.Jeff has the answer -
Jeff Taylor
Published on 11 Sep 2019
I say keep parliament locked down as the Queen herself instructed, on the advice of the Privy Council. The Scottish Court of Sessions has today ruled that the prorogation of parliament was unlawful and therefore null and void because it says that Boris Johnson misled the Queen when advising her to put out the order. A statement on the ruling from the court said: "All three First Division judges have decided that the PM's advice to HM the Queen is justiciable, that it was motivated by the improper purpose of stymying Parliament and that it, and what followed from it, is unlawful." And finished the statement saying: "The Court will accordingly make an Order declaring that the Prime Minister's advice to HM the Queen and the prorogation which followed thereon was unlawful and is thus null and of no effect." Now, having read then entire two page document from the Court of Session, they do not appear to have cited any statute or other law to back this up nor any case law either. Now the full judgment is due out by Friday, I think, so maybe we'll have more of an idea then on what they are basing this on. I also saw on the BBC that an order hasn't been issued and with the UK Supreme Court due to deliberate this prorogation next Tuesday, then it might be a bit premature so to do. But this hasn't stopped the Remainer politicians all converging on Westminster to try and throw open the doors and renew their stop Brexit antics as well as demand that Boris instantly fall on his sword for breaking the rules - when that's all that Remainers have been doing for over three years, the hypocrisy is staggering. Anyway, we should definitely wait until the Supreme Court makes a decision. Because what would happen if the Remainers took over Parliament again and passed a law in a few days like they did last time, only to find that the Supreme Court reverses the Scottish judges' decision? Then we'd be in an even deeper constitutional mire. Anyway, I'm not sure that the judges have seen a transcript of the actual Privy Council meeting that took place in Balmoral, where the one notable absentee was the Prime Minister, Boris Johnson. Maybe the three members of the Privy Council that attended, who were the Leader of the House of Lords, the Chief Whip and Jacob Rees-Mogg, merely advised her to prorogue parliament between two sets of dates? I don't know. If that's all that happened then what's the beef? Anyway, the Queen may be venerable in her years, but she does have loads of experience in these matters. She is also surrounded by advisers as well as a top notch team of unnamed lawyers. She also reads the papers and watches the news. So I reckon she made her decision with all that in mind. Our parliamentarians may live in a Westminster bubble, but I've heard from many sources over the years that Her Majesty is meticulous when going about her Royal duties. And, at the end of the day it is her decision, and she is not personally answerable to the courts. And I think the only way for the Remainers to properly take their seats, is if the Queen is advised by the right people to recall parliament. I must admit, if I were her I'd be tempted to get the carriage and footmen out, ride down the road to Westminster and double down personally on the prorogation, just to make the Royal point! But I doubt she's anywhere near as petty minded as me. But at the end of the day, the general thinking is that this Court of Sessions decision will be reversed next week by the Supreme Court. But I remind you - this is Brexit we're talking about!
We will learn the exact reasoning of the three Scottish judges tomorrow. And the Supreme Court of the UK will make its decision next tuesday, from what I have learned.
That will give us the exact measure of the shame that Boris Johnson is inflicting upon itself and of the damage that the Conservative Party and the Leavers are inflicting upon the UK.
Jeff Taylor's passion won't change that.
Did you talk about Quislings recently? That is an interesting word to consider, after all...
It is probably time to consider how long Scotland is likely to keep suffering this bother that membership in the UK has become.
And if Scotland secedes, can North Ireland be far behind? Particularly given how attractive a place it will become for the business that want the security that Brexit aims to destroy?