• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Contradictions in the Bible

Dan From Smithville

What we've got here is failure to communicate.
Staff member
Premium Member
There are plenty of contradictions that found in the Bible that I have no answer for. This is not one. Go find one of those if it makes you feel better.

Good-Ole-Rebel
Do you have anything valid to respond to him with or just this wave of the hands hocus pocus?
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I already showed you. Go back and reread. Or read.

Good-Ole-Rebel
Nope, you only demonstrated that you could not understand the Bible.

Tell my, why don't your properly support your claims?

Here is the entirety of your post #44:

"Two different Ahaziah's. Note their different deaths. (2 Kings 9:27-28) (2 Chron. 22:7-9)

And two different Athaliah's. Note (2 Chron. 22:2) "His mothers name also was Athaliah...."

Good-Ole-Rebel"

Please note, a vague reference to verses that you do not understand proves nothing. You need to do your homework if you want to claim to have refuted someone.
 

Dan From Smithville

What we've got here is failure to communicate.
Staff member
Premium Member
LOL! You keep calling God a liar. A poor excuse for lying still makes one a liar when one lies.

So I guess it is okay if people send fake evidence to your wife that you cheated on her. After all it is not lying.
It is the strangest Christian belief I may ever have run across.
 

Good-Ole-Rebel

Well-Known Member
Nope, you only demonstrated that you could not understand the Bible.

Tell my, why don't your properly support your claims?

Here is the entirety of your post #44:

"Two different Ahaziah's. Note their different deaths. (2 Kings 9:27-28) (2 Chron. 22:7-9)

And two different Athaliah's. Note (2 Chron. 22:2) "His mothers name also was Athaliah...."

Good-Ole-Rebel"

Please note, a vague reference to verses that you do not understand proves nothing. You need to do your homework if you want to claim to have refuted someone.

Well, that shows you that you have two different peoples.

Good-Ole-Rebel
 

Dan From Smithville

What we've got here is failure to communicate.
Staff member
Premium Member
There are plenty of contradictions that found in the Bible that I have no answer for. This is not one. Go find one of those if it makes you feel better.

Good-Ole-Rebel
The evidence @Skwim presented is very robust. Based on that evidence, any reasonable person would conclude that it is the same people being mentioned at different points in the Bible. If you disagree, you are going to have to do better than wave it off with meaningless shots over the shoulder in retreat.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Infallible in the original but nobody knows what they said.

If there even ever were "originals" for oral traditions.

Does your pretty good idea include whether noahs ark
is true? World wide flood and all?

Of course whether it is all true is arguable.

Whether Batboy has a secret moon base is arguable,
though not among sensible people.
Boy are you going to be embarrassed. They found Noah's Ark and there is no mention of a Moon base:

images
 

Dan From Smithville

What we've got here is failure to communicate.
Staff member
Premium Member
No you can't. You already proved that by ignoring verses.

Good-Old-Rebel
I see you treat questions that you do not understand much like the contradictions that you do not understand. You ignore them.

How have you supported your claims? How are they two different people?
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
There are plenty of contradictions that found in the Bible that I have no answer for. This is not one.
And obviously your answer here is way out in left field. Thing is, just because you have an answer doesn't mean it has any merit, and this is one of those times. Sorry that your attempt here to defend your Bible has been a failure, but that's the way it often goes. :D But you can take heart in the fact that you've got a lot of company.


Go find one of those if it makes you feel better.
Nah, we've got you pretty well figured out.

excuses.png

.
 
Last edited:

Workman

UNIQUE
And all that takes for [THEM] to have belief is from..THE HEART!
Unlike for SOME!..in need of company..do NOT have the HEART!
 
Last edited:

Workman

UNIQUE
BE ALL READY THEN WILL I APPROACH YOU...FOR I THAN WILL MAKEN EXAMPLE OUT ALL READY OF YOU.

THAN ALL SHALL SEE!..FROM WHICH BE TRUE!..WILL BE IN FRONT!..BEING RIGHT OF YOU!..
 
Last edited:

Katzpur

Not your average Mormon
Now that does not seem to make any sense at all. I love the post his rationalization. It is okay to make fun of the stones he used for translation but not the hat.
Personally, I don't believe it's okay to make fun of other people's beliefs, period. I just think it's juvenile, tactless and mean. For those of you who don't share my standard of civility, I would at least expect you to actually ridicule what we do believe and not what we don't believe.

You do realize that that story has scam written all over it I hope.
I realize that's your opinion. Do you realize that there is probably not a Mormon alive who gives a damn what you think? I'm sure you think Christianity as a whole has "scam" written all over it, too. Or maybe you believe that a man walking on water is more believable than a man who uses seer stones to translate an ancient document. I'm sorry, but I just don't get the rationale behind where you draw the line.
 
Last edited:
Top