-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Socialist AOC can't stand it when straight people want a pride parade of their own.
- Thread starter Twilight Hue
- Start date
Shad
Veteran Member
You didn't fact check this did you?
Scott Paul Beierle's attack was directed at woman not race.
Jeremy Shaw killed to steal property
Demetrius Alexander Brown is black and killed someone over a car sale involving fraud
Richard Starry killed his family and himself. No WS motive established.
James Mathis killed his own kid....
Joshua Daniel Miller was anti-gov which is not the same as WS. Anti-gov isn't only a right-wing view. He attacked his wife and her b/f...
This is hilarious considering what I posted above while only being on page 2 of the false report from ADL
Malachi Qaadir Dorns killed his family after an argument.
Roger Melvin Tackett killed an acquaintance after a dispute.
Travis Reinking shot up the place of his previous employment after being terminated.
Who is lying to who now?
Last edited:
Shad
Veteran Member
That is provided your source is honest which it isn't.
As your claims are easy to refute and false as you didn't watch what you linked. He is mocking the left and it's labeling. He is mocking their purity culture. A person can be nice, manners, while holding bad ideas. After all he commented on manners and conduct towards him not the ideology they hold. He pointed out people, the supporters, attack him for race mixing. You just echo purity culture blindly.
Last edited:
Shad
Veteran Member
Within context of how they treated him. Again you didn't watch the video.
Nope. Watch the video and try again.
Definition of manners | Dictionary.com
Again you just do not know what manners are and follow purity culture of the left. Someone can be nice but hold an idea I object to. For example most Muslims are probably nice. However Islam is pretty dumb in my view. Most religions are in my view.
What difference does that make? I am sure a white supremacist would be nice to me (I am white, downright pasty actually). But that does not mean they are good people, and I would never call one a friend.
When I used to work retail there was a gentleman who always came through my checkout. He was very polite and seemed very sweet. Or at least like he had old fashioned manners. He stopped coming through for about 7 or 8 months or so.
I asked him about it and he seemed super sheepish about it. He said he was in jail for a “hate crime” in massive air quotes. I didn’t prove but he casually said something about the “filthy Jewry”
Apparently he was a member of the KKK
ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
Um, no. Martin Luther King explicitly spoke out against stirring up violence and was adamant about protest being peaceful. On the other hand, the far-right groups that are involved in organizing these rallies often do so with the expressed intention of stirring up violence.
Last edited:
ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
Uh huh.
1) The Daily Wire is a far-right propaganda site run by brazen, unapologetic idiot and corporate tool Ben Shapiro.
2) Bringing up a list of Antifa violence while ignoring violence committed by all other groups isn't evidence that Antifa are MORE violence than any other group. This should be obvious.
Wandering Monk
Well-Known Member
He knew his presence would provoke violence. He marched anyway. This is the same thing straight pride marchers are doing. Same as wearing a MAGA hat in public.
ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
He knew his presence would provoke violence, but that doesn't mean provoking violence was actually their intent. They provoked violence by sitting quietly and peacefully, knowing that they would be assailed by racists. What the far right are engaged in is straight-up provocation to violence. They are not sitting peacefully and passively while violence is inflicted on them - they invite the violence through deliberate provocation.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
They've been fed so much propaganda that they feel they are as much a victim today as much as the actual victims were in the past.
I see all this as a stick it to "whitey" campaign using the existing remenets of hate groups that are still out there as an excuse to try to convince the world that they are still repressed in spite of all the progressive changes made already.
Regardless of their "affiliation" with the right, they weren't the only place reporting the news. Secondly, it's not a a > b scenario -- being a violent retard transcends your affiliation with either side of the political spectrum though it is part of the identifying characteristics of these individuals. Discrediting the information because of who it's from is a logical fallacy called a genetic fallacy.
Anyway, if you'd like your truth about antifa hi-jinx you won't find it on leftist media because typically they won't report it. The only reason I used that link is because it was one of the few that summarized the information comprehensively and it was not the only source out there.
ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
I'm sure. But Antifa also have a lot of false narratives spread about them:
You searched for antifa | Snopes.com
Antifa members are responsible for violence, and often their tactics are reprehensible, but to claim that they are MORE violent than any other right-wing group is not true, and claiming that they are the MOST violent group is just blatantly false. The extreme right are interested in spreading fear-mongering about them, and a lot of people fall for it.
I'm not saying Antifa can't be dangerous. When I saw that College Professor hit a guy in the head with a bike lock I was as disgusted as anyone. But the point is not to get hysterical by swallowing the numerous falsehoods spread about them and blow the threat posed by Antifa way out of proportion, while ignoring the far more numerous accounts of right-wing terrorism and violence.
The point is that extreme right-wing groups are, both historically and currently, far more violent and dangerous than groups like Antifa, contrary to what a lot of people have been saying.
Nope, because I don't discredit it because of Ben Shapiro just as a person. I discredit him as a source because of his history of false statements, outright lies and right-wing fear mongering. He is demonstrably not a reliable source.Discrediting the information because of who it's from is a logical fallacy called a genetic fallacy.
Speaking about the truth regarding Antifa, when are you going to give me an example of this ever actually occuring:
"A skinhead might punch you in the mouth but at least it'll be done to your face - antifa will distract you with someone and then 2-3 of them will sneak up from behind and shank you. Not exactly the same thing."
Epic Beard Man
Bearded Philosopher
Right-wing extremist terror attacks: A timeline | DW | 15.03.2019
The timeline is a span of ten years now since you just brought Antifa what has Antifa done from 1960 in Europe that is comparable to white nationalist terrorist among the far right?
Shad
Veteran Member
It is called context.
You have changed what he said to what you want him to say by removing the context. He never said friend, he said those he knows.
averageJOE
zombie
Straight Pride parade organizers John Hugo and Sampson Racioppi holding the "Straight Pride Flag".
You would think that for this picture, they would have had, I don't know, a man and woman holding this flag??? Instead of two men...making the picture look...kinda gay...
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
Wow, they look super pumped and excited about their parade!
Straight Pride parade organizers John Hugo and Sampson Racioppi holding the "Straight Pride Flag".
You would think that for this picture, they would have had, I don't know, a man and woman holding this flag??? Instead of two men...making the picture look...kinda gay...