• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

"Harry Potter Books Banned from Catholic School Since They Have 'Actual Curses' ”

Skwim

Veteran Member
.

"A Catholic school in Tennessee has banned all Harry Potter books from the library because they apparently promote witchcraft. This is an argument they’re still making more than a decade after the last book was published. The decision was made after Reverend Dan Reehill confirmed the theory with Vatican exorcists:


Harry-Potter-books-banned-at-US-school-after-pastor-claims-696x464.jpg


In an email to parents at St. Edward Catholic School in Nashville, Reehill attempted to explain his thinking. Which is generous way to describe what he wrote.

“These books present magic as both good and evil, which is not true, but in fact a clever deception. The curses and spells used in the books are actual curses and spells; which when read by a human being risk conjuring evil spirits into the presence of the person reading the text,” the Reverend Reehill wrote, apparently in all seriousness.

Rebecca Hammel, the superintendent of schools for the Catholic Diocese of Nashville, told The Tennessean that the Reverend Reehill had indeed sent the email and has the final say on the matter, since the Catholic Church does not have an official position on Ms Rowling’s best-selling series.

“Each pastor has canonical authority to make such decisions for his parish school,” she said. “He’s well within his authority to act in that manner.”

Reehill may have been within his authority, but the idea that saying “Avada Kedavra” carries the same weight when we say it as in the book is ridiculous. (There are actual evils in this country without having to create your own.)

Interestingly enough, the Harry Potter series is rife with themes that Christians could appreciate, such as the importance of self-sacrifice for loved ones. The main characters are constantly fighting those who aim to harm others. But Reehill doesn’t want students to figure that out for themselves.

Kids are smarter than he seems to give them credit for. When an adult wants to ban a book, it’s probably because there’s something really interesting about it worth checking out. Reehill’s move could ultimately backfire. So I guess he would be teaching students a lesson… albeit indirectly.

Thought if the reverend wants to be consistent, then he should also ban the Narnia series, which also contain magic. Wouldn’t want to be a hypocrite, would we?
source

Does anyone even read the books anymore?


.
 
Last edited:

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
The curses and spells used in the books are actual curses and spells;

Look at the babbling of the current President and tell me that it's just him. Someone clearly has cast spells on him. And we know who - it was Putin that did it to tear America apart.

So we really need a spell casting branch of the military to fight wars where spells are the ammo of choice.

You think there might be a good movie here?
 

Altfish

Veteran Member
These people must believe that their religious belief are so fragile that an author of fiction can frighten them.
All banning will do to the kids is make them curious,hopefully curious enough to dig out the books and read them for what they are. Damn good stories.
 

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
Oof, let’s do the time warp again.

Lmao! The curses are random words from the ancient languages that tangentially tie into whatever effect the spells are supposed to do. Magic is not real. You can’t really fly.

Also in response to the, frankly offensive, question of reading the books still.
Any Potterhead worth their salt will answer
Always.
 
Last edited:

Ponder This

Well-Known Member
.

"A Catholic school in Tennessee has banned all Harry Potter books from the library because they apparently promote witchcraft. This is an argument they’re still making more than a decade after the last book was published. The decision was made after Reverend Dan Reehill confirmed the theory with Vatican exorcists:


Harry-Potter-books-banned-at-US-school-after-pastor-claims-696x464.jpg
In an email to parents at St. Edward Catholic School in Nashville, Reehill attempted to explain his thinking. Which is generous way to describe what he wrote.

“These books present magic as both good and evil, which is not true, but in fact a clever deception. The curses and spells used in the books are actual curses and spells; which when read by a human being risk conjuring evil spirits into the presence of the person reading the text,” the Reverend Reehill wrote, apparently in all seriousness.

Rebecca Hammel, the superintendent of schools for the Catholic Diocese of Nashville, told The Tennessean that the Reverend Reehill had indeed sent the email and has the final say on the matter, since the Catholic Church does not have an official position on Ms Rowling’s best-selling series.

“Each pastor has canonical authority to make such decisions for his parish school,” she said. “He’s well within his authority to act in that manner.”

Reehill may have been within his authority, but the idea that saying “Avada Kedavra” carries the same weight when we say it as in the book is ridiculous. (There are actual evils in this country without having to create your own.)

Interestingly enough, the Harry Potter series is rife with themes that Christians could appreciate, such as the importance of self-sacrifice for loved ones. The main characters are constantly fighting those who aim to harm others. But Reehill doesn’t want students to figure that out for themselves.

Kids are smarter than he seems to give them credit for. When an adult wants to ban a book, it’s probably because there’s something really interesting about it worth checking out. Reehill’s move could ultimately backfire. So I guess he would be teaching students a lesson… albeit indirectly.

Thought if the reverend wants to be consistent, then he should also ban the Narnia series, which also contain magic. Wouldn’t want to be a hypocrite, would we?
source
Does anyone even read the books anymore?


.

Jesus curses a fig tree... So I guess they need to ban the New Testament. Gotta be consistent, right?
 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
Jesus curses a fig tree... So I guess they need to ban the New Testament. Gotta be consistent, right?
I had to look this one up, and the passage itself is genuinely quite unsettling for a few reasons:

Mark 11:12–14 and 11:20–25 (NIV):
"The next day as they were leaving Bethany, Jesus was hungry. Seeing in the distance a fig tree in leaf, he went to find out if it had any fruit. When he reached it, he found nothing but leaves, because it was not the season for figs. Then he said to the tree, "May no one ever eat fruit from you again". And his disciples heard him say it.
...
"In the morning, as they went along, they saw the fig tree withered from the roots. Peter remembered and said to Jesus, "Rabbi, look! The fig tree you cursed has withered!" "Have faith in God," Jesus answered. "Truly I tell you, if anyone says to this mountain, 'Go, throw yourself into the sea,' and does not doubt in their heart but believes that what they say will happen, it will be done for them. Therefore I tell you, whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours. And when you stand praying, if you hold anything against anyone, forgive them, so that your Father in heaven may forgive you your sins."

Matthew 21:18–22 (NIV):
Early in the morning, as Jesus was on his way back to the city, he was hungry. Seeing a fig tree by the road, he went up to it but found nothing on it except leaves. Then he said to it, "May you never bear fruit again!" Immediately the tree withered. When the disciples saw this, they were amazed. "How did the fig tree wither so quickly?" they asked. Jesus replied, "Truly I tell you, if you have faith and do not doubt, not only can you do what was done to the fig tree, but also you can say to this mountain, ‘Go, throw yourself into the sea,’ and it will be done. If you believe, you will receive whatever you ask for in prayer."


So, if I've got this straight, the story is basically "Jesus wanted some fruit from a tree, but because it wasn't seasonal, he killed the tree like a petulant child, then instructed his followers that you can use the power of belief to literally achieve anything, including killing stuff and toppling mountains"...

...

That brings up a lot of questions. One among them being "why didn't Jesus just believe the tree to be fruitful?"
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I'm still amazed that they believe witchcraft, evil spirits, exorcisms, demons, & magic really exist.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
I'm still amazed that they believe witchcraft, evil spirits, exorcisms, demons, & magic really exist.

Catechism of the Catholic Church - The first commandment

Divination and magic

2115 God can reveal the future to his prophets or to other saints. Still, a sound Christian attitude consists in putting oneself confidently into the hands of Providence for whatever concerns the future, and giving up all unhealthy curiosity about it. Improvidence, however, can constitute a lack of responsibility.

2116 All forms of divination are to be rejected: recourse to Satan or demons, conjuring up the dead or other practices falsely supposed to "unveil" the future.48 Consulting horoscopes, astrology, palm reading, interpretation of omens and lots, the phenomena of clairvoyance, and recourse to mediums all conceal a desire for power over time, history, and, in the last analysis, other human beings, as well as a wish to conciliate hidden powers. They contradict the honor, respect, and loving fear that we owe to God alone.

2117 All practices of magic or sorcery, by which one attempts to tame occult powers, so as to place them at one's service and have a supernatural power over others - even if this were for the sake of restoring their health - are gravely contrary to the virtue of religion. These practices are even more to be condemned when accompanied by the intention of harming someone, or when they have recourse to the intervention of demons. Wearing charms is also reprehensible. Spiritism often implies divination or magical practices; the Church for her part warns the faithful against it. Recourse to so-called traditional cures does not justify either the invocation of evil powers or the exploitation of another's credulity.
 

Wandering Monk

Well-Known Member
.

"A Catholic school in Tennessee has banned all Harry Potter books from the library because they apparently promote witchcraft. This is an argument they’re still making more than a decade after the last book was published. The decision was made after Reverend Dan Reehill confirmed the theory with Vatican exorcists:


Harry-Potter-books-banned-at-US-school-after-pastor-claims-696x464.jpg
In an email to parents at St. Edward Catholic School in Nashville, Reehill attempted to explain his thinking. Which is generous way to describe what he wrote.

“These books present magic as both good and evil, which is not true, but in fact a clever deception. The curses and spells used in the books are actual curses and spells; which when read by a human being risk conjuring evil spirits into the presence of the person reading the text,” the Reverend Reehill wrote, apparently in all seriousness.

Rebecca Hammel, the superintendent of schools for the Catholic Diocese of Nashville, told The Tennessean that the Reverend Reehill had indeed sent the email and has the final say on the matter, since the Catholic Church does not have an official position on Ms Rowling’s best-selling series.

“Each pastor has canonical authority to make such decisions for his parish school,” she said. “He’s well within his authority to act in that manner.”

Reehill may have been within his authority, but the idea that saying “Avada Kedavra” carries the same weight when we say it as in the book is ridiculous. (There are actual evils in this country without having to create your own.)

Interestingly enough, the Harry Potter series is rife with themes that Christians could appreciate, such as the importance of self-sacrifice for loved ones. The main characters are constantly fighting those who aim to harm others. But Reehill doesn’t want students to figure that out for themselves.

Kids are smarter than he seems to give them credit for. When an adult wants to ban a book, it’s probably because there’s something really interesting about it worth checking out. Reehill’s move could ultimately backfire. So I guess he would be teaching students a lesson… albeit indirectly.

Thought if the reverend wants to be consistent, then he should also ban the Narnia series, which also contain magic. Wouldn’t want to be a hypocrite, would we?
source
Does anyone even read the books anymore?


.

This is what you get when you succumb to magical thinking as all religions do.
 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
That's too bad.

I'm not big on movies, but the books are delightful.
Childlike, but not childish.
Tom
I actually prefer the movies to the books. I personally thought the books weren't especially well plotted or written, and found them kind of dull once I hit my later teens.

Then again, I'm a curmudgeonly writer type who harps on about story structure and hero's journeys, so take that with a grain of salt.
 
Top