• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

God and homosexuality.

viole

Ontological Naturalist
Premium Member
This between your consciousness and God only, I have now answer on this, just my opinion I already stated

You have no answer to this, but you have an answer for male homosexuality?

How did you come to it? Can you be a bit more precise? I ask because I would like to use the same channels. If they are reliable. Are they?

Ciao

- viole
 

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
But I can't.
Religionists won't let God get a word in edgewise because they are always telling me what God really means.
Tom

Indeed, this is quite true. I do find it quite Interesting with an I? That "What God Wants", 100% of the time, coincides with what these "Speakers For God Want"...

Isn't that convenient?
 

firedragon

Veteran Member
Why God did not like it ? I give you an example that basically explains the reason, imo.

Study looks at HIV infections in Middle East and North Africa

Research on the number of HIV infected people are no good to justify negative sanctions on homosexuality I believe. I am no expert on this subject I am just voicing my thought.

What if they were allowed to be free in expressing their sexuality and were taught to use all kinds of protection, be mature in their decisions, etc? What will be the change? Has anyone tried this and then done a research to compare numbers?

The problem with using this kind of research to justify "what God would have thought" is in my opinion completely useless. Because there should be research done under different scenarios, with different conditions etc. Qualitative research should be done to understand the real reasons, thoughts etc and then a quantitative study should be formulated on the hypothesis created by the qualitative study.

Its very important to do that and compare date to come to conclusions like that. Otherwise, its pure bias assumption.

Again, I am no expert in this and I am a theist. I am only speaking my opinion. And I will be glad to study research if anyone is kind enough to point to some.

Peace.
 

leov

Well-Known Member
Research on the number of HIV infected people are no good to justify negative sanctions on homosexuality I believe. I am no expert on this subject I am just voicing my thought.

What if they were allowed to be free in expressing their sexuality and were taught to use all kinds of protection, be mature in their decisions, etc? What will be the change? Has anyone tried this and then done a research to compare numbers?

The problem with using this kind of research to justify "what God would have thought" is in my opinion completely useless. Because there should be research done under different scenarios, with different conditions etc. Qualitative research should be done to understand the real reasons, thoughts etc and then a quantitative study should be formulated on the hypothesis created by the qualitative study.

Its very important to do that and compare date to come to conclusions like that. Otherwise, its pure bias assumption.

Again, I am no expert in this and I am a theist. I am only speaking my opinion. And I will be glad to study research if anyone is kind enough to point to some.

Peace.
It was not my point, friend. I used HIV just as an example of gay related problem to illustrate point I was making, if you noticed I posted other examples too.
 

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
It was not my point, friend. I used HIV just as an example of gay related problem to illustrate point I was making, if you noticed I posted other examples too.
It’s not a gay related problem, it’s a promiscuity problem.
 

Saint Frankenstein

Wanderer From Afar
Premium Member
We do not know gay behavior 3000 years ago, but we can assume that gays had more or less similar gay related illnesses as today. It was a grave problem then.
You have no evidence for that. The prohibitions on homosexuality in the Bible probably had more to do with reinforcing patriarchal gender roles. The actual verses about it aren't very clear, anyway. But there's no reason to believe that it had anything to so with health issues.

As for shigella, that is a very rare infection in the developed world but is a common cause of diarrhea in developing countries. It's probably more common in the tropics. It wasn't discovered until the 19th century. It doesn't really have anything to do with homosexuality.
 

leov

Well-Known Member
You have no evidence for that. The prohibitions on homosexuality in the Bible probably had more to do with reinforcing patriarchal gender roles. The actual verses about it aren't very clear, anyway. But there's no reason to believe that it had anything to so with health issues.

As for shigella, that is a very rare infection in the developed world but is a common cause of diarrhea in developing countries. It's probably more common in the tropics. It wasn't discovered until the 19th century. It doesn't really have anything to do with homosexuality.
Sperm contains dad's lifestyle information alongside basic genetic material | Genetic Literacy Project
This and what I posted in OP.
 

Brickjectivity

wind and rain touch not this brain
Staff member
Premium Member
It all fits what Nachmanides said about gates of understanding of the Bible. I agree with Philo. Imo, 'Israel' implies clairvoyance of Abraham not only physical descent from Jacob. Clairvoyance, genetic ability of Abraham is what God wanted to genetically preserve.
Philo takes license with all kinds of things in History, but he can't change the translation of the word israel. Its simply out of his hands. He has something to say about everything, but that doesn't make him a go to person on Judaism. Anyways if anyone has carefully bred genes its the Chinese not the Jews. Chinese people have been carefully focused on genetic breeding for millennia. Jewish people have not at all and believe in mixing; and look at all of the ethnic foods, music and behaviors they have collected over the centuries. Jewish people are of all kinds of shapes and colors, and genetically they are like a wild wood.
 
Top