• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Go to trump rally or don't get paid

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Hardly. Liberals support speech laws which are not person nor social freedoms but repression of both. After all only 1 nation has free speech and it isn't a liberal bastion. Seems like you never bother to actually look around at which side supports which policy.
So wrong it hurts: Freedom of speech by country - Wikipedia
Also, by your "logic" those snowflakes who want to ban flag burning or kneeling during the anthem because it hurts their fee-fees are liberals, right?
Btw, I along with many other liberals I don't support censorship or criminalizing "hate speech". Nice strawman, though.

All religions not merely those that a person dislikes. Try again.
An odd way to define theocracy. Try again.

Opium of the masses. Heard that saying?
Of course, but that hardly makes it exclusively a left thing.
 

Kangaroo Feathers

Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
So hard core patriots and nationalists who are "country first", are actually left-wing?



Christian fundamentalists oppose religions that aren't their own...so they too must be left-wing?
It's the standard redefine commonly understood terms until they support your preferred reality play. What are you, new?
 

Shad

Veteran Member

Now go look up hate speech laws son and try again. No one in the US can be fined for teaching a dog a nazi salute yet in the UK.... Yawn You didn't read what you link. Try again son.

Censorship in the United Kingdom - Wikipedia


Also, by your "logic" those snowflakes who want to ban flag burning or kneeling during the anthem because it hurts their fee-fees are liberals, right?

Nope.

Btw, I along with many other liberals I don't support censorship or criminalizing "hate speech". Nice strawman, though.

It is still a left-wing policy. It is good you do not support the more radical elements of your group



An odd way to define theocracy. Try again.

The strawman was your own as you conflated anti-theism with selective theism. Try again son.


Of course, but that hardly makes it exclusively a left thing.

The saying was from communist founders. Try again.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
You are attempting to draw a parallel by using selective samples while ignore far greater examples which separate the two even more.

It was you who first tried to connect the soviet union with liberal progressives, which again is a ridiculous straw man. It's about as dumb as calling someone even slightly right of center a "fascist/nazi"; it's useless hyperbole.
 

Kangaroo Feathers

Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
So wrong it hurts: Freedom of speech by country - Wikipedia
Also, by your "logic" those snowflakes who want to ban flag burning or kneeling during the anthem because it hurts their fee-fees are liberals, right?
Btw, I along with many other liberals I don't support censorship or criminalizing "hate speech". Nice strawman, though.
Freedom of speech only applies to speech they personally approve of. Attacking antifascists with hammers and driving through protesters with vehicles, then pepper spraying the survivors: protected, Kneeling during certain quasi-religious nationalistic ceremonies and burning the magic nationalism cloth: not protected. What are you, new?
 

Shad

Veteran Member
It was you who first tried to connect the soviet union with liberal progressives, which again is a ridiculous straw man. It's about as dumb as calling someone even slightly right of center a "fascist/nazi"; it's useless hyperbole.

No I connected it with left-wing. Try again son. Less fiction from your head and more responding to what I posted. Yawn.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
It's the standard redefine commonly understood terms until they support your preferred reality play. What are you, new?

It's like a little kid declaring that deserts are conservative (i.e. patriotic/godly) because they're yummy and that vegetables are liberal (i.e. socialist/communist/satan) because they're yucky.
Liberals are like cartoon villains who tie women to railroad tracks simply for evil's sake.
 

Kangaroo Feathers

Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
It was you who first tried to connect the soviet union with liberal progressives, which again is a ridiculous straw man. It's about as dumb as calling someone even slightly right of center a "fascist/nazi"; it's useless hyperbole.
Soooo... you're expecting internally consistent rigour, logic, and a modicum of self awareness? What are you, new?
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
No I connected it with left-wing. Try again son. Less fiction from your head and more responding to what I posted. Yawn.
And I connected it to the right as well. You can't pretend that the right is a bastion of religious equality and pluralism.
 

Shad

Veteran Member
It's like a little kid declaring that deserts are conservative (i.e. patriotic/godly) because it's yummy and that vegetables are liberal (i.e. socialist/communist/satan) because they're yucky.
Liberals are like cartoon villains who tie women to railroad tracks simply for evil's sake.


You keep changing the points I am addressing into whatever you want to. Try again son.
 

Shad

Veteran Member
Uh, yeah, no ****. I'm saying that religious oppression is hardly exclusively a communist thing.

Again anti-theism is not the same as selective theism. One goes after all religions while the other goes after different religions and/or sects but supports their own. Try again and get your terms right.
 
Top