• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Should Only Veterans Vote? (USA)

MikeDwight

Well-Known Member
Ya but what did that kind of voting produce? Look, suffrage, back to when they said demagoguery from black voting, felon voting, there hasn't been a vote in 200 years that discerned the Spirit of America over their own interests, as an officeholder, since the civil war, and that's why our parents 60's generation gets in the textbooks with the stupid beatniks and hippies and peaceman government, and JFK, and Just Imagine and beatles. its why we got star spangled banner is the new anthem, not Hail Columbia, its older ,its official, the Union used it, the confederates used Bonnie Blue flag on it. Every Voter every time just moves it around. Suffrage did that one. We get more and more holidays like MLK Jr and Reagan. We got people voting whatever.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
No.
This is not the world of Starship Troopers.
And in my experience, veterans are no wiser about
steering the country than are we draft dodgers.

The only voters should be atheistic, business owning,
expert shooting, males over 35....& with advanced
degrees in science....real science, not sociology.
Another Heinlein fan. There is something to be said for those that will put their lives on the line for their country, but that is really not the case for most in the military. The chances of them actually being at risk is very very low.
 

Ellen Brown

Well-Known Member
No.
This is not the world of Starship Troopers.
And in my experience, veterans are no wiser about
steering the country than are we draft dodgers.

The only voters should be atheistic, business owning,
expert shooting, males over 35....& with advanced
degrees in science....real science, not sociology.

That's being SEXIST. :)
 

Shad

Veteran Member
This will be like kicking a beehive and I understand. I'm just feeling like only those who have felt the cost of having our Country understand it.

Perhaps there is a broader classification? America is in a mess because of a Draft Dodger.

No to the OP title.

So you believe in the draft? You think it is fine for a government to forcible recruit people to fight the wars of politicians? Not merely wars of defense but regime changes, War on Terror, etc?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Another Heinlein fan. There is something to be said for those that will put their lives on the line for their country, but that is really not the case for most in the military. The chances of them actually being at risk is very very low.
Putting one's life on the line can have value in time of war.
But it doesn't make one wiser about governance.
Reward them with more money perhaps?
But not with automatic political power over others.
 

Kangaroo Feathers

Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
This will be like kicking a beehive and I understand. I'm just feeling like only those who have felt the cost of having our Country understand it.

Perhaps there is a broader classification? America is in a mess because of a Draft Dodger.
That was the theory Heinlein proposed in Starship Troopers. It has some merit, it does rather fail to take into account that veterans can be just as prone to biased or fallacious thinking as anyone else. Lotta veterans are Trumpettes, sadly, for example.
 
Last edited:

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
This will be like kicking a beehive and I understand. I'm just feeling like only those who have felt the cost of having our Country understand it.
Been reading Heinlein?

Perhaps there is a broader classification? America is in a mess because of a Draft Dodger.
That's pretty much the only thing Trump gets criticized for that I think is misplaced.

Conscription is slavery. It's heinous enough that I don't fault anyone for avoiding it however they have.

There are certainly equity issues with how it's easier for someone with wealth and means to avoid conscription than it is for average people, but the solution to this isn't to enslave people more equitably; the solution is to just not enslave people.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Putting one's life on the line can have value in time of war.
But it doesn't make one wiser about governance.
Reward them with more money perhaps?
But not with automatic political power over others.
Of course one must remember the set-up for Starship Troopers. A major breakdown of society had occurred and the only solution that they could figure out was earning the right to vote. And sometimes when I look at the people that are too lazy to vote, or vote without any real thought at all sometimes I wonder if there should not be a way to have to earn the franchise. Not anything as extreme as in that book, but earning the right to vote might make people value it more.

But since I cannot think of any cure that is not worse than what we have now I guess that the status quo will have to serve.
 

ADigitalArtist

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
US views wars as money making opportunities at the expense of human lives. We haven't had justified cause for involvement in decades. So why would I support becoming a military puppet to participate in the governing of this country?

I rather think US military should be having a much smaller budget and impact on the country than it is now.
 

Ellen Brown

Well-Known Member
That was the theory Heinlein proposed in Starship Troopers. It has some merit, it does rather fail to take into account that veterans can be just as prone to biased thinking as anyone else. Lotta veterans are Trumpettes, sadly, for example.

I rented "Starship Troopers" the other night and it was awful. Have I changed that much? I suppose so. Only watched it for about 15 minutes.

I wonder what sort of religious person would like Trump? I know that lots of Mormons did, and that was just one more reason to leave. How can a man that brags about mistreating women be elected President?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Of course one must remember the set-up for Starship Troopers. A major breakdown of society had occurred and the only solution that they could figure out was earning the right to vote. And sometimes when I look at the people that are too lazy to vote, or vote without any real thought at all sometimes I wonder if there should not be a way to have to earn the franchise. Not anything as extreme as in that book, but earning the right to vote might make people value it more.

But since I cannot think of any cure that is not worse than what we have now I guess that the status quo will have to serve.
I agree.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I rented "Starship Troopers" the other night and it was awful. Have I changed that much? I suppose so. Only watched it for about 15 minutes.

I wonder what sort of religious person would like Trump? I know that lots of Mormons did, and that was just one more reason to leave. How can a man that brags about mistreating women be elected President?
Read the book. The movie has almost nothing to do with the original story.
 

Saint Frankenstein

Wanderer From Afar
Premium Member
That's pretty much the only thing Trump gets criticized for that I think is misplaced.
He's criticized for it because he pretends to be the pro-military candidate and also because he dodged it out of pure selfishness, not due to any principled objection. Ted Nugent is another fake conservative who pretends to love the military while also being a selfish draft dodger. Also, why should someone else be sent in his place? He's not anymore special than anyone else.
 

Saint Frankenstein

Wanderer From Afar
Premium Member
This will be like kicking a beehive and I understand. I'm just feeling like only those who have felt the cost of having our Country understand it.

Perhaps there is a broader classification? America is in a mess because of a Draft Dodger.
No. Not everyone is fit to serve, whether for physical or mental reasons and it would be unjust to deny us the vote merely due to that. Democracy works better when the widest number of people can have their say.
 

Kangaroo Feathers

Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
I rented "Starship Troopers" the other night and it was awful. Have I changed that much? I suppose so. Only watched it for about 15 minutes.

I wonder what sort of religious person would like Trump? I know that lots of Mormons did, and that was just one more reason to leave. How can a man that brags about mistreating women be elected President?
*sigh* The movie is great as cheesecake sci-fi fantasy fluff. It has precisely nothing to do with the book. The book is deeply philosophical, and was literally what convinced me to join the army way back when. It's among my top three defining books I recommend to people, please consider reading it. (my other two are Heinlein's Stranger in a Strange Land, and T.H. White's Once and Future King, if anyone's interested)
 

Ellen Brown

Well-Known Member
US views wars as money making opportunities at the expense of human lives. We haven't had justified cause for involvement in decades. So why would I support becoming a military puppet to participate in the governing of this country?

I rather think US military should be having a much smaller budget and impact on the country than it is now.

Not being an expert, I have the suspicion that the WWI treaty caused WWII. And, how many times must the US and the rest of the Commonwealth bail out the British? I wonder about the Korean war? Vietnam was stupid and the rich were after Oil. The Middle Eastern wars of the 90s? What were we thinking when we invaded Afghanistan and Iraq? Eisenhower did warn us about the Military/Industrial complex...
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
He's criticized for it because he pretends to be the pro-military candidate and also because he dodged it out of pure selfishness, not due to any principled objection.
I'm okay with avoiding slavery for pretty much any reason.

And "pro-military" does not have to mean "pro-conscription." In fact, in a lot of ways, I think that being against conscription is the pro-military stance. It certainly shows more respect for soldiering as a profession.

Ted Nugent is another fake conservative who pretends to love the military while also being a selfish draft dodger. Also, why should someone else be sent in his place? He's not anymore special than anyone else.
Nobody should have been sent, period. Conscription is evil... conscription for the Vietnam War especially so.
 
Top