-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The "Eve gene" - another creationist fail
- Thread starter tas8831
- Start date
Wandering Monk
Well-Known Member
It will boil down to this eventually: goosebumps = God.
Shad
Veteran Member
Ergo does not support evolution at all. You are cherry picking.
Far more reasonable tests than what you have for yours.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
You know that is not true. Remember the Ninth Commandment. Just be honest and admit that you have none.
None that is important to you. I've already wasted the time it took to post three responses to you.
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
He didn't ask about your opinions of your tests.
He asked for you to explain what those tests are.
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
Ergo, you don't have any tests.
Yes... I know. I have answered many things to him/her in the past at the answers are always a retort or a put down vs an honest discussion.
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
If you had any worthy of mention, you'ld mention it / them.??? not another one!
Beam me up, Scotty!
Be serious.
We all know. The whole reason you require "faith" is, in fact, because you have no actual evidence (or tests)
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
You didn't answer this question. I don't know about what other posts you are refering to.
I'm quite interested in the answer myself, but I suspect you'll categorically refuse to live upto the challenge.
I'ld love to be proven wrong here.
Be happy to... HOWEVER,
I am not trying to "prove you wrong" other than your "categorically refuse to live up to the challenge" is somewhat self-serving and is wrong in attitude and presentation and content. And not pertaining to the OP.
So open another thread.
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
Just think about the amount of time and webspace you have wasted already, just to dance around for 4-5 posts while you could have just given a straightforward answer to a straightforward question right from the beginning.
You accuse me of being self-serving and "wrong in attitude", but meanwhile..... you completely confirm my expectation.
I'm not new to this game, you know. I have some experience already in what path such discussions tend to take. I actually even have first hand experience with you concerning such things.
My expectation wasn't mal-intended. It was just the most probable expectation based on my previous experiences concerning such types of questions and topics.
So far, I'm only seeing my expectation being confirmed. Can't say I'm surprised. Although I meant it when I said I'ld love to be proven wrong concerning my expectation.
Just once I'ld like to have a conversation like this to cross over the finish line. But somehow, for some reason, it always gets derailed and dodged into oblivion before that line even is in sight.
I understand though.
I knew that if you were really interested, you would have created the post. My surmise was that you wouldn't. You confirmed my suspicions.
Just think about the amount of time and webspace you have wasted already, just to dance around for 4-5 posts while you could have just given a straightforward answer to a straightforward question right from the beginning.
You accuse me of being self-serving and "wrong in attitude", but meanwhile..... you completely confirm my expectation.
I'm not new to this game, you know. I have some experience already in what path such discussions tend to take. I actually even have first hand experience with you concerning such things.
My expectation wasn't mal-intended. It was just the most probable expectation based on my previous experiences concerning such types of questions and topics.
So far, I'm only seeing my expectation being confirmed. Can't say I'm surprised. Although I meant it when I said I'ld love to be proven wrong concerning my expectation.
Just once I'ld like to have a conversation like this to cross over the finish line. But somehow, for some reason, it always gets derailed and dodged into oblivion before that line even is in sight.
I understand though.
I understand why and that's why I don't waste time on those types of questions from those who don't really want honest dialogue.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
You mean that you posted typical proselytizer nonsense. And then made false claims about others. Don't blame others when you cannot come up with a rational reason to believe.
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
You have given me exactly zero reasons to think that you'ld answer such questions honestly and sincerely in a seperate thread. You have given me much reason to think that it would be just a waste of time and that if I would persist, I'ld just end up chasing you for answers in vain for page upon page upon page.
That's because you set it up like that and pretty much invited me not to engage between the lines.
Kind of like a self-fullfilling prophecy.
And the dodging continues. The running excuse this time, is false accusations.
Groovy.
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
Doesn't it say somewhere in the new testament in Peter that believers should "always be prepared to give reasons for the faith that they have" or something?
Funny how there is a direct correlation between fundamentalist levels of belief and the ignoring of that passage.
The "stronger the faith", the lesser the willingness to "give reasons for the faith that they have", it seems.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Yes, it does. And this is a verse that proselytizers never seem to follow:
15 But in your hearts revere Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect,
Bible Gateway passage: 1 Peter 3:15 - New International Version