• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Mother God

susanblange

Active Member
'Purusha' and 'Prakriti' in Hindu 'Samkhya' philosophy.

"Samkhya is strongly dualist. Sāmkhya philosophy regards the universe as consisting of two realities, puruṣa (consciousness) and prakṛti (matter). Jiva (a living being) is that state in which puruṣa is bonded to prakṛti in some form. This fusion, state the Samkhya scholars, led to the emergence of buddhi ("intellect") and ahamkāra (ego consciousness). The universe is described by this school as one created by purusa-prakṛti entities infused with various combinations of variously enumerated elements, senses, feelings, activity and mind."
Samkhya - Wikipedia
Why does the sacrifice always has to be a female?We do more than that. Don't we?
You would have to ask God that. Only God in spirit form knows that.
 

susanblange

Active Member
Thus, what does a majestic plural mean?
Literally translated, Elohim means "gods". It is actually mistranslated and should be "judges". Exodus 22:28. "Thou shalt not revile the gods, nor curse the ruler of thy people". There is more to God than the Lord.
 

firedragon

Veteran Member
Literally translated, Elohim means "gods". It is actually mistranslated and should be "judges". Exodus 22:28. "Thou shalt not revile the gods, nor curse the ruler of thy people". There is more to God than the Lord.

Doesn't majestic plural mean its singular?
 

stvdv

Veteran Member: I Share (not Debate) my POV
Do you believe God is just as much a tender mother as a loving father? (If you believe in God)
IF God is the Creator
And God created us humans
Putting the essence of Him in us
Then we can create God as a mother or a father

So "Yes" ... to your question
 

firedragon

Veteran Member
Yes, God is singular. Deuteronomy 6:4. "Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God is one Lord".

Brother. I didn't ask if God was singular. My question was "doesn't majestic plural mean its singular".

Anyway, just to state something, according to the Bible, Moses was called Elohim. Plural. Thats "Pluralis Majestatis". Singular. Plural of respect. The thing is many people argue that Elohim is a plural so that signifies a trinity, and some also argue that it signifies that its not monotheism, its polytheism. A consortium of Gods.

I believe all of those arguments are not sensible.

Also brother Elohim doesn't mean God. The word means "powers". Plural of "power". It is a word used for God, it doesn't mean God. El means power or might. Thus, literally translated, the word Elohim means powers or plural of might.

Anyway, trying not to be irrelevant, I only asked about the Pluralis Majestatis and the fact that its a singular reference because you said that God is a male and a female come together in the flesh and in the same breath when saying Elohim is Pluralis Majestatis. Its conflicting. Plural of numbers is plural and plural of majesty is singular. So man and woman, husband and wife, are never together referred to as plural of majesty. Thats plural of numbers.

Thats the reason I questioned you asking 'isn't plurals majestatis singular' because you referred to union of a man and wife alluding god was such a union.

Cheers.
 

susanblange

Active Member
Brother. I didn't ask if God was singular. My question was "doesn't majestic plural mean its singular".

Anyway, just to state something, according to the Bible, Moses was called Elohim. Plural. Thats "Pluralis Majestatis". Singular. Plural of respect. The thing is many people argue that Elohim is a plural so that signifies a trinity, and some also argue that it signifies that its not monotheism, its polytheism. A consortium of Gods.

I believe all of those arguments are not sensible.

Also brother Elohim doesn't mean God. The word means "powers". Plural of "power". It is a word used for God, it doesn't mean God. El means power or might. Thus, literally translated, the word Elohim means powers or plural of might.

Anyway, trying not to be irrelevant, I only asked about the Pluralis Majestatis and the fact that its a singular reference because you said that God is a male and a female come together in the flesh and in the same breath when saying Elohim is Pluralis Majestatis. Its conflicting. Plural of numbers is plural and plural of majesty is singular. So man and woman, husband and wife, are never together referred to as plural of majesty. Thats plural of numbers.

Thats the reason I questioned you asking 'isn't plurals majestatis singular' because you referred to union of a man and wife alluding god was such a union.

Cheers.
God is a husband and a wife but there is only one personal God who is called "The Lord". The male/husband part of God is Energy and the female/wife part is The Lord. On earth, the Lord will inhabit the body of a woman. She is also called "The Messiah" because she has been chosen and she will be anointed by the Jews as King of the Universe. Where in the OT is Moses called "Elohim"? El means God.
 

firedragon

Veteran Member
God is a husband and a wife but there is only one personal God who is called "The Lord". The male/husband part of God is Energy and the female/wife part is The Lord. On earth, the Lord will inhabit the body of a woman. She is also called "The Messiah" because she has been chosen and she will be anointed by the Jews as King of the Universe. Where in the OT is Moses called "Elohim"? El means God.

1. "And the LORD said unto Moses, See, I have made thee a god to Pharaoh: and Aaron thy brother shall be thy prophet. - Exodus 7:1.

אֱלֹהִ֖ים - Elohim. Moses is sent as Elohim to the pharaoh. That does not mean Moses is a plural of any sort. It is one of respect, and Moses is not God, he is a representative of God. And Aaron is sent as a prophet of Moses. Know the Bible. Read it fully. Study it. Better.

2. Sorry. But you seem to just insist on certain things without doing the research or making an analysis. El does not mean God. It means power or might. It is a "reference" to God. I know that you will insist again. You are wrong, and I get the feeling you are not planning to do the research. So be it.

3. You said Elohim is pluralis majestatis which is singular and now you insist its a plural of a husband and wife. Show evidence please from the Bible to your claim and I can vouch that you will not be able to provide any.

4. Messiah of the Jews in their concept is not a king of the universe, he is the king of the Jews. That is why the romans wrote "king of the Jews" on the board on the cross. Thats the accusation that he claimed to be the messiah, king of the Jews. Thats a practice of the romans to show the accusation of the crucified so that others learn the lesson. Don't mess with Rome. Jewish concept of the Messiah is that he is a male, a descendent of David, king of the Jews. Not a woman. Not God. Not part of God. Not divine. Not Gods wife. Definitely not. Not in the Jewish idea. Maybe some other idea. Again, not in the Jewish idea.

Sorry to bust your bubble brother, but you will not find any evidence to any of your claims from the Bible, Talmud, Midrash, other scripture, the Tanah, or commentary of serious Jewish scholarship.

So rather than repeating something please provide evidence to your claim. I hope its not an offensive request.

Peace.
 

susanblange

Active Member
1. "And the LORD said unto Moses, See, I have made thee a god to Pharaoh: and Aaron thy brother shall be thy prophet. - Exodus 7:1.

אֱלֹהִ֖ים - Elohim. Moses is sent as Elohim to the pharaoh. That does not mean Moses is a plural of any sort. It is one of respect, and Moses is not God, he is a representative of God. And Aaron is sent as a prophet of Moses. Know the Bible. Read it fully. Study it. Better.

2. Sorry. But you seem to just insist on certain things without doing the research or making an analysis. El does not mean God. It means power or might. It is a "reference" to God. I know that you will insist again. You are wrong, and I get the feeling you are not planning to do the research. So be it.

3. You said Elohim is pluralis majestatis which is singular and now you insist its a plural of a husband and wife. Show evidence please from the Bible to your claim and I can vouch that you will not be able to provide any.

4. Messiah of the Jews in their concept is not a king of the universe, he is the king of the Jews. That is why the romans wrote "king of the Jews" on the board on the cross. Thats the accusation that he claimed to be the messiah, king of the Jews. Thats a practice of the romans to show the accusation of the crucified so that others learn the lesson. Don't mess with Rome. Jewish concept of the Messiah is that he is a male, a descendent of David, king of the Jews. Not a woman. Not God. Not part of God. Not divine. Not Gods wife. Definitely not. Not in the Jewish idea. Maybe some other idea. Again, not in the Jewish idea.

Sorry to bust your bubble brother, but you will not find any evidence to any of your claims from the Bible, Talmud, Midrash, other scripture, the Tanah, or commentary of serious Jewish scholarship.

So rather than repeating something please provide evidence to your claim. I hope its not an offensive request.

Peace.
1. "And the LORD said unto Moses, See, I have made thee a god to Pharaoh: and Aaron thy brother shall be thy prophet. - Exodus 7:1.

אֱלֹהִ֖ים - Elohim. Moses is sent as Elohim to the pharaoh. That does not mean Moses is a plural of any sort. It is one of respect, and Moses is not God, he is a representative of God. And Aaron is sent as a prophet of Moses. Know the Bible. Read it fully. Study it. Better.

2. Sorry. But you seem to just insist on certain things without doing the research or making an analysis. El does not mean God. It means power or might. It is a "reference" to God. I know that you will insist again. You are wrong, and I get the feeling you are not planning to do the research. So be it.

3. You said Elohim is pluralis majestatis which is singular and now you insist its a plural of a husband and wife. Show evidence please from the Bible to your claim and I can vouch that you will not be able to provide any.

4. Messiah of the Jews in their concept is not a king of the universe, he is the king of the Jews. That is why the romans wrote "king of the Jews" on the board on the cross. Thats the accusation that he claimed to be the messiah, king of the Jews. Thats a practice of the romans to show the accusation of the crucified so that others learn the lesson. Don't mess with Rome. Jewish concept of the Messiah is that he is a male, a descendent of David, king of the Jews. Not a woman. Not God. Not part of God. Not divine. Not Gods wife. Definitely not. Not in the Jewish idea. Maybe some other idea. Again, not in the Jewish idea.

Sorry to bust your bubble brother, but you will not find any evidence to any of your claims from the Bible, Talmud, Midrash, other scripture, the Tanah, or commentary of serious Jewish scholarship.

So rather than repeating something please provide evidence to your claim. I hope its not an offensive request.

Peace.
I do not know if you are a Jew or a Catholic or both. They are mutually exclusive, Christianity is idolatry. God as a husband and wife is Genesis 2:24, and Isaiah 54:5-6. The cross is an X, a St. Andrews cross. "They have tilted my holy cross". It is a letter of the Lord's name and the mark that was put on Cain. God created Israel for his glory. The Jews are incredibly ignorant when it comes to the Messiah, they have rejected her which is the fulfillment of prophecy. Job 24:1, Hosea 4:6 Psalm 110:3. The "crucifixion" happened on October 22, 1969. The date corresponds to the Psalms it fulfilled. Psalms 22 and 69. The "betrayal" also happened in the beginning of 1984 and the Messiah was publicly humiliated. SOS 7:8, SOS 2:3, Psalm 34:8, Zechariah 11. The incident in the Garden of Eden was reenacted. Adam Ribdick, Matthew and Luke committed suicide by hanging. Isaiah 11:4. Adam/Satan was created as the antithesis of God, he is a man (serpent) and God is a woman. The Messiah is the seed of Eve. Genesis 3:15, Genesis 4:25.
 

firedragon

Veteran Member
I do not know if you are a Jew or a Catholic or both. They are mutually exclusive, Christianity is idolatry. God as a husband and wife is Genesis 2:24, and Isaiah 54:5-6. The cross is an X, a St. Andrews cross. "They have tilted my holy cross". It is a letter of the Lord's name and the mark that was put on Cain. God created Israel for his glory. The Jews are incredibly ignorant when it comes to the Messiah, they have rejected her which is the fulfillment of prophecy. Job 24:1, Hosea 4:6 Psalm 110:3. The "crucifixion" happened on October 22, 1969. The date corresponds to the Psalms it fulfilled. Psalms 22 and 69. The "betrayal" also happened in the beginning of 1984 and the Messiah was publicly humiliated. SOS 7:8, SOS 2:3, Psalm 34:8, Zechariah 11. The incident in the Garden of Eden was reenacted. Adam Ribdick, Matthew and Luke committed suicide by hanging. Isaiah 11:4. Adam/Satan was created as the antithesis of God, he is a man (serpent) and God is a woman. The Messiah is the seed of Eve. Genesis 3:15, Genesis 4:25.

It doesn't matter who I am or what my faith is. What matters is what the scripture says. Even if you don't believe in that particular scripture, even if its all bogus, we should first get what it says. Just as a study at least.

And thanks for all kinds of words but none of your references correlate with your theories.

cheers.
 
Top