• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Quote about the origin of violence?

Neutral Name

Active Member
Disagree. Blame the victim mentality. This could be taken as a Carde Blanche for those prone to violence to be violent to anyone they perceive as "different." They can just make up a label, apply it to someone, and be "justified" in their being violent to someone. (aka scapegoating.)

Isn't that how many people operate - well, I hope it's not many.
 

Neutral Name

Active Member
Yes, tribalism is divisive and leads to exploitation and violence. Christianity and Islam seek to extinguish it, and form a unified, cosmopolitan society. Alas, people seem to ignore this. Churches still seem to think patriotism is a good thing.

I'm not sure I would label what they do patriotism, maybe politics.
 

Neutral Name

Active Member
Violence is force. I could turn this around and say if you force yourself on someone who doesn't really want to be around you; then you're violent. If people want to be separate; they have that right.

You are absolutely right. That is what abuse is, rape is, murder is and some religious people are.
 

Neutral Name

Active Member
Well yes i have had to protect both my self and my family, But i did not use any force to harm the person. I dont see the point of using force toward someone.

Sometimes you might have to. If someone was pointing a gun at a family member and you had a gun, wouldn't you shoot? I love peace but I also believe in defense - that's my military background.
 

Neutral Name

Active Member
Is being attacked by a man with a gun "good enough" for you?
Still there is no need to harm that person, disarm yes, but no need to harm

Only if you can disarm the person. If he is too far to reach, you might need to make a different decision. Many things depend on the circumstances involved. You can't make blanket statements.
 

Neutral Name

Active Member
Some people are given to violence and are beyond being helped by words.

Understand that those people have their own problems, lots of anger, pain and sometimes fear. No excuse, just want you to see that every story has at least two sides.
 

Neutral Name

Active Member
I tend to agree, but there seems to be a natural violence within us as well (as a species, and hardly unique to us), perhaps as a natural reaction to events or how we perceive reality. A mother (of most species), will react violently to any harm threatened to their child. That seems to be quite natural. Our instinct for survival might also do the same - fighting over the last lifeboat, for example. But, as I said earlier, the imposition or recognition of labels is possibly the most serious aspect that often invokes violence these days. It seems that we can't but fail to label others - just so convenient, and it saves all the hard work of compassion, understanding, and tolerance. :rolleyes:

I try to be as non-violent and non-labeling as possible but when I see that some people are verbally or physically violent, I am concerned. I try to understand their reasoning but sometimes it is just narcissism, selfishness, greed and hardheartedness.
 

Neutral Name

Active Member
If he is far away i would walk away

If you can but I was raised with guns. They will shoot for a great distance and just running allows the shooter to shoot you often. It does take an excellent marksman to shoot someone who weaves, however. Running straight away will not save you.
 

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
If you can but I was raised with guns. They will shoot for a great distance and just running allows the shooter to shoot you often. It does take an excellent marksman to shoot someone who weaves, however. Running straight away will not save you.
I know one should not walk in straight line :)
 

Neutral Name

Active Member
As a pacifist i would not carry a gun or shoot someone with it.

So, would you just allow the other person to kill you, a family member or any other human being? The police have to shoot violent people. Granted, there are police who are unjust in the way they treat others but some are just and need to stop violent people. If there were less people stopping violence, violence would be even more pronounced.
 

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
So, would you just allow the other person to kill you, a family member or any other human being? The police have to shoot violent people. Granted, there are police who are unjust in the way they treat others but some are just and need to stop violent people. If there were less people stopping violence, violence would be even more pronounced.
I would of course protect my family, if i die in doing so it is ok. But no i will not use guns
 

Jedster

Well-Known Member
If it was martial art or just a technique used to disarm him does not matter, the point is,one does not need to punch or kick someone after they have been put down.
As a buddhist i see no good reason to harm other
, Where i grew up was based on good people who do not want to harm others. But in the City they did look at it differently yes.


I agree, but sometimes one has to be physical in order to put them down. N'est-ce pas?

Well the only reason to harm someone is if it prevents worse harm, you know, like someone is about to knife you or similar.

It is easy to talk theoretically here, but in real-time there is hardly any time to think about it.
If you really value life, you will use violence when all else fails.
Buddhist or not.
 

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
I agree, but sometimes one has to be physical in order to put them down. N'est-ce pas?

Well the only reason to harm someone is if it prevents worse harm, you know, like someone is about to knife you or similar.

It is easy to talk theoretically here, but in real-time there is hardly any time to think about it.
If you really value life, you will use violence when all else fails.
Buddhist or not.
I have not used in to harm others and will not use force to harm others As a Buddhist i live a peaceful life, and if others harm me that is their problem
 
Top