• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Arguments for or against god

Samael_Khan

Goosebender
Exactly. As I said, there are many versions. Which one is the inerrant word of God? I'm sorry, Israel, I'm not trying to pick on you. You are one of my favorite posters and, obviously, a good person. I just want the truth out. And I actually knew that the Apocryphal books were not part of Jewish scripture but the early church did include them in the Bible. So, I wanted to see what the Christians would say about that.

Thanks for such a nice comment :)

I don't mind being picked on if it is called for or helps with understanding.

I was under the impression that you didn't know.

I would say that none are the inerrent word of God. But then again I am not a Christian but I knew that when I was one (If JW's are considered Christian).
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
Ok so if you don't like the God alternative..... What option do you propose?

Matter/energy came from nothing? They have always existed? What explanation do you propose and why is that alternative better than God?

No, I like the God alternative. I am just a skeptic. I just don't like people claiming knowledge, if they don't have it.
 

We Never Know

No Slack
So as a global skeptic, know is a deeply held belief, which you don't doubt. Knowledge is a belief, which apparently works and there can be given no reason, logic or evidence for it. It is the belief that reason, logic and evidence work.

To answer your prior question of how do we know the earth rotates, we've measured it, observed it(from space), calculated its speed, tested it, etc. So I think I can safely say we know the earth rotates.
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
Ok , so what alternative do you suggest? And why is that alternative better than God ?

I didn't say it is better. I pointed out the limits of arguing from the point of a first unmoved mover. It only tells you God created the world. Not what kind of God.
 

leroy

Well-Known Member
No, I like the God alternative. I am just a skeptic. I just don't like people claiming knowledge, if they don't have it.
I personally don't claim to know with 100% certanity.

I am just suggesting that amoung the alternatives that can think of God is the best explanation..

I am not even saying that God us a Good explanation, all I am saying is that it is the best we have.


But I am open to other alternatives, just let me know what alternatives we have and why are they a better explanation than God
 

We Never Know

No Slack
And where did that energy came from? Where did the energy from other universes came from ?


And

Why is the white hole "alternative" better than God?

I never said the white hole hypothesis was better, it's an alternative which you asked for.
Why do you feel if we don't yet know, just insert god did it and it's right?
 

leroy

Well-Known Member
I didn't say it is better. I pointed out the limits of arguing from the point of a first unmoved mover. It only tells you God created the world. Not what kind of God.
Granted.


Christians would have to provide additional arguments to show that their God is the correct one.... But Christians are not shy about this, they constantly provide such arguments (argument for the resurrection for example)
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
I personally don't claim to know with 100% certanity.

I am just suggesting that amoung the alternatives that can think of God is the best explanation..

I am not even saying that God us a Good explanation, all I am saying is that it is the best we have.


But I am open to other alternatives, just let me know what alternatives we have and why are they a better explanation than God

God is not a better explanation or worse. It is your explanation, but that doesn't decide if there is a God or not. Neither does the claim that there is no God explain anything or decide that there is no God. It is unknown what reality really is, including whether there is a God or not.
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
Granted.


Christians would have to provide additional arguments to show that their God is the correct one.... But Christians are not shy about this, they constantly provide such arguments (argument for the resurrection for example)

Yeah, and in the end they require faith and nothing else.
 

leroy

Well-Known Member
I never said the white hole hypothesis was better, it's an alternative which you asked for.
Why do you feel if we don't yet know, just insert god did it and it's right?
Granted we don't know yet. That is the answers.


But the relevant question is: amoung all the explanations that have been proposed, which is the best explanation?

I would argue that God is the best explanation... But anyone is free to disagree and propose some other alternative
 

Samael_Khan

Goosebender
To me, it goes beyond what science and math currently understand. What created existence? What made matter, time, energy and space. Without these there would be no existence. Where did they come from? I don't see science or math explaining these.

Exatly. It seems that all is conjecture.
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
Granted we don't know yet. That is the answers.


But the relevant question is: amoung all the explanations that have been proposed, which is the best explanation?

I would argue that God is the best explanation... But anyone is free to disagree and propose some other alternative

I don't know, is the best explanation with reason and logic. Others are better, if you feel for one of them.
 

leroy

Well-Known Member
Yeah, and in the end they require faith and nothing else.
The argument of the resurrection is not depended on faith.

Those who defend the argument that the new testament as a man made document , and the claims are explored with the same criteria one would explore any historical documents.
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
The argument of the resurrection is not depended on faith.

Those who defend the argument that the new testament as a man made document , and the claims are explored with the same criteria one would explore any historical documents.

They require a God, who can resurrect from the dead, That is faith.
 
Top