Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Look forward to seeing your contributions.Hi everyone! My name is Dill, and I'm new to the forum. I'm a student at the University of Georgia majoring in English education.
I have been a Christian for five years. My upbringing was thoroughly Pentecostal, but around the age of 15, I began to identify as agnostic. When I was 16, I had a spiritual experience during which I became a Christian. I am now a Southern Baptist, and I hold to a fairly orthodox theology and view of Scripture.
If anyone is interested in learning more about my views, learning how they came to be, or challenging them, I welcome it through both this thread and PM.
Hi everyone! My name is Dill, and I'm new to the forum. I'm a student at the University of Georgia majoring in English education.
I have been a Christian for five years. My upbringing was thoroughly Pentecostal, but around the age of 15, I began to identify as agnostic. When I was 16, I had a spiritual experience during which I became a Christian. I am now a Southern Baptist, and I hold to a fairly orthodox theology and view of Scripture.
If anyone is interested in learning more about my views, learning how they came to be, or challenging them, I welcome it through both this thread and PM.
Hi everyone! My name is Dill, and I'm new to the forum. I'm a student at the University of Georgia majoring in English education.
I have been a Christian for five years. My upbringing was thoroughly Pentecostal, but around the age of 15, I began to identify as agnostic. When I was 16, I had a spiritual experience during which I became a Christian. I am now a Southern Baptist, and I hold to a fairly orthodox theology and view of Scripture.
If anyone is interested in learning more about my views, learning how they came to be, or challenging them, I welcome it through both this thread and PM.
Oh another Dill...are we related? Dills are fairly common on these boards.....you'll spot them no doubt.
One thing I would like to ask is....how does one go from being Pentecostal to agnostic and then to a "spiritual experience" leading to Southern Baptists? That would be interesting.....
Happy to answer!
There wasn't much choice involved in being Pentecostal. Both my parents are Apostolic Pentecostals, and so I was brought up. However, around 16, I became disenfranchised with Pentecostalism. I wasn't familiar with any evidence for the claims of Pentecostalism, and I had never had any spiritual encounters confirming their claims to truth, or any claims to any religious truth. In the absence of both internal and external evidence, I decided I was agnostic.
I began doing research in pursuit of external evidence, but as a 16-year-old, I barely scratched the surface, despite feeling that I knew a great deal. One day, a Christian friend was responding to questions I posed about Christianity, and I began to experience the immaterial presence of a being greater than me as he told the story of Jesus' life, death, and resurrection. The spiritual presence produced a surprising emotional response, and I found myself helplessly crying despite feeling upset about nothing in particular.
My friend continued, and I felt that spiritual being pressing upon my mind and will, and I knew the time had come to reject or accept His existence and submit myself to Him, knowing these choices were also connected to the story of Jesus I was hearing. I accepted, and the emotions faded, but I continued to experience that rich spiritual presence, which oftentimes still presents itself in similar ways to that day.
From then, I felt beholden to no particular denomination, but as I grew spiritually, so too did my understanding, and my beliefs began to gravitate toward those of the Southern Baptist Convention. I am not unconditionally committed to the Southern Baptist Convention, but my beliefs best align with theirs, and I have a deep appreciation for all they do.
And thus is my journey from Pentecostalism to agnosticism to Southern Baptist Convention...ism.
Thank you for sharing. I am always fascinated by the number of ways that people come to "Christianity".
When we look at the divided state of Christendom, and consider that all those 'denominations' (literally thousands of them) all claim Jesus as the Christ, and yet hold differing beliefs about so many things......how can there be one truth? Aren't all Christians supposed to be in agreement? (1 Corinthians 1:10) Why does Christ exist divided?
When we choose our 'denomination', what are we in fact choosing? How do we disagree with one 'brand' of Christianity and yet agree with another if they are all the same faith? What are your thoughts?
If I was to ask you what is there about Pentecostalism that makes you abandon it in favor of the Southern Baptist version of the Christian faith? You may have compared the various denominations in order to accept what you settled on, but even then you don't sound 100% convinced. What is causing the nagging doubt, do you think?
Thanks! I really enjoy your post, and I'm excited to respond! Sorry for the lateness, I got caught up in finals for summer classes, but that's all out of the way now.
This is interesting, and it's certainly disheartening that perception of truth within the body of Christ is so divided. However, I don't believe that the quantity of conflicting claims to truth within Christianity has any bearing upon the existence of objective truth about these issues over which denominations are divided. I think of evolution. The issue isn't as simple as whether or not evolution occurred. There is a spectrum of beliefs that is very nuanced, yet this multitude of beliefs doesn't cast doubt upon the existence of objective truth about these issues.
I do agree that the biblical ideal is one of all Christians unified in belief. However, Paul isn't exhorting anyone to abdicate their views for the sake of unity. This is evidenced by the many specific, contested beliefs he holds. I believe instead that Christians should engage in lively, robust dialogue about the reasons for divisions among denominations in pursuit of a meeting of minds.
When two people regularly engage in conversation about things, they find themselves over time converging in their beliefs, and I believe Paul is calling for this in the Church. Unfortunately, this ideal is rarely realized. I believe the Church is divided because of the fallibility of people's mental faculties, but I believe that through reason and open-minded discourse, Christians can grow nearer to a truer interpretation of the Bible and Christ's ministry.
I believe that ideally, we're choosing a set of interpretations of the Bible and Christ's ministry that we believe best conform to the truth. All denominations that converge on some basic facts like Christ's life, death for our sins, and resurrection belong to the same faith. However, we have the ability to more specifically analyze the Bible and Jesus' ministry and come to conclusions. Denominations are structures that are shorthands for sets of beliefs, but also that provide spaces and opportunities to minister without having to confront differences of beliefs that are otherwise insignificant, but that in that context would hinder ministry. For example, if a Catholic and Southern Baptist church merged, there would be conflicts about the ways services are carried out-- issues for which there is no middle road. The time needed to resolve these differences would hinder ministry.
I abandoned Pentecostalism because of their views on corporate speaking of tongues and other divine gifts, as well as their understanding of salvation. You are right that I am not 100% convinced of the Southern Baptist interpretation of the Bible and Christ's ministry, but that is primarily because I do not feel so well-read and knowledgeable that I can be entirely convinced of every position held by the Southern Baptist Convention.
Sorry for the lengthiness of this post! I don't expect you to respond to all of it, and I promise I won't interpret all that you don't respond to as a concession. Thanks again for taking the time to respond to my OP.