• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What Irks You Most About Atheists, Agnostics, And Non-Believers?

Darkforbid

Well-Known Member
Actually? YES I WOULD! If there were, IN FACT, but One (1) GOD?

I would absolutely expect everyone to follow the same religion -- because the source of that religion would be from a single, solitary being.

Instead of the mish-mash we have Today, with millions upon millions of different flavors of 'theist'....

... nay-- billions--

It is as if there wasn't any actual god behind any of them....

Why would you expect different times and cultures to have the same theological idears
 

PruePhillip

Well-Known Member
Think in terms of, "They . . . ."
.

With some atheists is the belief that science backs their cause.
In fact science and religion are separate realms.
And the claim that the whole of existence sprang into being all
on its own is a more outrageous claim than saying something
outside of it all created the universe.
 

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
Why would you expect different times and cultures to have the same theological idears

If there truly were just the one god? Absolutely! It follows.

I would also expect only one "holey" book as well-- and that none of the fake ones would be suffered to even exist in the first place.

What we have? Is utter chaos -- millions of different "holy" texts, most in direct competition with the others.

As if there was no single Authority of any merit whatsoever...
 

Samantha Rinne

Resident Genderfluid Writer/Artist
If I had to say, it would be their complete inability to understand the Gospel.

They talk about how the Bible is too many more rules. But actually the people suffering most under moralism are they themselves.

Let me explain. Secular morality constantly judges the worth of people by what they do for a living, how much they earn, etc, etc, etc. This is no different from Jewish system of the Law, or the sort of understanding of Christianity that a child would have. But morality is not Christian. Nor is denying one has sin.

The Gospel teaches us neither that there is no such thing as sin, nor that we are to prove ourselves worthy. The cross is given to us so that we understand that while all of us have failed, our worth is intrinsic not something to be measured with some impressive job.
 
Last edited:

Liu

Well-Known Member
Why does it bother you that people don't agree with you on the benefits of religious beliefs?

Why are you so certain that religious beliefs bestow psychological benefits? So far, all I've seen are anecdotal assertions; your own experience and what it seems to have on others. Believing that, since you see, everyone should see it, is very arrogant.

I find the claim that some religions are good for some and some bad for some to be less arrogant than the claim that all religions are bad for everyone, that's what I was talking about.
I don't expect the atheists in question to become convinced that religion can help some people, but just to become open to the possibility. What I was complaining about was their conviction that it can never be something beneficial.
 

oldbadger

Skanky Old Mongrel!

.
large.jpg

This isn't meant to get personal, ragging on your most detested atheist, agnostic, or non-believer, but to consider the most irksome general approaches and conduct they display.

Think in terms of, "They . . . ."
.

THE MIFFERS!

It's (only) the Miffers!

The ones who shout out that the bible is all a myth.

This irks me because I know that I can learn nothing from such dunces about the true parts that abound in the bible. I mean, you've gotta be a total nutter to be a full on devoted Miffer!

Other Atheists and Agnostics are all beautiful people. :D
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
With some atheists is the belief that science backs their cause.
In fact science and religion are separate realms.
And the claim that the whole of existence sprang into being all
on its own is a more outrageous claim than saying something
outside of it all created the universe.
So how did this "something" spring into existence?

.
 

loverofhumanity

We are all the leaves of one tree
Premium Member

.
large.jpg

This isn't meant to get personal, ragging on your most detested atheist, agnostic, or non-believer, but to consider the most irksome general approaches and conduct they display.

Think in terms of, "They . . . ."


.

Nothing at all as they are just human beings like myself. I may not agree with some of their views but that doesn’t mean we can’t be good friends.
 

PruePhillip

Well-Known Member
So how did this "something" spring into existence?
.

There's only two options as far as I can tell. The universe either:
1 - created itself
2 - created by God.

Both are miracles.
When people say that matter can form from energy or there's this
"quantum vacuum" where things can pop into existence they are
forgetting that once there was no energy or quantum of any kind.
 

Liu

Well-Known Member
There's only two options as far as I can tell. The universe either:
1 - created itself
2 - created by God.

Both are miracles.
When people say that matter can form from energy or there's this
"quantum vacuum" where things can pop into existence they are
forgetting that once there was no energy or quantum of any kind.
That's far from all options.

It could also:
- be created by a group of beings
- be a virtual reality within another universe
- have existed always, or developed out of another universe
- ...

And that there was no energy etc before the big bang is one of several theories.
 

Martin

Spam, wonderful spam (bloody vikings!)
They worship at supermarkets on a Sunday morning, and pray to Saint Dawkins when nobody is listening.
 
Top