Prometheus85
Active Member
Like I said. The irony is almost always lost on people who used this phrase. Especially if bootstraps argument is almost always made in bad faith, and assumes the absolute worst about the people it’s directed toward.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Is a Flat Tax Fair?
- Thread starter Prometheus85
- Start date
Like I said. The irony is almost always lost on people who used this phrase. Especially if bootstraps argument is almost always made in bad faith, and assumes the absolute worst about the people it’s directed toward.
Jollybear
Hey
The point is, poor people have the opertunity to rise out of poverty, just like many ritch people USE to be poor, but rose out of it.
FACT!
Assumes the worst of people?
You're kidding right?
It's not assuming the worst of someone.
It's expecting the better of someone.
This idea that people can't help themselves. Is a form of bigotry. Here: racism of low expectations - Wiktionary
You expect very little of anyone. By doing this you allow them to stay right where they are. You are oppressing them by coddling them. Basically it's chains used to keep someone down.
You should be lifting them up. Making them aim high. Not for you, for themselves! Encourage them to aim higher, and improve themselves.
With the current tax system, those on the bottom pay nothing or get an EITC.
That's an interesting idea.
If you dealt with the poor, you'd realize that everything in their environment tells them that they'll always be poor. A few have a mentor or someone who makes a difference in their life, but most don't. FACT.
Depends on what you mean by bottom.
$5,000 or more in earnings either by paycheck or self-employed within the tax year and you have file with the IRS. More than likely they will get a small sum back so long as they claimed 0 throughout the tax period. Self employed will have to set money aside to pay taxes at the end of the year when they file.
Under $5,000 still pay taxes on a paycheck but don't have to file with the IRS.
Salvador
RF's Swedenborgian
Since, poor people have a lower percentage of discretionary income than well-to-do privilege class people, then I believe it's only fair low-income people should pay a lower effective tax rate than the effective tax rate of wealthy people. Imho, impoverished people, those living below the poverty level, should be exempt from paying any federal income taxes.
The tax cut and jobs act of 2017 did raise the standard deduction amount to $12,000, which means anybody living in poverty is totally excused from any federal income taxes. ...
Last edited:
Salvador
RF's Swedenborgian
In just a few words I can sum up big problems with the implementation of a wealth tax: valuation and liquidity.
The Problem With a Wealth Tax
Samantha Rinne
Resident Genderfluid Writer/Artist
What isn't fair is an income tax in the first place.
You work your butt off on a 9 to 5, and people who claim to governing you take a pound of flesh from you without directly helping you at all. It kinda strikes me like a landlord who claims he fixed the electricity so he raises the rent, and you later find he duct taped the power line. I cannot tell you how often our state government has wasted money on repairing roads that don't need it, while a bridge across town still hasn't been fixed. And yet, state government is still more effective than federal government, which has spent money on crackpot studies and when I want them to do basic border security, instead states of Detroit and Michigan are overrun by anti-American interests. Yet they have the gall to tell us that the national debt is ours to pay back, when they spend like spoiled teenagers with a credit card on things that are against the peace of mind of the country.
And what really isn't fair is that income tax is basically a means of controlling the entrepreneur. A small business owner must pay taxes TWICE, as a employer and employee. This basically means that people are induced to stay dependent on controlling employers instead of finding their own dreams.
But yes, a flat tax would be more fair. Lemme show you how.
First, income tax being flat (which they wrongly call regressive, despite the fact that the flat tax is all percent while the progressive actually includes monetary amounts):
$9000 = (if exempt due to minimums, nothing otherwise) $900
$39,000 = $3900
$160k = $16k
$510k = $51k
And so on...
If you cut the very poor out of this and get rid of property taxes (which are unethical, because if you own a lease to land the government should not be able to tell you that you're "renting it" and they want the land back), yes it's very fair. Just set aside a 1/10 of your yearly income and you can manage. Now let's look at "progressive tax."
$0 to $9,700 = 10% of taxable income
$9,701 to $39,475 = $970 plus 12% of the amount over $9,700
$39,476 to $84,200 = $4,543 plus 22% of the amount over $39,475
$84,201 to $160,725 = $14,382.50 plus 24% of the amount over $84,200
$160,726 to $204,100 = $32,748.50 plus 32% of the amount over $160,725
$204,101 to $510,300 = $46,628.50 plus 35% of the amount over $204,100
$510,301 or more = $153,798.50 plus 37% of the amount over $510,300
They added a monetary amount in addition to percent taxes. Let's compare.
$9701 = $970 (flat, though I wouldn't even charge at this level) vs $970 (progressive)
$39,476 = $3947.6 (flat) vs $4,543 (progressive, as you can see, you're already pay $546 more because the amount from the percent leads each time to next bracket)
$84,201 = $8420.1 (flat) vs $14,382 ("progressive", it went up $5962)
$160,726 = $16,072 (flat) vs $32,748.50 ("progressive" it's now double)
$204,101 = $20,410.1 (flat) vs $46,628.50 ("progressive" nearly 2.5x)
$510,301 = $51,030.1 (flat) vs $153,798.50 ("progressive", three times as much)
I quoted "progressive", because taxes that keep rising don't actually encourage progress. Instead, they help hard workers quit, since their efforts are rewarded by more penalties. The taxes progress, creating more suffering as the "rich" never get ahead. Btw, I don't even pay taxes, because I earn so little as to be exempt from much of it in my state. In fact, I overdeclared my income (my actual income right now is about $500, but I said I earn btwn $1500 and $3000, mainly to pay into social security).
Not only does this system create annoying math (hiring a tax preparer which in turn mean refund gets a chunk cut out) but you get slammed with extra money each bracket. Proponents of this plan like to convince people that it's "fair" because it's taxing the "rich" but what they're really doing is playing off of people's envy. What happens though when you start to earn more money, and get hit by nearly 1/4 of your earnings? Payback isn't fair, it's petty. Stop thinking about other people, and you yourself will be able to keep more of what you earn to instead get a humanitarian guilt complex (or whatever kick liberals get from high taxes) another way. Heifer.org is always looking for money.
Last edited:
Salvador
RF's Swedenborgian
An analysis by the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center (TPC) estimates that under the Tax Cut and Jobs Act bill enacted by the Republican controlled congress and President Trump , high-income Americans will pay an even larger percentage of the country’s overall income taxes in 2018 than they did before, while people in lower brackets will pay a smaller amount.
Specifically, the TPC estimates that the 20 percent of Americans that earn $150,000 or more will account for 52 percent of the country’s income, unchanged from last year, but will pay about 87 percent of total income taxes, up from 84 percent in 2017. It's nice to see the wealthy pay our “fair share”.
Specifically, the TPC estimates that the 20 percent of Americans that earn $150,000 or more will account for 52 percent of the country’s income, unchanged from last year, but will pay about 87 percent of total income taxes, up from 84 percent in 2017. It's nice to see the wealthy pay our “fair share”.
Salvador
RF's Swedenborgian
I don't mind paying a 20 percent capital gains tax on the money I've made from trading stocks. ...Most of the income earned by us privilege class folk is from investments rather than from hard labor. ....
Salvador
RF's Swedenborgian
Tariffs should be paid to subsidize working class American farmers who've lost sales to the unfair trade practitioner Chinese
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
So an income tax it is then.
Salvador
RF's Swedenborgian
Please let us not forget about a value-added-tax, which taxes consumption rather than productivity. Fairtax.org proposes how this could be done progressively.
Other well-developed advanced economy have a value-added tax system, so should our nation have a VAT.
Yang: Amazon needs to pay their fair share
Last edited:
Mudramoksha
Member
I misread the thread title as something to do with Tuxedos and I thought it was gonna be fun, oh well
Great thought.
Jollybear
Hey
Let me say this, we all have a life story. As do i. And ill admit, ive had my shar of discouragements and still do. My brain lots of times tells me itle not get better.....but then....i sink my feet into the dirt, hold tight and press on harder and keep the course of my goals, despite any setbacks. Ill work harder.....then harder. I wont give up, even if i FEEL like it.
I wont drag on telling you my story, but if i did not choose this, i know id be in a worser situation then current.
If government made a flat tax, thus incentivizing hard work, then my hard work would come with less discouragement!
Think about it.
Fact.
Jollybear
Hey
I dont understand much about terriffs. But whats wrong with free trade?
Salvador
RF's Swedenborgian
There's nothing wrong with free trade, but that's not what China does when she steals the intellectual property of foreign businesses for them to be able to do business in China.