Audie
Veteran Member
I'm afraid I must agree with PureX here. As an obhect lesson, we have but to look at Muslim culture. Now I'm not gonna go into that Muslims are violent or whatever. You've probably heard stuff like that, and it probably sounds hateful whether or not it's true. Instead we're gonna talk about imshallah.
Inshallah (my spelling is likely horrible), is basically "if Allah wills it". It basically personifies total submission to their god, and to fate. There's a problem with this right off. Well, two problems actually. First, let's assume you live this way. You go to school, "I will not need to study for a test, I will trust in Allah." Yeah, I once managed to take a test kinda guessing my way through, I still was sweating bullets with the effort of guessing. Not studying and not spending effort making good guesses, you'll probably fail. Suppose your house is getting worn out, you could call a repair guy. Or you could just shrug and say imshallah in which case the building will fall. I don't do much for my job, cuz I'm a bit lazy, but had I never advertised at all, I would have no customers. Trusting in God is much different to submitting completely to destiny. The second issue with this, is that it often is an excuse for things actively done. You can no longer say something is fate if you actively made choices to arrange a path.
Actual humility is understanding that we need other ppl in this world. Humility is comforting, because it teaches you that you are bot alone, you live in God's world.
Sealchan, the problem with this is that it completely ignores that the last hundred years has been dominated by secular idealism. "Everything would be great if we just shared wealth" leads to people who worked hard to get what they had looking at those people who barely worked at all asking for handouts and saying this is unjust. And getting killed for not going with the program. Or "everything would be great in Germany if the Jews all were gone." ( Hitler used religion as an excuse for the masses, but any serious scholar of his knows he made very anti-religious statements) Or "climate change would be resolved if we got rid of offending technology and limited our population and consumption." Same story, different words.
Inasmuchas it does appear that this, that, and the
other "god" are all no more than products of imagination,
the idea that 'submitting"yourself to your own chosen
concoction is somehow humble strikes this reader
as a bit weird.