• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What does the Bible say about the origins of the Earth in relation to what science say?

Shad

Veteran Member
You say that science KNOWS. That is totally incorrect.

Based on evidence, and the interpretation of that evidence, science postulates and creates a theory.

Theories aren´t absolute knowledge.

I once read a brilliant article by an MIT physics professor who now teaches in Israel.

His position was that distance dialates time. I have it somewhere, I will try and find it.

His thought experiment was this.

If in a very distant galaxy a powerful laser released a beam toward earth every second, the light, because of dialation would not arrive on earth seconds apart, but rather weeks apart.

So, at the point of origin the time element was seconds, on earth it was weeks, or more.

Both are right. so looking back the universe appears to be 14 billion years old, but because of time dialation it may have been created a million years ago.

This is a crude summation of what I read some time ago, It will no doubt be picked apart by someone, but I hope to retrieve the article and rebut the pickers apart.

That isn't what time dilation actually is. Time dilation is differences in time measurement due to velocity of the observer. Time measurement slow for the observer at high velocity compared to one that is not. So an hour could pass the observer moving at a high velocity while it could be 3 hours for the low velocity observer. This has been tested with the higher speeds we are capable of via planes using atomic clocks.
 
Last edited:

Audie

Veteran Member
I was wondering that too.

As he introduced embarrassment about ignorance,
it seems fair to look at embarrassing ignorance that
is so plainly displayed.

One seldom if ever finds a well educated
person who is so inept in their native language.

In other circumstances one might ask,
"Ifn ya is so smart, why ain't ya rich?"
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Well, dont make an accusation, show me where I am wrong.
That was an observation. You merely took a word out of context and put your own, non-expert interpretation on it. To show that you are wrong I only need the countless versions that do not perform that error:

Genesis 1:16 God made two great lights: the greater light to rule the day and the lesser light to rule the night. And He made the stars as well.

Changing the translation because the Bible would be wrong if one did not is never a valid reason to do so.
 

shmogie

Well-Known Member
That isn't what time dilation actually is. Time dilation is differences in time measurement due to velocity of the observer. Time measurement slow for the observer at high velocity compared to one that is not. So an hour could pass the observer moving at a high velocity while it could be 3 hours for the low velocity observer. This has been tested with the higher speeds we are capable of via planes using atomic clocks.
Yes. it is all related to E=MC2. The expansion of the universe ¨stretches time in distance, thus effecting the measurement at point A at the beginning of the expansion and point B a great distance from the beginning point of expansion. Time dilation.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
That isn't what time dilation actually is. Time dilation is differences in time measurement due to velocity of the observer. Time measurement slow for the observer at high velocity compared to one that is not. So an hour could pass the observer moving at a high velocity while it could be 3 hours for the low velocity observer. This has been tested with the higher speeds we are capable of via planes using atomic clocks.
Not exactly. The "moving person" would also observe the other person's clock moving more slowly. There is no absolute motion in physics so who is moving and who is stationary all depends on frame of reference.
 

SA Huguenot

Well-Known Member
That was an observation. You merely took a word out of context and put your own, non-expert interpretation on it. To show that you are wrong I only need the countless versions that do not perform that error:

Genesis 1:16 God made two great lights: the greater light to rule the day and the lesser light to rule the night. And He made the stars as well.

Changing the translation because the Bible would be wrong if one did not is never a valid reason to do so.
My dear friend.
If this is your argument, I want you to know that out of hundreds of manuscripts, including the DSS which contain at least 3 manuscripts of Genesis as early as 200BC, all of them do not have the words "He made ...".
If you do not want to accept a small fact about one verse in the Bible that is actually cast in concrete, I understand why you are an Atheist.
Pure "Bible derangement syndrome".
 

Wandering Monk

Well-Known Member
Yes. it is all related to E=MC2. The expansion of the universe ¨stretches time in distance, thus effecting the measurement at point A at the beginning of the expansion and point B a great distance from the beginning point of expansion. Time dilation.

If the speed of light was significantly higher in the past than today, there would have been a corresponding increase in energy released by matter (per the equation.) All stars require the reaction of matter in order for there to be the fusion that makes them work. Some Christians think the earth is only 6000 years old. If that were true and we apply their hypothesis to Einstein's equation for our sun, then 6000 years ago our sun would have put out about 800 billion times the energy it does today. Too toasty for life.
 
Last edited:

SA Huguenot

Well-Known Member
If the speed of light was significantly higher in the past than today, there would have been a corresponding increase in energy released by matter (per the equation.) All stars require the reaction of matter in order for there to be the fusion that makes them work. Some Christians think the earth is only 6000 years old. If that were true and we apply their hypothesis to Einstein's equation for our sun, then 6000 year ago our sun would have put out about 800 billion times the energy it does today. Too toasty for life.
Some Christians can think what they want, the Bible never says the Earth and Universe is 6 000 years old.
Some Christians knows the Earth is 6 000 years ols plus all the time that passed between the "Beginning" and the "First day".
Could be billions of years, who cares.
The Bible is correct and science agrees.
 

Wandering Monk

Well-Known Member
Some Christians can think what they want, the Bible never says the Earth and Universe is 6 000 years old.
Some Christians knows the Earth is 6 000 years ols plus all the time that passed between the "Beginning" and the "First day".
Could be billions of years, who cares.
The Bible is correct and science agrees.

Apparently it is very flexible when it comes to making hypotheses about the age of the universe as well.
 

sooda

Veteran Member
My dear friend.
If this is your argument, I want you to know that out of hundreds of manuscripts, including the DSS which contain at least 3 manuscripts of Genesis as early as 200BC, all of them do not have the words "He made ...".
If you do not want to accept a small fact about one verse in the Bible that is actually cast in concrete, I understand why you are an Atheist.
Pure "Bible derangement syndrome".

Why not? Genesis and Exodus were written after the Babylonian exile.. redacted and amended several times.
 

shmogie

Well-Known Member
If the speed of light was significantly higher in the past than today, there would have been a corresponding increase in energy released by matter (per the equation.) All stars require the reaction of matter in order for there to be the fusion that makes them work. Some Christians think the earth is only 6000 years old. If that were true and we apply their hypothesis to Einstein's equation for our sun, then 6000 years ago our sun would have put out about 800 billion times the energy it does today. Too toasty for life.
There is no evidence that I know of that implies that the speed of light has ever varied.

The Genesis account has much more depth than a cursory reading would apply, it can be linked to science much more than the average person would think.

The 6,000 year old number to be true is dependent upon perspective. If Time dilation works as Dr, Schroeder predicts, then the perspective from the earth early in creation in might be true, yet the perspective from the outer limits of the universe may be true as well 15 billion years.

It seems to be all about where things are measured by time.
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
Sorry, you are not using those words correctly. At least not in English. In another language possibly, but I have my doubts. You would need to be able to support that claim.
As my high school English teacher used those words, I think your local English teachers also can do the same.
To me it is Not another language even though Genesis was written in Hebrew so a local Rabbi could also shed light.
So, to me English teachers and Jewish Rabbi's could support my claim about the difference between the words ' create ' and ' make '.
We think of God creating Adam, and how did God create Adam but by forming Adam from existing earth/ground.
So, who could Not see the difference that Adam was Not a direct Creation, but created by being formed out of already existing creation.
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
Ok, except that upu are off the topic, you should tell me if God instructed that canibalism?
did he approve of it?

The only canibalsim I have found in Scripture is found at 2 kings 8 1 ( two kings ate one ) pun intended.
Canibalism was considered repulsive as found at 2 Kings 6:26-31.
Also, was the sacrificing of children as per Jeremiah 32:35; 2 Chronicles 28:3
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
............. Some Christians think the earth is only 6000 years old. If that were true and we apply their hypothesis to Einstein's equation for our sun, then 6000 years ago our sun would have put out about 800 billion times the energy it does today. Too toasty for life.

I would like to take the liberty to add to the ^ above ^ that some ' so-called Christians...'
'Christendom' (so-called Christian but mostly in name only) might teach 6,000 years, but the Bible does Not.
Just as there is No time limit given to God's 7th day, there is No time frame given for the six creative days.
God's 7th day was still on going in the first century according to Hebrews 4:4-11 and is still on going.
There is No mention if each of the creative days were of the same or differing lengths of time.
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
Why not? Genesis and Exodus were written after the Babylonian exile.. redacted and amended several times.
Noah could have easily had pre-flood writings taken on the Ark with him (Genesis 5)
Those writings could have been passed on to Moses for Moses to use.
After all, Scripture is 'the mind of God' written down for us - 2 Timothy 3:16-17.
 

sooda

Veteran Member
I would like to take the liberty to add to the ^ above ^ that some ' so-called Christians...'
'Christendom' (so-called Christian but mostly in name only) might teach 6,000 years, but the Bible does Not.
Just as there is No time limit given to God's 7th day, there is No time frame given for the six creative days.
God's 7th day was still on going in the first century according to Hebrews 4:4-11 and is still on going.
There is No mention if each of the creative days were of the same or differing lengths of time.

Its the year 5779 in the Jewish Calendar.
 

sooda

Veteran Member
Noah could have easily had pre-flood writings taken on the Ark with him (Genesis 5)
Those writings could have been passed on to Moses for Moses to use.
After all, Scripture is 'the mind of God' written down for us - 2 Timothy 3:16-17.

Moses and Noah are fictional characters in a morality tale.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
As my high school English teacher used those words, I think your local English teachers also can do the same.
To me it is Not another language even though Genesis was written in Hebrew so a local Rabbi could also shed light.
So, to me English teachers and Jewish Rabbi's could support my claim about the difference between the words ' create ' and ' make '.
We think of God creating Adam, and how did God create Adam but by forming Adam from existing earth/ground.
So, who could Not see the difference that Adam was Not a direct Creation, but created by being formed out of already existing creation.
Now you are merely spouting nonsense. .

You need to support your earlier claim. Appealing to some possibly mythical teacher does not do the trick.
 
Top