Vandalism?Leave it to the Scot to suggest vandalism as a compromise.
Tom
Nay!
Embiggenment.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Vandalism?Leave it to the Scot to suggest vandalism as a compromise.
Tom
Indeed. Regardless, they weren't just handed the position. Sure they may be ignorant of many subjects and issues, but thats why they hear cases, have evidence presented, and of course have extensive backgrounds in law. It is disingenuous, dishonest, and intellectual laziness to dismiss any of them as such.I would suggest that no member of the SCOTUS is likely to be ignorant.
Yes, I'm not surprised of Ginsburg. I see her as a political activist and not a Supreme Court Justice. IMHO
Like spay painting a Jewish star on a mosque would be "embiggenment"?Vandalism?
Nay!
Embiggenment.
You're missing that this cross is on public property.Like spay painting a Jewish star on a mosque would be "embiggenment"?
I understand that you're being sarcastic. But this is rather a large issue, a SCOTUS issue. You PC people are causing a lot of unnecessary problems. I'll thank you to go back to your shed and drink yourself Scottish. I've got my heritage and y'all have yours.
Tom
Hmmmm.... come to think of it, I do feel warm and fuzzy about the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ.The memorial cross is a constant reminder that these soldiers died for a Christian God, and not some un-existing fake god that would otherwise render their deaths as meaningless, and besides that, it gives the righteous a warn and fuzzy.
NEVER!!That's adorable coming from those who've been trying to get their handpicked judges/justices through the door in an attempt to overturn Roe Vs. Wade and Obergefell vs. Hodges.
It is the lives of the dead that gives us the freedom of today to help with the basic necessities.
You're missing that this cross is on public property.
So there's an establishment issue.
By broadening the religious references, the problem is mitigated.
The Constitution should matter to you.
Establishment vs endorse. One is in the Constitution, the other is not. Besides the Legion pick it not the government.
Splitting hairs, and how can a government that plays favorites with religion fairly represent all citizens?
jesus didn't believe in a christian god, nor worry about one. there is not christian god, there was only god that existed and exists long before christian became a thing.The memorial cross is a constant reminder that these soldiers died for a Christian God, and not some un-existing fake god that would otherwise render their deaths as meaningless, and besides that, it gives the righteous a warm and fuzzy.
Apples and oranges.Matt 23:29-Matt 23:32 NIV “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You build tombs for the prophets and decorate the graves of the righteous. And you say, ‘If we had lived in the days of our ancestors, we would not have taken part with them in shedding the blood of the prophets.’ So you testify against yourselves that you are the descendants of those who murdered the prophets. Go ahead, then, and complete what your ancestors started!
Apples and oranges.
I know that the monument is on public property.You're missing that this cross is on public property.
So there's an establishment issue.
By broadening the religious references, the problem is mitigated.
The Constitution should matter to you.
So long as it's your religious heritage, eh.I like maintaining some aspects of heritage.
My religious heritage?So long as it's your religious heritage, eh.
Well, I preserved it, & then expanded it to include others.
I know you believe in the Christian God,My religious heritage?
Did you and I just meet?
Tom