• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Would sharks and T Rex buried together lean toward the flood?

tas8831

Well-Known Member
Your own "heroes" have called Haeckel's embryo drawings, a 'fraud'! I pointed that out to you, lol.

How fudged embryo illustrations led to drawn-out lies
So precious how you bait and switch - clearly, I was referring to your unsupported claims that Haeckel is still used in textbooks today as evidence for evolution.

THAT is the lie that creationists keep spreading and failing to support, to include your professional YEC heroes. You made it clear that YOU had not actually read the texts you pasted citations for. More standard YEC clownsmanship.
 

Faithofchristian

Well-Known Member
Please post a link to the scripture about this flood that was bigger than Noah's flood.

Well seeing the flood of Noah's didn't cover the whole earth
But yet scientist have found out in deserts mountains many clam shells 300 miles from the nearest ocean.

This flood of water happen million of years before the flood of Noah's ever happened.

2 Peter 3:5-7

5--"For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water"

Note here in verse 5, The earth standing out of the water and in the water.
In Genesis 1:2, we will find the earth standing out of the water in the water.

So where exactly do you suppose this water came from, seeing that this flood of water was there way before the flood of Noah's happened.

6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished"

Note here in verse 6, everything
Perished, meaning nothing survived.
Unlike the flood of Noah's, there were
8 people and animals survived.

But in this flood that 2 Peter speaks about nothing survived, everything Perished.


7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men"

Note here in verse 7, God is not going to destroy the earth again by a flood of water.

God going to destroy everything by fire.
 

sooda

Veteran Member
Well seeing the flood of Noah's didn't cover the whole earth
But yet scientist have found out in deserts mountains many clam shells 300 miles from the nearest ocean.

This flood of water happen million of years before the flood of Noah's ever happened.

2 Peter 3:5-7

5--"For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water"

Note here in verse 5, The earth standing out of the water and in the water.
In Genesis 1:2, we will find the earth standing out of the water in the water.

So where exactly do you suppose this water came from, seeing that this flood of water was there way before the flood of Noah's happened.

6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished"

Note here in verse 6, everything
Perished, meaning nothing survived.
Unlike the flood of Noah's, there were
8 people and animals survived.

But in this flood that 2 Peter speaks about nothing survived, everything Perished.


7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men"

Note here in verse 7, God is not going to destroy the earth again by a flood of water.

God going to destroy everything by fire.

The answer is plate tectonics.

This is about the Noah flood myth NOT another flood.

5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: 6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished: 7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.

Are you really willing to remain ignorant to suit the JW???
 

Faithofchristian

Well-Known Member
Do post the chapter and verse about the first flood.



If you understood, that the flood of Noah's there were 8 people and animals survived.

But here in 2 Peter 3:5-7, nothing survived everything Perished nothing was saved alive.
That means there were two floods of water to come upon the earth.

The first flood destroyed everything.

But the flood of Noah's 8 people and animals survived.
 

tas8831

Well-Known Member
Oh yeah, the Ediacaran, where frond-shaped, non-motile organisms first appeared...no precursors to the Cambrian biota. Sorry.
If you say so.

And you are a paleontologist, are you?

Or have you been reading creationist/ID non-paleontologist essays again, and believing them to be 100% correct.

Just like you did with the use of Haeckel in modern textbooks...
 

tas8831

Well-Known Member
Part of the evidence for the validity of the Flood included the Ark's modern ratios, but you've ignored it so far, or give some vague reply, trying to derail the conversation, like "Moses didn't write Genesis" (How did whoever get that accurate seaworthy information?)

You can't answer it for fear of giving the event credibility, disturbing your world-view, so you -- and other skeptics -- ignore it. It's the only recourse you have.

No, maybe not...you readily believe in serendipitous accidents, so Moses' (oops!...whoever) writing the Ark's ideal seaworthy ratios -- 30-5-3 -- is just chalked up to being an accident.

‘Noah’s Ark would have floated’
Cool logic -

The boat described in a book written at a time when there were boats would have floated... thus... worldwide flood as described in ancient numerology texts really happened!

PROBLEM - the whole getting millions of living things on said boat; storing food and water for them alot for a year; 8 people caring for them all; etc....

Never mind all that - the ark could have FLOATED!!!
 

Hockeycowboy

Witness for Jehovah
Premium Member
If you say so.

And you are a paleontologist, are you?

Or have you been reading creationist/ID non-paleontologist essays again, and believing them to be 100% correct.

Just like you did with the use of Haeckel in modern textbooks...
No, the evidence says so.
Have you heard of Stephen Jay Gould?

Lol.
 

Hockeycowboy

Witness for Jehovah
Premium Member
So precious how you bait and switch - clearly, I was referring to your unsupported claims that Haeckel is still used in textbooks today as evidence for evolution.

THAT is the lie that creationists keep spreading and failing to support, to include your professional YEC heroes. You made it clear that YOU had not actually read the texts you pasted citations for. More standard YEC clownsmanship.
Either your comprehension skills are sorely lacking, or you lie on purpose — which is it?

I’ve repeatedly state that I’m not a YEC!

Is this difficult for you to understand? I find it hard to grasp that you are just obtuse! Abusive, yes...your attitude reveals that.
 

Hockeycowboy

Witness for Jehovah
Premium Member
There's not a geologist in the country that will tell you there was a global flood. Its ridiculous on so many levels.
The conversation you're responding to, was about the Cambrian biota, and the Ediacaran not providing any precursors.

It wasn't about the Flood.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
Cool logic -

The boat described in a book written at a time when there were boats would have floated... thus... worldwide flood as described in ancient numerology texts really happened!

PROBLEM - the whole getting millions of living things on said boat; storing food and water for them alot for a year; 8 people caring for them all; etc....

Never mind all that - the ark could have FLOATED!!!

We calls it Creologic.
 

sooda

Veteran Member
Top