Lee Hays
Member
Not one that I’ve seen either...
Careful - we seem to be -agreeing a lot... (yes I like to laugh)
I don't believe in aliens, or ghosts - or Voodoo..
But that’s just me - I respect someone if they do.
It doesn’t bother me none-
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Vote For Trump. He Wont Let Owning A Bible Become Illegal
- Thread starter Skwim
- Start date
Not one that I’ve seen either...
Careful - we seem to be -agreeing a lot... (yes I like to laugh)
I don't believe in aliens, or ghosts - or Voodoo..
But that’s just me - I respect someone if they do.
It doesn’t bother me none-
Ok Thanks... for some reason I thought he died.
Lee Hays
Member
- so critical
Kangaroo Feathers
Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
Not critical, I just don't understand your point
Lee Hays
Member
I’m just trying to - hold a conversation.
You don’t have to say - what’s your point!?
And be condescending - by thanking me for letting everyone know - about Wikipedia...
Just state how I’m wrong - I may understand you..
But now... I’m going to be a bit biased - on stuff you’ll try to tell me...
Kangaroo Feathers
Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
It's not a matter of being wrong, it's a matter of you saying something which clearly seemed to imply you were disparaging wikipedia, you say that isn't what your point was, and me trying to understand why you would just randomly drop facts about wikipedia into a discussion where they don't seem immediately relevant... unless your point was to discredit wikipedia.
I'm sorry I asked.
Kangaroo Feathers
Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
Minus a small handling fee, I'm sure.Jim Baker is selflessly selling a Trump prayer coin for $45, the prayer proceeds of which are going to help re-elect our POTUS in 2020.
Can you imagine how these people would have frothed at a coin featuring Obama with Jesus like that?
We Never Know
No Slack
Jim Baker is selling a Trump prayer coin for $45, the prayer proceeds of which are going to help re-elect our POTUS in 2020.
Televangelist Jim Bakker sells $45 Trump coin, calls it ‘point of contact’ with God
Lee Hays
Member
Don’t be sorry -
Don’t be critical dude -
Disparaging Wikipedia by saying anyone can edit?
And it was relevant - since somebody's comment was “Wikipedia says”.
Is it not true anyone can edit Wikipedia?
is it discrediting Wikipedia, by saying that anyone can edit Wikipedia?
Salvador
RF's Swedenborgian
....I know there likely are or very well might have been extraterrestrial beings.
There is evidence for a mark of extraterrestrial intelligence left in our genetic code as evident by how the numeric and semantic message of 037 appears in our genetic code.
This is evident to me by how each codon relates to 3 other particular codons having the same particular type of initial nucleobase and sequential nucleobase subsequently then followed by a different ending nucleobase. Half of these 4 set of codon groups ( whole family codons ) each code for the same particular amino acid. The other half of those 4 set of codon groups ( split codons ) don't code for the same amino acid. So then, in the case of whole family codons, there are 37 amino acid peptide chain nucleons for each relevant nucleobase determinant of how a particular amino acid gets coded. Start codons express 0 at the beginning of 37 Hence, the meaningful numeric and semantic message of 037 gets unambiguously and factually conveyed to us present day Earthling human beings with our genetic code invented by a superior intelligence beyond that of anybody presently bound to Earth.
The "Wow! signal" of the terrestrial genetic code
Vladimir I. shCherbak, Maxim A. Makukov
(Submitted on 27 Mar 2013 (v1), last revised 12 Jun 2017
Icarus, 2013, 224(1), 228-242
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2013.02.017
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.906.4671&rep=rep1&type=pdf
The significance of the semantic message "037" embedded in our genetic coding is well-explained in the following journal articles: .
Biosystems Volume 70, Issue 3, August 2003, Pages 187-209 "Arithmetic inside the universal genetic code" Author: Vladimir I. shCherbak
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar...4703000662
NeuroQuantology | December 2011 | Vol 9 | Issue 4 | Page 702-715 Masic, Natasa Nested Properties of shCherbak’s PQ 037 and (Biological) Coding/Computing Nested Numeric/Geometric/Arithmetic Propertiesof shCherbak’s Prime Quantum 037 as a Base of (Biological) Coding/Computing
https://www.researchgate.net/public...m_037_as_a_Base_of_Biological_CodingComputing
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
But that does not mean that it is unreliable. There have been studies done on Wikipedia and it is just as reliable as any other on-line encyclopedia. The least accurate parts of Wikipedia tend to be the popular culture articles. Basic science is almost always spot on and history appears to be very reliable too. Of course if one Google searches this Wiki's own articles on this come out on top but other sources say the same thing:
How Accurate Is Wikipedia?
Study shows Wikipedia Accuracy is 99.5%
http://snap.stanford.edu/soma2010/papers/soma2010_18.pdf
I would not go to Wikipedia for accurate stories about your favorite boy band or cutting edge science (though even that is not that bad). Aside from that it is about as good of a source as any.
Lee Hays
Member
Still - I never said Wikipedia was unreliable
Putting words in my mouth doesn’t help your argument -
in-fact I didn’t even finish reading your post -
As soon as you put words in my mouth - the rest of your statement is meaningless - because your just responding to the words you put in my mouth...
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Then why complain about the fact that anyone can edit it? If you read the last article it points out that articles become more reliable as the number edits go up.
People that edit with bad information are a rarity. Most people edit altruistically.
Salvador
RF's Swedenborgian
Lee Hays
Member
Dang Man - you cant stop putting words in people’s mouths Can you?
I wasn’t complaining -
All I said was I don’t like Wikipedia- as a source because anyone can edit.
If your trying to change my mind on that - your way off..
if I don’t like Fords - because anyone can work on it - and say it, in a silly post...
Are you going to tell me how year after year - they’re more reliable, and ask why I’m complaining? I still don’t like Fords for the same reason -
Lee Hays
Member
Salvador
RF's Swedenborgian
Neither do I believe there are extraterrestrial biological beings themselves visiting Earth, however, I'm convinced there is likely advanced extraterrestrial drone technology launched from a distant extraterrestrial civilization to survey Earth.
A weird object named Oumuamua is of an exosolar origin as evident by its high velocity and trajectory as it sailed through our solar system. Oumuamua apparently isn't a comet, because Oumuamua seemingly lacks a comet tail. Furthermore, Oumuamua has a fixed rotation period that would not occur if it were propelled by the out gassing of any volatile. Oumuamua's elongated shape and high Albedo is unlike that of any known asteroids in our solar system. When Oumuamua passed by the Sun, solar radiation pressure apparently accelerated Oumuamua precisely as how a solar light sail measuring a few millimeters of thickness and few hundred meters length would have been accelerated by the Sun's radiation pressure. Oumuamua is estimated to be within the range of size and it has an elongated shape as would be expected of a light sail spacecraft following Oumuamua's motion and acceleration as it went by the Sun.
Reference: Astrophysics > Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
Could Solar Radiation Pressure Explain 'Oumuamua's Peculiar Acceleration?
Shmuel Bialy, Abraham Loeb
(Submitted on 26 Oct 2018 (v1), last revised 8 Nov 2018 (this version, v4))
[1810.11490] Could Solar Radiation Pressure Explain 'Oumuamua's Peculiar Acceleration?
Last edited:
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
It's beyond bizarre how they, with strait faces, try to protray such a sleezy narcissist as a pious man of God.